> > I see. Forget about 4.0.x then. Supposing that support for > > i686-apple-darwin is added for the 4.1 series, would that be enough > > motivation to split 4.1 apart from 4.2? I've noticed the .patch work for > > your 4.2 package, mostly in the configure department. Has anyone looked > > into what it would take to at least build 4.1 on Intel? (
> Jack asked on the gcc-fortran list and was told in no uncertain terms > that intel mac supported will not be backported to gcc 4.1. My sense is > that it is not really feasible for a non-gcc developer - 4.1 and the > trunk have diverged too much. And if only the other language front-ends (excluding fortran) were "supported" for Intel, that would probably still cause enough of a headache for package management, if gfortran-4.1 were only available for powerpc. (I really mostly care about g++, but it's easy enough to build and install by hand with odcctools with a wee bit of patching, at least on powerpc.) Anyhow, thanks for entertaining the discussion. David ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
