hi,
I have submitted my package on fink but i have opted for a wrong option in
Which section does it belong in?
Added to Fink
now i want to change the option to
Undergoing Validation
how can i make this change
do i need to remove the package from and then again submit??
and if so then what is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/15/10 9:41 AM, jaya sharma wrote:
hi,
I have submitted my package on fink
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=414256aid=2970410group_id=17203
but i have opted for a wrong option in
Which section does it belong in?
Added to
Hi,
I submitted extex.info on March 2nd. I was wondering whether any developer
should be assigned in the Assigned drop down by the person who submitted
the info file. Just curious though
Thank you.
--
Regards,
Hariharan B
International Institute of Information Technology, Bangalore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/15/10 9:51 AM, Hariharan B wrote:
Hi,
I submitted extex.info http://extex.info on March 2nd. I was wondering
whether any developer should be assigned in the Assigned drop down by
the person who submitted the info file. Just curious though
Hi there,
can somebody advise me on libgettext3 vs. libgettext8 -- in particular, for new
packages (and when revising existing packages of mines), should I stick with
libgettext3, or are we going to gradually migrate to libgettext8 ? Is there any
kind of policy on this? I searched for this but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/15/10 10:39 AM, Max Horn wrote:
Hi there,
can somebody advise me on libgettext3 vs. libgettext8 -- in particular, for
new packages (and when revising existing packages of mines), should I stick
with libgettext3, or are we going to
Hi there,
so last night I finally made the move from OS X 10.5 to 10.6. As part of that,
I reinstalled Fink from scratch. This went mostly fine, but there were a couple
of annoyances, one of which I want to describe here:
Several packages, among them libcurl4 and coreutils (maintainers CCed),
Hi there,
so last night I finally made the move from OS X 10.5 to 10.6. As part of that,
I reinstalled Fink from scratch. This went mostly fine, but there were a couple
of annoyances, one of which I want to describe here:
I tried to install wireshark-ssl and xchat (which I maintain), and also
Am 15.03.2010 um 15:42 schrieb Alexander Hansen:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/15/10 10:39 AM, Max Horn wrote:
Hi there,
can somebody advise me on libgettext3 vs. libgettext8 -- in particular, for
new packages (and when revising existing packages of mines), should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/15/10 10:49 AM, Max Horn wrote:
Hi there,
so last night I finally made the move from OS X 10.5 to 10.6. As part of
that, I reinstalled Fink from scratch. This went mostly fine, but there were
a couple of annoyances, one of which I want to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/15/10 10:58 AM, Max Horn wrote:
Am 15.03.2010 um 15:42 schrieb Alexander Hansen:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/15/10 10:39 AM, Max Horn wrote:
Hi there,
can somebody advise me on libgettext3 vs. libgettext8 -- in
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Max Horn m...@quendi.de wrote:
Hi there,
so last night I finally made the move from OS X 10.5 to 10.6. As part of
that, I reinstalled Fink from scratch. This went mostly fine, but there were
a couple of annoyances, one of which I want to describe here:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 03:55:15PM +0100, Max Horn wrote:
This is certainly not a huge issue, but I still found it quite disturbing. Do
I really need db44(-aes), db47(-aes) and db48(-aes) all at the same time?
Hrmm... So I looked a bit, and discovered the following:
* svn,
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 03:49:16PM +0100, Max Horn wrote:
Hi there,
so last night I finally made the move from OS X 10.5 to 10.6. As part of
that, I reinstalled Fink from scratch. This went mostly fine, but there were
a couple of annoyances, one of which I want to describe here:
Several
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:07:05AM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/15/10 10:58 AM, Max Horn wrote:
Am 15.03.2010 um 15:42 schrieb Alexander Hansen:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/15/10 10:39 AM, Max Horn
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org wrote:
Two-level namespace *should* encapsulate things within each lib, but
if one lib passes a struct or database to another, there could be
problems. With the loss of .la data (due to deleting those files or
installing
On Mar 15, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org wrote:
Two-level namespace *should* encapsulate things within each lib, but
if one lib passes a struct or database to another, there could be
problems. With the loss of .la
17 matches
Mail list logo
