Kurt,
I noticed while updating relax-py for fink unstable
that scientificpython-py currently depends on the
obsolete scipy-core-py package. Could you update the
scientificpython-py package to depend on numpy-py instead?
Thanks in advance as this will allow -m builds.
Jack
---
hey alexander, dave, and list,
thanks for your quick responses.
> Yes, but that is not compliant with _our_ packaging standards. You have
> to have a -shlibs splitoff if this is a library that can be built
> against by other packages, or you can mark the library as private if the
> library is on
On Jun 24, 2010, at 8:37 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The experimental apt-shlibs violates the Shlibs policy.
>
> Experimental:
> $ dpkg -L apt-shlibs
> /.
> /sw
> /sw/lib
> /sw/lib/libapt-inst.1.1.0.dylib
> /sw/lib/libapt-pkg.4.8.0.dylib
> /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The experimental apt-shlibs violates the Shlibs policy.
Experimental:
$ dpkg -L apt-shlibs
/.
/sw
/sw/lib
/sw/lib/libapt-inst.1.1.0.dylib
/sw/lib/libapt-pkg.4.8.0.dylib
/sw/share
/sw/share/doc
/sw/share/doc/apt-shlibs
/sw/share/doc/apt-shlibs/AUTHORS
On Jun 24, 2010, at 8:21 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>
>
> And why are you marking it as BuildDependsOnly: true? That's normally
> reserved for header packages.
He probably did that to get rid of a validator warning, since he does have
header files in his package.
-- Dave
--
Peter,
Let me refer you to a section of the Fink Packaging Manual
http://www.finkproject.org/doc/packaging/policy.php?phpLang=en#sharedlibs which
explains how shared libraries are packaged in fink. Basically, you need to use
fink's Splitoff mechanism to divide your package into a few others.
On 24 Jun 2010, at 03:09, DJamé Seddah wrote:
> Hi list,
> I just installed fink on a brand new 10.6.4 install (using rsync,
> selfupdate, etc.) and I wanted to install mc
> (fink install mc)
> and I'm astonished about the amount of stuff that seems to be needed
> for this soft: 57 pkgs, among
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/24/10 10:05 AM, peterwong wrote:
> hello fink-devel,
>
> i've successfully put together a package for libdmtx-0.7.2, but since this
> is the first fink package i'm attempting to contribute, i'm sure there are
> some problems with it. however,
hello fink-devel,
i've successfully put together a package for libdmtx-0.7.2, but since this
is the first fink package i'm attempting to contribute, i'm sure there are
some problems with it. however, it did install, and it is working (for me,
anyhow). the .info and the .patch file are pretty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/23/10 9:09 PM, DJamé Seddah wrote:
> Hi list,
> I just installed fink on a brand new 10.6.4 install (using rsync,
> selfupdate, etc.) and I wanted to install mc
> (fink install mc)
> and I'm astonished about the amount of stuff that seems to b
Hi,
the actual problem here are *build* dependencies most of the time. A lot of
stuff pulls in insane amounts of dependencies just so that it can compile
documentation of the given package, using LaTeX or DocBook... sometimees it
even involves graphviz (for graphs) which then gets you an insane
11 matches
Mail list logo
