Hi,
I got the same problems for both geomview and glui linking where the
error messages are:
mkdir .libs/libgeomview.lax/libmgx11.a
Extracting
/sw/src/fink.build/geomview191-shlibs-1.9.1-1001/geomview-1.9.1/src/lib/../../src/lib/mg/x11/.libs/libmgx11.a
(cd .libs/libgeomview.lax/libmgx11.a && ar
John Ridgway wrote:
> Friends -
> I am trying to install arch-tla on 10.5, and it depends on patch, and
> patch is not in the 10.5 tree. Why not? Is there a simple answer or
> a complex one?
I don't know the answer, but you might want to ask arch-tla's maintainer
if it really needs that dep
Alexey,
Let me know if you have any comments on how I am building
llvm and llvm-gcc-4.2. I pretty much followed the approach
found in llvm/llvm.spec.in and llvm-gcc-4.2/README.LLVM.
Jack
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 05:21:46PM +0300, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
> On 12/28/07, Jac
On Dec 28, 2007 3:12 AM, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Charles Lepple wrote:
> > It looks like we had a sdcc package way back when (10.2 era). Does
> > anyone remember what happened to it? I looked through some of the
> > tracker items, but they seem to be prior to when it disappeare
Friends -
I am trying to install arch-tla on 10.5, and it depends on patch, and
patch is not in the 10.5 tree. Why not? Is there a simple answer or
a complex one?
Peace
- John
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Micro
On 12/28/07, Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexey,
>I am currently installing both llvm and llvm-gcc-4.2 but
> I am not sure if the first is really required. Hopefully
> the gfortran support will improve over the next few months.
> Here is the comment I got on its current status...
Alexey,
I am currently installing both llvm and llvm-gcc-4.2 but
I am not sure if the first is really required. Hopefully
the gfortran support will improve over the next few months.
Here is the comment I got on its current status...
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2007-December/01196
Cool!
Did you package llvm libraries/headers separately? Or is it just
strictly gcc-oriented package? (sorry, didn't have time to look at it)
On 12/28/07, Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In case anyone is interested, I posted test
> packaging for a llvm-gcc42 package on fink
> trackin
Charles Lepple wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> It looks like we had a sdcc package way back when (10.2 era). Does
> anyone remember what happened to it? I looked through some of the
> tracker items, but they seem to be prior to when it disappeared.
It seems it did
