Thanks for your suggestion. I think the following way
You could have texlive-texmf *just*
Replaces it, and then supply an updated tetex-texmf that is empty
and just specifies Depends:texlive-texmf.
is a good solution, if Fink officially employs TeX Live and
drops teTeX, with the permission of
On Oct 11, 2009, at 11:47 PM, Tomoaki Okayama wrote:
Thanks for your suggestion. I think the following way
You could have texlive-texmf *just*
Replaces it, and then supply an updated tetex-texmf that is empty
and just specifies Depends:texlive-texmf.
is a good solution, if Fink officially
At Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:59:49 +0200,
Carsten Schultz wrote:
Tomoaki Okayama schrieb:
Dear Fink users/developers,
I am pleased to announce that TeX Live is now available on
10.4/10.5/10.6 in unstable. Enjoy it!
- libkpathsea4.info (3.5.7-1, update)
- texlive-texmf.info
Tomoaki Okayama schrieb:
At Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:59:49 +0200,
Carsten Schultz wrote:
Tomoaki Okayama schrieb:
Dear Fink users/developers,
I am pleased to announce that TeX Live is now available on
10.4/10.5/10.6 in unstable. Enjoy it!
- libkpathsea4.info (3.5.7-1, update)
-
A little thing I've been hacking on'n'off for a while, seems like it
could be a solution to the 10.6 lost its .la problem. It's a patch
to dpkg that runs a global script as part of the normal
{Pre,Post}{Inst,Rm} process. For example, global postinst could
include a one-liner to sanitize the .la
At Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:07:28 +0200,
Carsten Schultz wrote:
Tomoaki Okayama schrieb:
At Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:59:49 +0200,
Carsten Schultz wrote:
I appreciate your effort, since tetex is getting old. On the other
hand, it works fine for me at the moment, and I would like postpone
Carsten Schultz schrieb:
Tomoaki Okayama schrieb:
I didn't intend to force users to use texlive. If
BuildDepends: texlive-texmf | tetex-texmf
works, it makes sense because you don't have to download the big
texlive-20080822-texmf-delpdf.tar.bz2 (still have to download
I would be very cautious about automating bug reports
for gcc. The last thing we need is upstream getting irked
over a flood of bootstrap failures that are due to incorrect
local configurations. Darwin is already treated as a free
loader by upstream (hence the target depreciation). Abusing
the
