Hi Martin,
I recently got updated boost1.35.systempython packages, but they fail
to build. The build process says "updating 127 packages", and many
lines later, the result is 119 targets updated, 4 skipped, 4 failed.
The failed packages are:
darwin.compile.c++ bin.v2/libs/python/build/darwi
Am 13.01.2010 um 22:19 schrieb Damian Dimmich:
> fwiw - if the package has been around for 3 years, wouldn't it make
> sense to put it into stable?
First off, I have no idea whether the Fink package has been around for
3 years.
Even if it is has been around that long, we don't move packages t
Fair enough - what are the criteria for moving packages into stable?
I have been using that package for around a year now and it works great :)
I'm guessing that maintaining stable is a lot more work - do most people
use unstable like me?
Damian
Max Horn wrote:
>
> Am 13.01.2010 um 22:19 schri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Hi Martin,
>
> I recently got updated boost1.35.systempython packages, but they fail
> to build. The build process says "updating 127 packages", and many
> lines later, the result is 119 targets updated, 4 skipped, 4 failed.
> The failed packa
Op 14 jan 2010, om 13:11 heeft Alexander Hansen het volgende geschreven:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> I recently got updated boost1.35.systempython packages, but they fail
>> to build. The build process says "updating 127 packages", and many
>> lines lat
fwiw - if the package has been around for 3 years, wouldn't it make
sense to put it into stable?
Max Horn wrote:
> Am 12.01.2010 um 21:33 schrieb Alexander Hansen:
>
>>
> [...]
>
>
>> However, your information is not quite correct. According to
>>
>> http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/pack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>
> Op 14 jan 2010, om 13:11 heeft Alexander Hansen het volgende geschreven:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>> Hi Martin,
>>>
>>> I recently got updated boost1.35.systempython packages, but they fail
>>> to build. The build
Op 14 jan 2010, om 15:34 heeft Alexander Hansen het volgende geschreven:
> Nah, we started it on -devel, so let's finish it there. I'm just
> trying
> to think of ways to make it easier for users to find their issues in
> the
> archives.
>
> I'm not able to reproduce this error on 10.5/i386.
Alexander Hansen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>> Op 14 jan 2010, om 13:11 heeft Alexander Hansen het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
Hi Martin,
I recently got updated boost1.35.systempython packages, but
Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
> I get the same error on 10.5/i386. Previous revisions of
> boost1.35.systempython (-2 and -3) built fine, but -5 crashes with the
> "error: 'PyVarObject_HEAD_INIT' was not declared in this scope" errors
> that Sjors also gets.
Like Alex, I didn't get the erro
Hello
I installed screen 4.0.3-2 on 10.5 and after that sudo would not work in screen.
To reproduce:
0) install screen
1) connect through ssh and start screen. Test that sudo works
2) disconnect
3) reconnect and reattach screen
sudo now does not work complaining about wrong port or something.
Martin Costabel wrote:
> Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
>
>> I get the same error on 10.5/i386. Previous revisions of
>> boost1.35.systempython (-2 and -3) built fine, but -5 crashes with the
>> "error: 'PyVarObject_HEAD_INIT' was not declared in this scope" errors
>> that Sjors also gets.
>
Michal Suchanek wrote:
[]
> Apple's version of screen works flawlessly.
In addition, the version that comes with MacOSX since 10.4 is the same
as the one in Fink, minus the bug.
Therefore I second Michal's suggestion. This package has no reason to exist.
--
Martin
-
> Michal Suchanek wrote:
> []
> > Apple's version of screen works flawlessly.
>
> In addition, the version that comes with MacOSX since 10.4
> is the same
> as the one in Fink, minus the bug.
>
> Therefore I second Michal's suggestion. This package has no
> reason to exist.
>
> --
> Martin
>
In my case, fink's screen works flawlessly (including sudo), and Apple's is
problematic (hangs). I am not using bash. Maybe bash is not playing well with
fink's screen...
--
Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conferenc
2010/1/15 William G. Scott :
> In my case, fink's screen works flawlessly (including sudo), and Apple's is
> problematic (hangs). I am not using bash. Maybe bash is not playing well
> with fink's screen...
I don't think the shell could affect how sudo works but it could hang
the screen. Perhap
16 matches
Mail list logo
