[Fink-devel] itk/itcl vs --build-as-nobody

2009-04-20 Thread Jack Howarth
I just noticed that the build structure used by the itcl.info and itk.info files don't allow building with --build-as-nobody. In that case, the build fails with errors of the form... make -j1 install prefix=/sw/src/fink.build/root-itcl-3.4-1/sw /usr/bin/install -c libitcl3.4.dylib

Re: [Fink-devel] itk/itcl vs --build-as-nobody

2009-04-20 Thread Martin Costabel
Jack Howarth wrote: I just noticed that the build structure used by the itcl.info and itk.info files don't allow building with --build-as-nobody. In that case, the build fails with errors of the form... This is one of the main reasons build-as-nobody was invented, namely to catch bugs like

[Fink-devel] Fink build error: mtools-4.0.1-1 on Intel OS 10.5.6

2009-04-20 Thread Monic Polynomial
(detected by Todai’s build logs) mtools-4.0.1-1 fails to build on Intel OS 10.5.6. $ fink -V | head -n 2 Package manager version: 0.29.2 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Mon Apr 20 07:43:04 2009, 10.5, i386 $ xcodebuild -version | head -n 1 Xcode 3.1.2 $ fink install mtools (...) gcc

Re: [Fink-devel] itk/itcl vs --build-as-nobody

2009-04-20 Thread Jack Howarth
Martin, I'll fix this tonight in the itcl-x86_64.info and itk-x86_64.info x86_64 variants I created. I agree that these should be fixed. I am trying to build everything on x86_64 with -m to catch these. There also needs to be a iwidgets_x86_64 variant as well (which I have) so that the build is

[Fink-devel] itk/itcl/iwidgets violate fink policy

2009-04-20 Thread Jack Howarth
Steffen, While doing additional testing of the itcl-x86_64.info and itk-x86_64.info variants that I created for x86_64 fink, I noticed that the itcl*.info, itk*.info and iwidgets.info packaging all violate fink policy in being unable to be built with --build-as-nobody. As Martin Costabel

Re: [Fink-devel] itk/itcl/iwidgets violate fink policy

2009-04-20 Thread Daniel Macks
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 09:14:08AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: Steffen, While doing additional testing of the itcl-x86_64.info and itk-x86_64.info variants that I created for x86_64 fink, I noticed that the itcl*.info, itk*.info and iwidgets.info packaging all violate fink policy in being

[Fink-devel] openssl-0.9.8k-1 fails build due to capitalization?

2009-04-20 Thread Kevin G. Mess
Hi. I'm unable to build openssl-0.9.8k-1 on repeated attempts due to the same error. On the surface, it seems to be a capitalization error of MD5.3 versus md5.3 while setting up the man pages. Here are the key lines from the build: ### for comptibility with libmd (don't know how to set up

Re: [Fink-devel] itk/itcl vs --build-as-nobody

2009-04-20 Thread William Scott
This is really my fault for not catching it (I must have failed to use --build-as-nobody when checking). Unfortunately, I need to ask for help correcting it. Bill William G. Scott Contact info: http://chemistry.ucsc.edu/~wgscott/ I wouldn't call this fairly unusual, there are many

Re: [Fink-devel] itk/itcl vs --build-as-nobody

2009-04-20 Thread William Scott
Also, it (the itcl package) actually builds successfully with --build- as-nobody, and unless I scroll back up on my terminal, I would miss this: Installing ./generic/itclIntDecls.h Installing man pages in /sw/share/man Installing body.n ... /bin/sh: /sw/share/man/mann/scope.n: Permission

Re: [Fink-devel] openssl-0.9.8k-1 fails build due to capitalization?

2009-04-20 Thread Daniel Macks
openssl-0.9.8k has been at -3 for a day or two already. Have you selfupdated lately? dan On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 06:52:39AM -0700, Kevin G. Mess wrote: Hi. I'm unable to build openssl-0.9.8k-1 on repeated attempts due to the same error. On the surface, it seems to be a capitalization error

Re: [Fink-devel] openssl-0.9.8k-1 fails build due to capitalization?

2009-04-20 Thread Alexander Hansen
Kevin G. Mess wrote: Hi. I'm unable to build openssl-0.9.8k-1 on repeated attempts due to the same error. Which is good. It's when an error isn't repeatable that things are scary. On the surface, it seems to be a capitalization error of MD5.3 versus md5.3 while setting up the man pages.

Re: [Fink-devel] Failed: phase installing: openssl-0.9.8k-1 failed

2009-04-20 Thread Alexander Hansen
Dominique Dhumieres wrote: It's being worked on. It has not propagated yet to rsync://nte.fr.eu.finkmirrors.net. Is it normal? Dominique Is the current version ( 0.9.8k-3 ) available for you yet? -- Alexander Hansen Fink User Liaison

[Fink-devel] fslogger package

2009-04-20 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
So the fslogger package needs a header that is no longer included in Mac OS X (sys/fslogger.c). Plus there is gfslogger which is a working package. If someone really wants to use specifically fslogger, they will need to also download that header to build things. But since gfslogger is

[Fink-devel] tktreectrl shlib placement issues

2009-04-20 Thread Jack Howarth
I just noticed an oddity in the tktreectrl shlib's placement. The resides in %p/lib/treectrl%v/libtreectrl%v.dylib which places it in /sw/lib/treectrl2.1/libtreectrl2.1.dylib in the current packaging for i386/powerpc of tktreectrl-2.1-2. For my x86_64 variant, I upgraded to the newer source of

Re: [Fink-devel] fslogger package

2009-04-20 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Sorry, that header is sys/fsevents.h. .hc On Apr 20, 2009, at 1:13 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: So the fslogger package needs a header that is no longer included in Mac OS X (sys/fslogger.c). Plus there is gfslogger which is a working package. If someone really wants to use

[Fink-devel] Pine-ssl

2009-04-20 Thread Herb Wright
Im trying to install pine-ssl and am getting the following errors: The LDAP library ldap/libraries/libldap.a is missing. ### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.2.iXzwoI failed, exit code 30 Removing runtime build-lock... Removing build-lock package... /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r

[Fink-devel] tktreectrl shlib placement issues

2009-04-20 Thread Jack Howarth
Nevermind. I just read Daniel Macks commits to tktreectrl-x86_64.info and tktreectrl.info. Thank goodness that are private libraries else the directory changes would have created a mess in upgrading from 2.1 to 2.2.7. Jack

Re: [Fink-devel] Failed: phase installing: openssl-0.9.8k-1 failed

2009-04-20 Thread Dominique Dhumieres
Is the current version ( 0.9.8k-3 ) available for you yet? No and I have tried distfiles.master.finkmirrors.net also, but still 0.9.8k-1!-( Dominique -- Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and

Re: [Fink-devel] Failed: phase installing: openssl-0.9.8k-1 failed

2009-04-20 Thread Alexander Hansen
Dominique Dhumieres wrote: Is the current version ( 0.9.8k-3 ) available for you yet? No and I have tried distfiles.master.finkmirrors.net also, but still 0.9.8k-1!-( Dominique You might try running fink index -f; it's possible that there is a time-stamp problem that is confusing

Re: [Fink-devel] openssl-0.9.8k-1 fails build due to capitalization?

2009-04-20 Thread Alexander Hansen
Mike Zanker wrote: On 20/04/09 17:57, Alexander Hansen wrote: Do a selfupdate: the current version is 0.9.8k-3. Still getting 0.9.8k-1 here using rsync://distfiles.master.finkmirrors.net. Mike It works for me (TM). See if running fink index -f straightens out any bad

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-beginners] Pine-ssl

2009-04-20 Thread Alexander Hansen
Herb Wright wrote: Im trying to install pine-ssl and am getting the following errors: The LDAP library ldap/libraries/libldap.a is missing. ### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.2.iXzwoI failed, exit code 30 Removing runtime build-lock... Removing build-lock package... /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r

Re: [Fink-devel] Failed: phase installing: openssl-0.9.8k-1 failed

2009-04-20 Thread Dominique Dhumieres
You might try running fink index -f; it's possible that there is a time-stamp problem that is confusing things. This does not help. Thanks Dominique -- Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-beginners] Pine-ssl

2009-04-20 Thread Daniel Johnson
On Apr 20, 2009, at 1:53 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: Herb Wright wrote: Im trying to install pine-ssl and am getting the following errors: The LDAP library ldap/libraries/libldap.a is missing. ### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.2.iXzwoI failed, exit code 30 Removing runtime build-lock...

Re: [Fink-devel] openssl-0.9.8k-1 fails build due to capitalization?

2009-04-20 Thread Stephen J. Butler
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com wrote: Mike Zanker wrote: On 20/04/09 17:57, Alexander Hansen wrote: Do a selfupdate: the current version is 0.9.8k-3. Still getting 0.9.8k-1 here using rsync://distfiles.master.finkmirrors.net. It works for me

Re: [Fink-devel] openssl-0.9.8k-1 fails build due to capitalization?

2009-04-20 Thread Alexander Hansen
Stephen J. Butler wrote: On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com wrote: Mike Zanker wrote: On 20/04/09 17:57, Alexander Hansen wrote: Do a selfupdate: the current version is 0.9.8k-3. Still getting 0.9.8k-1 here using

Re: [Fink-devel] openssl-0.9.8k-1 fails build due to capitalization?

2009-04-20 Thread Stephen J. Butler
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com wrote: Mirroring may have gotten stuck. Updating from CVS works (that's what I did). That seems to have worked! Building now. -- Stay on

Re: [Fink-devel] openssl-0.9.8k-1 fails build due to capitalization?

2009-04-20 Thread Mike Zanker
On 20/4/09 18:52, Alexander Hansen wrote: It works for me (TM). See if running fink index -f straightens out any bad timestamping. Doesn't help, I'm afraid. Mike -- Stay on top of everything new and different,

Re: [Fink-devel] Failed: phase installing: openssl-0.9.8k-1 failed

2009-04-20 Thread Martin Costabel
Alexander Hansen wrote: Dominique Dhumieres wrote: It's being worked on. It has not propagated yet to rsync://nte.fr.eu.finkmirrors.net. Is it normal? Dominique Is the current version ( 0.9.8k-3 ) available for you yet? The rsync mirrors are currently sleeping, since a little

Re: [Fink-devel] itk/itcl vs --build-as-nobody

2009-04-20 Thread Martin Costabel
William Scott wrote: Also, it (the itcl package) actually builds successfully with --build- as-nobody, and unless I scroll back up on my terminal, I would miss this: Installing ./generic/itclIntDecls.h Installing man pages in /sw/share/man Installing body.n ... /bin/sh:

Re: [Fink-devel] itk/itcl vs --build-as-nobody

2009-04-20 Thread William Scott
On Apr 20, 2009, at 12:12 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: William Scott wrote: Also, it (the itcl package) actually builds successfully with -- build- as-nobody, and unless I scroll back up on my terminal, I would miss this: Installing ./generic/itclIntDecls.h Installing man pages in

[Fink-devel] Removal of micq from Fink?

2009-04-20 Thread Monic Polynomial
Having detected a build error in micq-0.4.10.1-1, I contacted the maintainer listed in the package description, Rüdiger. His reply: ‘Please also note that the current version of climm is 0.6.4; mICQ 0.4.10 is more than 6 years old. Obviously, there cannot be any support for this anymore.

Re: [Fink-devel] openssl-0.9.8k-1 fails build due to capitalization?

2009-04-20 Thread Alexander Hansen
Mike Zanker wrote: On 20/4/09 18:52, Alexander Hansen wrote: It works for me (TM). See if running fink index -f straightens out any bad timestamping. Doesn't help, I'm afraid. Mike Try again: supposedly the mirror process just recently got unstuck. -- Alexander Hansen

[Fink-devel] openmpi-1.3.1-1000 case sensitivity issue.

2009-04-20 Thread Alexander Hansen
Selecting previously deselected package openmpi-dev. (Reading database ... 294018 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking openmpi-dev (from .../openmpi-dev_1.3.1-1000_darwin-i386.deb) ... /sw/bin/dpkg: error processing

Re: [Fink-devel] itk/itcl vs --build-as-nobody

2009-04-20 Thread Martin Costabel
William Scott wrote: This is strange. Do you have a different make installed? Or a different fink version? Same happens with /usr/bin/make when I removed the fink one. The explanation is simpler (?): When you run first fink build itcl and then fink --build-as-nobody rebuild

Re: [Fink-devel] openssl-0.9.8k-1 fails build due to capitalization?

2009-04-20 Thread Mike Zanker
On 20/4/09 20:54, Alexander Hansen wrote: Try again: supposedly the mirror process just recently got unstuck. Yup, got it now, thanks. Mike -- Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java

[Fink-devel] itcl/itk private shlibs?

2009-04-20 Thread Jack Howarth
Daniel, Looking at how debian treats itcl and itk, I think these packages need to be reworked. The shared libs shouldn't be buried in a subdirectory but should be in %p/lib. Debian has a main itcl package with a itcl-dev splitoff. http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/itcl3/filelist

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-beginners] Pine-ssl

2009-04-20 Thread Herb Wright
You are both correct. I switched to alpine and it works great! Thanks, Herb Wright Contractor Desktop Group NCBI/NLM/NIH wrigh...@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov -- Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and

[Fink-devel] iwidgets vs --build-as-nobody

2009-04-20 Thread Jack Howarth
The make install in iwidgets seems to be badly broken. I try the info file... Info2: Package: iwidgets Version: 4.0.1 Revision: 100 Architecture: x86_64 Description: Mega-widget support for Tcl Maintainer: Steffen Schmidt steffen.schm...@tuebingen.mpg.de DescDetail: License: Restrictive