Re: [Fink-devel] Problem installing sbcl

2010-01-01 Thread monipol
That's odd. As far as I can tell Martin Costabel's instructions should have made dpkg forget about sbcl altogether. Could you possibly post your /sw/var/lib/dpkg/status file to some Web or FTP server so that we are able to get it? If that's not possible, send it to my e-mail address (do not

Re: [Fink-devel] Problem installing sbcl

2010-01-01 Thread Martin Costabel
Dr. Wolfram Schroers wrote: Martin, I have followed the instructions and removed the entries from /sw/var/lib/dpkg/status. There were no files with sbcl in their names in the /sw/var/lib/dpkg/info subdirectory. Finally, I ran fink scanpackages and sudo apt-get update. When trying to

Re: [Fink-devel] Problem installing sbcl

2010-01-01 Thread Alexander Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 1/1/10 11:05 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: Dr. Wolfram Schroers wrote: Martin, I have followed the instructions and removed the entries from /sw/var/lib/dpkg/status. There were no files with sbcl in their names in the /sw/var/lib/dpkg/info

Re: [Fink-devel] Problem installing sbcl

2010-01-01 Thread Martin Costabel
Alexander Hansen wrote: [] I was told that the package functioned on 10.6/64-bit. I didn't have time actually to verify that on a clean 10.6 system at that time, but verified that it works on 10.5; I applied an update to maxima concurrently. There is something weird going on: I have two build

Re: [Fink-devel] Problem installing sbcl

2010-01-01 Thread Martin Costabel
Martin Costabel wrote: Alexander Hansen wrote: [] I was told that the package functioned on 10.6/64-bit. I didn't have time actually to verify that on a clean 10.6 system at that time, but verified that it works on 10.5; I applied an update to maxima concurrently. There is something weird