Re: [Fink-devel] ncurses 6.0 packages for fink base

> On Oct 7, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Daniel Johnson > wrote: > > > On Oct 6, 2016, at 1:32 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > > > I noticed that Fedora is building both --with-abi-version=5 and > &

Re: [Fink-devel] ncurses 6.0 packages for fink base

> On Oct 6, 2016, at 1:32 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > I noticed that Fedora is building both --with-abi-version=5 and > --with-abi-version=6 in their ncurses 6.0 package... > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/ncurses.git/tree/ncurses.spec > > but that the installed headers will only b

Re: [Fink-devel] ncurses 6.0 packages for fink base

> On Oct 6, 2016, at 10:19 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > Chris, > I've posted packaging for libncursesw6-6.0-1 and ncurses6-6.0-1 to fink > tracking... > > https://sourceforge.net/p/fink/package-submissions/4803/ > > as well as an update to libncursesw5-5.9-20110507-2 to make it aware

[Fink-devel] Warning about cvs key breakage on 10.12

After updating to 10.12, cvs started behaving badly. On every selfupdate it would ask me for my admin password multiple times in a row and then my sf.net password. Turns out that my ssh keys, which I generated years ago, were dsa keys. Starting with OpenSSH 7 dsa keys are disabled by default. 10

[Fink-devel] Broken pypi.python.org download links

For anyone who maintains python modules, pypi has changed their download links in a way that completely breaks fink. They replaced the regular links like https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/c/cffi/cffi-1.6.0.tar.gz with this abomination: https://pypi.python.org/packages/b6/98/11feff87072e2e

Re: [Fink-devel] ruby20 & ruby22 hardcode gmkdir, ginstall, and grep at buildtime if present

> On Mar 14, 2016, at 11:03 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser > wrote: > > ruby20 and ruby22 hardcode the coreutils executables gmkdir and ginstall into > rbconfig.rb if present at buildtime. Fink's grep gets the same treatment. > This then leads to buildtime failures of some ruby gems if coreutil

Re: [Fink-devel] Audacious Package

> On Jan 30, 2016, at 3:34 PM, Alexander Hansen > wrote: > > >> On Jan 30, 2016, at 08:31, David Lowe wrote: >> >> So i was looking into updating the currently unmaintained Audacious >> package. We have version 2.2, upstream has 3.7. Since our package names >> actually start with "a

Re: [Fink-devel] "Duplicate sources.list entry"

> On Nov 7, 2015, at 9:35 PM, Alexander Hansen > wrote: > >> >> On Nov 7, 2015, at 16:15, Max Horn wrote: >> >> so, I keep seeing this message at the end of any "fink install" run that >> involves building a package: >> >> " >> Reading Package Lists... Done >> Building Dependency Tree... D

Re: [Fink-devel] Typo in graphicsmagick-q32 dependencies

> On Oct 21, 2015, at 11:16 AM, Derek Homeier > wrote: > > Hi, > > this package does not update due to a non-existing dependency in the -dev > Splitoff: > > < Depends: graphicsmagick1321-q32-shlibs (= %V) > --- >> Depends: graphicsmagick1322-q32-shlibs (= %V) > > Cheers, >

[Fink-devel] openssl is changing their license

The subject says it all. They are working to relicense openssl as Apache 2.0 which would make it GPL compatible. No timeline yet but here is the post about it: https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2015/08/01/cla/ Daniel signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ---

Re: [Fink-devel] box.info, box-0.2.2.info and box-0.3.4.info

> On Sep 26, 2015, at 5:48 PM, Daniel Johnson > wrote: > > >> On Sep 26, 2015, at 5:46 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> >> Daniel, >> Is there any reason to maintain the box-0.2.2.info and box-0.3.4.info >> packaging in the 10.9-libc++ tree?

Re: [Fink-devel] box.info, box-0.2.2.info and box-0.3.4.info

> On Sep 26, 2015, at 5:46 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > Daniel, > Is there any reason to maintain the box-0.2.2.info and box-0.3.4.info > packaging in the 10.9-libc++ tree? I don't see any packages currently in the > 10.9-libc++ tree with a BuildDepends on libboxcore0.2 or libboxcore0.3.

Re: [Fink-devel] pruning ruby packaging in 10.9-libc++ tree

> On Sep 26, 2015, at 5:08 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > Daniel, > Any reason why we can't prune back the five different ruby packages in > the 10.9-libc++ to just the most current ruby22 packaging? I only see a > BuildConflicts on these packages in net/epic5.info and the legacy commented

Re: [Fink-devel] OpenSSL

> On Sep 25, 2015, at 11:34 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser > wrote: > > On 9/25/2015 7:15 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: >> So, apparently, Apple deprecated the system OpenSSL as of 10.7: >> http://lists.apple.com/archives/macnetworkprog/2015/Jun/msg00025.html >>

Re: [Fink-devel] Tested switching to new 10.9-libcxx tree

> On Sep 25, 2015, at 1:14 PM, Alexander Hansen > wrote: > > There are a couple of relatively minor hiccups: > > 1) You would have to use “fink selfupdate” twice: once to update fink, and > once to download the 10.9-libcxx package descriptions. > 2) The locally-build .deb collection gets o

Re: [Fink-devel] deprecating openexr6/ilmbase out of 10.9-libc++ tree

> On Sep 22, 2015, at 9:57 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Jack Howarth > wrote: > Daniel, > Thats is > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Daniel Johnson > wrote: > > > On Sep 20, 2015, at 12:08 PM, Jack Ho

Re: [Fink-devel] deprecating openexr6/ilmbase out of 10.9-libc++ tree

w packages left > which need to be adjusted for this change in both the 10.7 and 10.9-libc++ > trees (note that ilmbase/libopenexr6 remains in the 10.7 tree but we want to > keep the packaging in sync). The packages which need updated for this change > are... > > Pete Woods > grap

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-beginners] SF.net outage

> On Jul 29, 2015, at 5:14 PM, Alexander Hansen > wrote: > > As folks have probably noticed, SourceForge has had a major outage from which > they’re gradually recovering. Unfortunately, CVS is going to be one of the > last services to come back up. This affects: > > selfupdates, even from

Re: [Fink-devel] lib install_name changing from absolute path to @rpath

> On Jul 6, 2015, at 1:46 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser > wrote: > > If a library changes its install_name from /absolute/path/to/foo.X.dylib > to @rpath/foo.X.dylib (X is the same, c_v is bumped), does this need a new > libN package name? The file is installed to the same location, so packages

Re: [Fink-devel] OpenSSL vs. LibreSSL

> On Jun 21, 2015, at 12:29 AM, TheSin wrote: > > if the license says that pens can not be distributed in binary form wouldn’t > it only be ssl that needs to be built, couldn’t other packages which only > dynamically use the dylib still be binary distributed since it does not > contain the op

Re: [Fink-devel] OpenSSL vs. LibreSSL

> On Jun 20, 2015, at 7:03 PM, Daniel Johnson > wrote: > > >> On Jun 20, 2015, at 6:49 PM, Alexander Hansen >> wrote: >> >> >>> On Jun 20, 2015, at 15:03, Daniel Johnson >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On Ju

Re: [Fink-devel] OpenSSL vs. LibreSSL

> On Jun 20, 2015, at 6:49 PM, Alexander Hansen > wrote: > > >> On Jun 20, 2015, at 15:03, Daniel Johnson wrote: >> >> >>> On Jun 20, 2015, at 4:58 PM, Alexander Hansen >>> wrote: >>> >>> Since the system’s OpenSSL is

Re: [Fink-devel] OpenSSL vs. LibreSSL

> On Jun 20, 2015, at 4:58 PM, Alexander Hansen > wrote: > > Since the system’s OpenSSL is going away for 10.11 we’ve got a bit of a > pickle. > > My understanding is that our packages that use openssl100-dev and have > binaries are now technically in violation of the openssl license, which

Re: [Fink-devel] dbi-pm fails to compile

> On May 5, 2015, at 6:27 PM, Kevin Horton wrote: > > On May 5, 2015 at 4:48:25 PM, Daniel Johnson (daniel.johnso...@gmail.com) > wrote: >> >> > On May 5, 2015, at 5:03 AM, Kevin Horton wrote: >> > >> > On May 5, 2015 at 1:07:15 AM, Daniel Macks

Re: [Fink-devel] dbi-pm fails to compile

> On May 5, 2015, at 5:03 AM, Kevin Horton wrote: > > On May 5, 2015 at 1:07:15 AM, Daniel Macks (dma...@netspace.org) wrote: >> On Mon, 04 May 2015 10:22:26 -0400, Daniel Macks wrote: >> On Mon, 4 May 2015 08:41:55 -0400, Kevin Horton wrote: >> > I’m looking at taking over dbi-pm from Benjami

Re: [Fink-devel] libwebp4-0.3.1-3 buiild failure

> On May 5, 2015, at 2:13 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote: > >> >> On May 5, 2015, at 2:10 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> >> Daniel, >>This builds libwebp4 fine here on 10.10. >>Jack >> >> --- libwebp4.info 2015-05-05 14:08:33.

Re: [Fink-devel] libwebp4-0.3.1-3 buiild failure

> On May 5, 2015, at 2:10 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > Daniel, > This builds libwebp4 fine here on 10.10. > Jack > > --- libwebp4.info 2015-05-05 14:08:33.0 -0400 > +++ libwebp4.info.new 2015-05-05 14:07:46.0 -0400 > @@ -31,23 +31,28 @@ > Depends: %n-shlibs (=

Re: [Fink-devel] libwebp4-0.3.1-3 buiild failure

> On May 5, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Alexander Hansen > wrote: > > >> On May 5, 2015, at 10:49, Jack Howarth wrote: >> >> Daniel, >>When is the last time libwebp4-0.3.1-3 built? I am getting the failure... >> >> Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: >> "_glutLeaveMainLoop", referenced fro

Re: [Fink-devel] libwebp4-0.3.1-3 buiild failure

> On May 5, 2015, at 1:49 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > Daniel, > When is the last time libwebp4-0.3.1-3 built? I am getting the failure... > > Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: > "_glutLeaveMainLoop", referenced from: > _HandleKey in vwebp-vwebp.o > "_glutSetOption", referenc

Re: [Fink-devel] git-2.3.1-1+10.10 InfoTest failures

> On Mar 7, 2015, at 7:48 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > Daniel, >I am seeing the following failures with 'fink -m' on the new git > packaging on 10.10... > > Test Summary Report > --- > t9200-git-cvsexportcommit.sh (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: > 0) > Non-

Re: [Fink-devel] Failed: phase compiling: svn-swig-pm5182-1.8.11-1 failed

> On Feb 9, 2015, at 4:10 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote: > > > > > Daniel > >> On Feb 9, 2015, at 1:41 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> >> which is unresolved upstream. Has svn-swig-py been rebuilt under any >> 3.0.x release of swig? > > Yes, I

Re: [Fink-devel] Failed: phase compiling: svn-swig-pm5182-1.8.11-1 failed

Daniel > On Feb 9, 2015, at 1:41 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > which is unresolved upstream. Has svn-swig-py been rebuilt under any > 3.0.x release of swig? Yes, I built with swig 3.0.0 recently and all tests passed. Daniel ---

Re: [Fink-devel] Failed: phase compiling: svn-swig-pm5182-1.8.11-1 failed

n/bindings/swig/core.i:795: Error: Unknown SWIG > preprocessor directive: keeping (if this is a block of target language > code, delimit it with %{ and %}) > build-outputs.mk:259: recipe for target > 'subversion/bindings/swig/perl/native/core.c' failed > make: *** [subversion/

Re: [Fink-devel] CVS annoyances? How about git?

> On Feb 8, 2015, at 6:53 PM, Alexander Hansen > wrote: > > On 2/7/15 6:50 AM, Daniel Johnson wrote: >> >>> On Feb 6, 2015, at 12:15 PM, Alexander Hansen >>> wrote: >>> >>> Yeah, I hear you. That’d be why we’ll have people go through p

Re: [Fink-devel] CVS annoyances? How about git?

> On Feb 6, 2015, at 12:15 PM, Alexander Hansen > wrote: > > Yeah, I hear you. That’d be why we’ll have people go through pull requests > initially, because those show all of the changes that will be made. > >> On Feb 6, 2015, at 9:14 AM, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote: >> >> Ideally, it would k

Re: [Fink-devel] transitioning python packages to framework builds

> On Jan 30, 2015, at 9:18 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > >if wx.Platform == "__WXMAC__": >msg = """This program needs access to the screen. > Please run with a Framework build of python, and only when you are > logged in on the main display of your Mac.""" This message i

Re: [Fink-devel] transitioning python packages to framework builds

> On Jan 30, 2015, at 8:15 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > Daniel, > While working on a new wxpython300-py package to support the > newest release of relax 3.3.5 (which considers wxwidgets prior to 3.0 > to be too buggy), I discovered that two major problems. The cocoa > variant of wxpython300

Re: [Fink-devel] swig-3.0.3-1

Daniel > On Jan 26, 2015, at 3:51 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > Daniel, > Can we update swig to the newer 3.0.3 release... > > Index: swig.info > === > RCS file: /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.7/stable/main/finkinfo/languages/swig.inf

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink install inkscape failure

> On Jan 17, 2015, at 1:48 PM, Alexander Hansen > wrote: > >> >> On Jan 17, 2015, at 8:18 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: >> >> >> On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 15:47:17 +0900, Akio Sakai wrote: >> Dear Daniel, >>> >>> I have successfully installed inkscape on MacOSX10.8.5. >>> >>> i inkscape 0

Re: [Fink-devel] cvs-fast-export tar file

> On Jan 9, 2015, at 7:24 AM, Daniel Johnson wrote: > > >> On Jan 8, 2015, at 11:00 PM, Greg Minshall wrote: >> >> hi. apparently cvs-fast-export rolled over to version 1.29 >> >> 1.29: 2014-12-17 >> A significant improvement in the cor

Re: [Fink-devel] cvs-fast-export tar file

> On Jan 8, 2015, at 11:00 PM, Greg Minshall wrote: > > hi. apparently cvs-fast-export rolled over to version 1.29 > > 1.29: 2014-12-17 >A significant improvement in the correctness of vendor-branch handling. >More speed improvements. > > 1.28: 2014-12-08 >Fix for buggy emissi

Re: [Fink-devel] trouble with boost 1.53

> On Dec 24, 2014, at 1:52 AM, Jesse Alama wrote: > > I'm working on updating a package of mine (ledger) that uses the boost C++ > suite (I'm using boost1.53.python27) as well as libicu48. I'm having some > trouble with the build and can't quite tell where the problem lies. Consider > this

Re: [Fink-devel] daemonic - not working in Yosemite

> On Nov 26, 2014, at 8:24 AM, Daniel Johnson > wrote: > > >> On Nov 24, 2014, at 7:07 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: >> >> Hmm, I think the only hard requirement is that the direct descendent of >> launchd (the first copy of the child process) can't e

Re: [Fink-devel] daemonic - not working in Yosemite

> On Nov 24, 2014, at 7:07 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: > > Hmm, I think the only hard requirement is that the direct descendent of > launchd (the first copy of the child process) can't exit. You're right that > running daemon() breaks that rule, but I think a simple fork-and-exec is okay > as l

Re: [Fink-devel] daemonic - not working in Yosemite

> On Nov 24, 2014, at 9:21 AM, Charles Lepple wrote: > > On Nov 20, 2014, at 10:53 AM, Alexander Hansen > wrote: > >> Yeah, there’s no compelling reason not just to update daemonic appropriately >> for all supported OS X and avoid the potential pitfalls of creating the >> plists manually.

Re: [Fink-devel] Some perlmods to be Yosemified

> On Nov 13, 2014, at 1:16 PM, Alexander Hansen > wrote: > > I’m installing the perlmods needed for the mirror validation script in the > fink-mirrors source, and the following modules didn’t have pm5182 variants > yet: > > html-form-pm (Daniel J.) > http-response-encoding-pm (Daniel M.) >

Re: [Fink-devel] Results of 2014 Fink buildworld run on 10.9

On Aug 18, 2014, at 7:01 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > On 8/18/2014 1:47 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: >> A huge public "thank you" for doing this! >> >> While working on one of the warnings seen in: >> >> http://www.snaggledworks.com/fink/buildworld/2014-07-24/logs/io-aio-pm5124.log >> >>

Re: [Fink-devel] Issues for Yosemite.

On Jun 29, 2014, at 11:42 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > We've been discussing on IRC whether we want a new tree for 10.10's > packages and no upgrade from 10.9, or to allow an in-place upgrade from > 10.9 and keep their packaging in a common tree. > > One idea that came up was to have a 10.9

Re: [Fink-devel] Trouble installing Python 2.7

On Jun 24, 2014, at 11:35 AM, Scott Hannahs wrote: > Daniel, > > % fink list xcode > Information about 10616 packages read in 2 seconds. > i xcode 5.1.0.0.1.1396320587-1 >[virtual package representing the developer tools] > i xcode.app

Re: [Fink-devel] Trouble installing Python 2.7

On Jun 24, 2014, at 9:50 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 6/24/14, 6:30 AM, Daniel Johnson wrote: >> >> On Jun 24, 2014, at 12:05 AM, Alexander Hansen >> wrote: >> >>> On 6/23/14, 4:16 PM, Scott Hannahs wrote: >>>> I tried to update P

Re: [Fink-devel] Trouble installing Python 2.7

On Jun 24, 2014, at 12:05 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 6/23/14, 4:16 PM, Scott Hannahs wrote: >> I tried to update Python 2.7 and in amongst the long output I got a missing >> header file error. >> >> Mac OS X 10.8.5 >> fink self-update was run just previous to an update-all >> >> -Scott

Re: [Fink-devel] ld: library not found for -lserf-1

On Jun 14, 2014, at 10:39 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > Daniel, > Shouldn't the main libserf1 package contain a symlink at > %p/lib/libserf-1.dylib pointing at the %p/lib/libserf-1.0.4.3.0.dylib from > the libserf1-shlibs package? > Jack > File this under "Why yes, scons does i

Re: [Fink-devel] Circular dependency for python27 on Darwin13

On Jun 11, 2014, at 6:25 AM, Frava wrote: > Ok, thank you for the replies, and sorry for having posted here. I will now > wait for a fix. > > PS: Where do I have to report this kind of inconsistency in the Fink's > repository ? > > Regards, > Rafael Navaza. > > > 2014-06-11 9:19 GMT+02:00

Re: [Fink-devel] pyqt4-py27-4.10.4-1 failed

On Jun 7, 2014, at 9:14 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > On 6/7/2014 8:06 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote: >> >> On Jun 7, 2014, at 7:48 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> >>> Daniel, >>>The pyqt4-py27-4.10.4-1 packaging in the 10.7 tree is failing to

Re: [Fink-devel] pyqt4-py27-4.10.4-1 failed

On Jun 7, 2014, at 7:48 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > Daniel, >The pyqt4-py27-4.10.4-1 packaging in the 10.7 tree is failing to > build. Here on 10.8 against Xcode 5.1.1, it fails with… > > c++ -headerpad_max_install_names -L/sw/lib/system-openssl/lib -bundle > -L/sw/lib/python2.7/config

Re: [Fink-devel] PyQt-mac/x11 source/md5sum error

On Apr 5, 2014, at 5:44 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote: > > On Apr 5, 2014, at 5:32 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote: > >> >> On Apr 5, 2014, at 10:38 AM, Derek Homeier >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> there seems to be some mixup of the source

Re: [Fink-devel] PyQt-mac/x11 source/md5sum error

On Apr 5, 2014, at 5:32 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote: > > On Apr 5, 2014, at 10:38 AM, Derek Homeier > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> there seems to be some mixup of the source files and checksums for pyqt4: >> >> The checksum of the file PyQt-mac-gpl-4.10.4

Re: [Fink-devel] version conflicts with sip-pyNN-bin

On Apr 5, 2014, at 4:06 PM, Derek Homeier wrote: > fink update sip-py33-bin > > Information about 9023 packages read in 1 seconds. > The following package will be installed or updated: > sip-py33-bin > Reading bui

Re: [Fink-devel] PyQt-mac/x11 source/md5sum error

On Apr 5, 2014, at 10:38 AM, Derek Homeier wrote: > Hi, > > there seems to be some mixup of the source files and checksums for pyqt4: > > The checksum of the file PyQt-mac-gpl-4.10.4.tar.gz of package > pyqt4-py27-4.10.4-1 is incorrect. The most likely cause > for this is a corrupted or inco

Re: [Fink-devel] Killing python26

On Mar 23, 2014, at 4:36 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote: > > On Mar 23, 2014, at 8:31 AM, Derek Homeier > wrote: > >> On 20.03.2014, at 4:20PM, Daniel Johnson wrote: >> >>> I agree. There's no reason to keep 2.6 around as 2.7 is fully backward >>

Re: [Fink-devel] Killing python26

On Mar 23, 2014, at 8:31 AM, Derek Homeier wrote: > On 20.03.2014, at 4:20PM, Daniel Johnson wrote: > >> I agree. There's no reason to keep 2.6 around as 2.7 is fully backward >> compatible. >> > Just an aside, anyone aware of any major Linux distros that s

Re: [Fink-devel] Oh Whacking Day! (was Re: Killing python26)

On Mar 22, 2014, at 1:08 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: > [snip discussion of killing python] > > python26 (and db48*) are now no-longer-present on 10.7+ > >> It's also reasonable to kill 3.1 as it's now unsupported upstream. > 3.3 and the just released 3.4 will stay of course, but we might also >

Re: [Fink-devel] Killing python26

On Mar 20, 2014, at 9:40 AM, TheSin wrote: > I vote take out the axe, your python version options are getting out of hand > honestly. > --- > TS > http://www.southofheaven.org/ > Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! > > On Mar 20, 2014, at 12:13 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: >

Re: [Fink-devel] Best practices for Perl packages?

On Jan 2, 2014, at 8:37 AM, Charles Lepple wrote: > Hi all, > > I am looking at packaging ikiwiki, which depends on a bunch of Perl modules. > I am generally familiar with the Fink variants capabilities, but I am curious > to hear if anyone has any suggestions for choosing which Perl versions

Re: [Fink-devel] perl5162-core build/install problem on case-sensitiveFS

On Nov 19, 2013, at 8:53 PM, Derek Homeier wrote: > On 20.11.2013, at 2:29AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser > wrote: > >> On 11/19/2013 8:04 PM, Derek Homeier wrote: >>> But a lot of modules fail to build with this missing dependency on >>> cc_runtime.h. >>> There is no cc_runtime.h of either ca

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] 10.9 beta support

On Oct 28, 2013, at 5:58 AM, Remi Mommsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Oct 27, 2013, at 8:46 PM, Alexander Hansen > wrote: > >> We've added support for 10.9 into the master branch of the github >> repository (https://github.com/fink/fink). Folks that were using the >> "Futureproof2" feature branch

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink package uses PYTHONPATH in RuntimeVars

On Oct 4, 2013, at 5:00 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > Sounds simple and effective. So something like /sw/bin/systempython2.6? But > it won't work for people who run things like /usr/bin/python myscript.py > > .hc No, it won't, but there really isn't any way to do that which won't a

Re: [Fink-devel] [cvs] dists/10.7/stable/main/finkinfo/libs/pythonmods virtualenv-systempython.info, NONE, 1.1

On Sep 20, 2013, at 5:58 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > On Sep 20, 2013, at 4:37 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > >>> RuntimeVars: PYTHONPATH: %p/Library/Python/%type_raw[python]/site-packages >> >> Won't this break anything else that has already set PYTHONPATH? At >> least, yo

Re: [Fink-devel] EOL for 10.5 and 10.6

On Jun 20, 2013, at 9:15 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:52:10 -0700, David Lowe > wrote: > >> On Jun 19, 2013, at 8:02 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: >> >>> In view of simplifying our lives we've got a few options here: 1) EOL 10.5, and defer 10.6 for a while. This coul

Re: [Fink-devel] ping on git

On Jun 13, 2013, at 8:23 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > I'd like to try to move forward on getting the distribution files moved > over to git. Right now there is a selfupdate-git branch on fink's > github repository, but I don't know where we stand on functionality. > Last time I used it I w

Re: [Fink-devel] python packagers - please switch from using distribute back to setuptools

On Jun 12, 2013, at 11:15 AM, Kurt Schwehr wrote: > The author of distribute merged distribute back into setuptools 0.7 and took > over as lead of setuptools. Please convert python packages that use > distribute back to setuptools. > > Just committed setuptools 0.7.2 to 10.[78] and 10.[56].

Re: [Fink-devel] Clang 4.2 breaks python27 InfoTest

On Jan 29, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > Daniel, > The Xcode 4.6's clang breaks the InfoTest in python27 with the failure... > > test test_cmath failed -- Traceback (most recent call last): > File > "/sw/src/fink.build/python27-2.7.3-1/Python-2.7.3/Lib/test/test_cmath.py", > lin

Re: [Fink-devel] breakage from Xcode 4.6/Clang 4.2

On Jan 29, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:55:45AM -0500, Daniel Johnson wrote: >> >> On Jan 29, 2013, at 11:16 AM, Alexander Hansen >> wrote: >> >>> On 1/29/13 9:12 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>>> On Tue, Ja

Re: [Fink-devel] breakage from Xcode 4.6/Clang 4.2

t;Jack >> ps The net change to the info file is... >> >> --- db51-aes.info2012-01-17 12:19:49.0 -0500 >> +++ /sw/fink/10.7/local/main/finkinfo/db51-aes.info 2013-01-29 >> 11:06:57.0 -0500 >> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ >> Info4: <&

Re: [Fink-devel] sip-py and pyqt4-mac-py

On Jan 1, 2013, at 8:38 PM, BABA Yoshihiko wrote: > Daniel, > > Yet again qgis dependency issue. > > qgis17-py builddepends on a specific version set of sip-py (= 4.12.3) and > pyqt4-mac-py (= 4.8.6). Is it OK to keep these versions along the latest? > > Thanks > -- > BABA Yoshihiko > http

[Fink-devel] MIA for a while

If anyone is looking for me, I got a bit disrupted by hurricane Sandy here in Jersey. I'm safe and my house is undamaged but I won't have power for a while. They're saying 8-15 days. :( So much fun. Daniel -- Everyone ha

Re: [Fink-devel] Potential simplification for audacious2

On Sep 24, 2012, at 11:44 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > While I was looking at a build problem in audacious2, I took note of the > DescPackaging: > > audacious2-plugins Depends/BuildDepends on > audacious2-shlibs/audacious2-dev but the audacious2 binary requires > audacious2-plugins to run. So

[Fink-devel] Xcode 4.5. CVS on last legs?

Xcode 4.5 is out now for 10.7 and 10.8. One interesting thing I noticed in the release notes was this line: RCS and CVS are deprecated in this Xcode release. 12252058 This implies that Apple may be removing CVS from an upcoming Xcode version. Daniel ---

Re: [Fink-devel] openldap24-2.4.28-1 InfoTest failure on Xcode 4.4.1

On Aug 12, 2012, at 1:09 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > Is anyone else seeing openldap24-2.4.28-1 fail its InfoTest on Lion? With > Xcode 4.4.1 and the new Command Line Tools with Apple Clang 4.0, I see the > failure > > Restarting servers... > Starting server 1 on TCP/IP port 9011... > Using

Re: [Fink-devel] github?

imminent release of 10.8). >>> >>> The reason I say this is that we would need to write a selfupdate-git >>> function, and work through issues like how it interacts with >>> selfupdate-cvs, whether we are migrating everything or just the most recent >>&g

Re: [Fink-devel] [fink-core] RFC: readline6 package

On Jun 20, 2012, at 7:12 AM, Max Horn wrote: > Hi again, > > I've been working on making a readline6 package, but so far could only test > it on 10.6.8 (Intel / 64bit). I'd be grateful if people could test building > it on other configurations, in particular on 10.5 and on 10.7, and also in >

Re: [Fink-devel] Build of nmap fails MaxBuildJobs > 1

On Jun 5, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Scott Hannahs wrote: > When building nmap-6.00-4 on OS X 10.6.8 with gcc 4.2.1 it fails unless > MaxBuildJobs is set to 1. > > lastest "fink self-update" used. > > or at least it fails when MaxBuildJobs is 8 and it works when set to 1. > > Here is the relevant (I h

Re: [Fink-devel] openssl issue?

On May 10, 2012, at 11:25 AM, Andreas Bießmann wrote: > Dear Daniel Johnson, > > On 09.05.2012 19:08, Andreas Bießmann wrote: >> Dear Daniel Johnson, >> >> it seems to be related to openssl ... and since you are also the >> maintainer of openssl here is the ne

Re: [Fink-devel] Oracle Java 7u4 released

On Apr 27, 2012, at 5:21 PM, Stephen J. Butler wrote: > Anyone tried installing the new Oracle provided JRE/JDK? Thoughts on > how it might or might not interact with Fink? I installed it and fink doesn't even recognize that it's installed. It still shows 1.6.0 as the latest version. I'd suspec

Re: [Fink-devel] switch to framework python builds?

On Apr 11, 2012, at 11:04 AM, Daniel Macks wrote: > Isn't the actual only difference between "framework" and "library" the > difference between using -F/-framework vs -L/-l flags when linking? And the > binary library inside .framework is really just a .dylib by a different > filenaming scheme

Re: [Fink-devel] First round of Xcode results

On Mar 29, 2012, at 12:33 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > I decided not to wait the full 10 or so days it would require to do a > buildworld :-) > > One important result is the following: > > $ xcodebuild -version > Error: No developer directory found at > /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Develop

Re: [Fink-devel] sip-py24-4.13.2-1 fails to build

On Mar 18, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Daniel Johnson wrote: > > On Mar 18, 2012, at 8:26 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > >> On 03/17/2012 11:20 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote: >>> >>> On Mar 17, 2012, at 9:38 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: >>> >>

Re: [Fink-devel] sip-py24-4.13.2-1 fails to build

On Mar 18, 2012, at 8:26 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > On 03/17/2012 11:20 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote: >> >> On Mar 17, 2012, at 9:38 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: >> >>> Daniel, >>> >>> sip-py24 (need it as a dep for flyway-py) f

Re: [Fink-devel] sip-py24-4.13.2-1 fails to build

On Mar 17, 2012, at 9:38 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > Daniel, > > sip-py24 (need it as a dep for flyway-py) fails to build on 10.5/i386 > > c++ -c -pipe -fPIC -Os -w -DNDEBUG -I. -I/sw/include/python2.4 -o bool.o > bool.cpp > c++ -headerpad_max_install_names -bundle -o sip.so siplib.

Re: [Fink-devel] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: _Perl_Gthr_key_ptr

On Feb 19, 2012, at 9:05 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2/18/12 10:22 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> Interestingly this seems to be solved when I move /opt/local to >> /opt/local.off. Usually fink is pretty good about not running over >> and di

Re: [Fink-devel] avoid Xcode 4.3

On Feb 16, 2012, at 3:07 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > I would avoid Xcode 4.3 like the plague at the moment. The installation > via the App Store over Xcode 4.2.1 leaves the prior broken and the new > release unable to install its Command Line Tools (which are no longer > installed > by default).

Re: [Fink-devel] move libjpeg-turbo to stable?

On Jan 18, 2012, at 11:18 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 1/18/12 11:02 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> >> I'm packaging openni, which I'd like to link against >> libjpeg-turbo. libjpeg-turbo is in 10.7/stable but in unstable for >> < 10

Re: [Fink-devel] python26-2.6.7-2 test failure

On Jan 7, 2012, at 7:15 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > On 01/06/2012 7:49 PM, Daniel Johnson wrote: >> >> On Jan 6, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: >> >>> Failure on 10.7. 2.6.7-1 (before the cty

Re: [Fink-devel] python26-2.6.7-2 test failure

On Jan 6, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > Failure on 10.7. 2.6.7-1 (before the ctypes fix) built OK back in July. > > == > FAIL: test_byte (ctypes.test.test_cfuncs.CFunctions) >

Re: [Fink-devel] Version control migration?

erenced) > github.com offers the ability to access repositories via svn as well: > > <https://github.com/blog/626-announcing-svn-support> > > Since svn _is_ provided with 10.5+, having a selfupdate-svn would also > be a way to avoid making git essential. The example in t

Re: [Fink-devel] smake build fixed with Xcode 4.2

On Oct 13, 2011, at 12:35 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > FYI, the problems with cdrtools building under Lion should be resolved with > Xcode 4.2. > While I haven't tested that package yet, the underlying build issue with > smake contained > in cdrtools is now fixed. The attached packaging builds sm

Re: [Fink-devel] Phased decommissioning of the unstable tree.

On Oct 5, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Max Horn wrote: > Also, one "reverse" case: > > Validating package file ./stable/main/finkinfo/database/sqlite3-x86_64.info... > Error: can't find patchfile "./stable/main/finkinfo/database/sqlite3.patch" That's my fault. I just deleted sqlite3-x86_64.info since it'

Re: [Fink-devel] runtime issue involving graphicsmagick-shlibs-1.3.12-1

On Jul 28, 2011, at 5:01 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > I get a runtime error from drawtiming if using the libraries from > graphicsmagick-shlibs-1.3.12-1 (any Mac platform): > > $ drawtiming -o test.png /sw/share/drawtiming/samples/guenter.txt > Assertion failed: (semaphore_info != (SemaphoreInf

Re: [Fink-devel] libapr.0-dev-1.4.5-1 hardcodes fink's sed in itslibtool scripts:

On Jul 25, 2011, at 4:09 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:04:51 -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> It doesn't actually carry any dependency on sed itself, but when I tried >> to build a package that depends on libapr.0 (libser

Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: Re: [Fink-users] mplayer fails to compile

On Jun 6, 2011, at 11:49 PM, Daniel Macks wrote: > On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 10:50:46 -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote: >> >> OK, it's been more than a month since I sent this. I haven't gotten >> anything from the listed mplayer maintainer. (cc'ed on this message). >> >> If we can't fix this, is t

  1   2   3   >