Re: [Fink-devel] ghostscript 8.61-3 oddities

2008-03-22 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Mar 22, 2008, at 3:25 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: > It's actually a ghostscript-8.61-4 oddity, but was probably there > before: Updating fails for me with the message > > Preparing to replace ghostscript 8.61-3 (using .../ > ghostscript_8.61-4_darwin-i386.deb) ... > Unpacking replacement gho

Re: [Fink-devel] ghostscript 8.61-3 oddities

2008-03-21 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Mar 21, 2008, at 3:17 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > > On Mar 21, 2008, at 5:31 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > >> Does anyone know why when installing ghostscript 8.61-3 in fink >> 10.5 unstable, >> the following dpkg warnings appear? >> >> Preparing to replace ghostscript 8.61-3 (using .../ >> gh

Re: [Fink-devel] finkproject.org Home page broken?

2008-01-20 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Jan 20, 2008, at 10:36 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: > John Ridgway wrote: >> When I direct Safari to www.finkproject.org I get the following >> undesirable result: >> >> Fatal error: Call to undefined function insert_sub() in /var/www/ >> www.finkproject.org/header.inc >> on line 359 >> >> Is

Re: [Fink-devel] tex4ht source changed (again)

2007-10-09 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Oct 9, 2007, at 2:34 PM, Jens Noeckel wrote: > > On Oct 9, 2007, at 2:29 PM, Jens Noeckel wrote: > >> Hi, >> I had trouble updating tex4ht from unstable (OS X 10.4) because the >> source wasn't found. I guess after a recent fix the new source has >>

Re: [Fink-devel] tex4ht source changed (again)

2007-10-09 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Oct 9, 2007, at 2:29 PM, Jens Noeckel wrote: > Hi, > I had trouble updating tex4ht from unstable (OS X 10.4) because the > source wasn't found. I guess after a recent fix the new source has > been renamed (and replaced). > Things installed fine after I changed the sou

[Fink-devel] tex4ht source changed (again)

2007-10-09 Thread Jens Noeckel
Hi, I had trouble updating tex4ht from unstable (OS X 10.4) because the source wasn't found. I guess after a recent fix the new source has been renamed (and replaced). Things installed fine after I changed the source and md5 checksum appropriately as shown in the patch below. The new version

Re: [Fink-devel] pstoedit-3.44-1003

2007-07-28 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Jul 28, 2007, at 9:25 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 7/27/07, Andrew Henrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> To whom it may concern: >> >> >> >> >> >> pstoedit it broken with respect to the latest gs interpreter >> (ghostscript=8.57-1) under the unstable branch on fink. >> >> >> >> >> Th

Re: [Fink-devel] gc fails to build with XCode 2.3

2007-07-21 Thread Jens Noeckel
;ve received a few private bug > reports about the new gc package. If I can't resolve them soon, I > may remove the package from fink. > > -- Dave > > > On Jul 19, 2007, at 3:05 PM, Jens Noeckel wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> gc (7.0-1001) compiles fi

[Fink-devel] gc fails to build with XCode 2.3

2007-07-19 Thread Jens Noeckel
Hi, gc (7.0-1001) compiles fine with XCode 2.4 on an Intel Core Duo machine, but fails to compile on the same architecture with Xcode 2.3, where I have gcc version: i686-apple-darwin8-gcc-4.0.1 (GCC) 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5341). I guess this is again related to the question of h

Re: [Fink-devel] ghostscript

2006-09-04 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Sep 4, 2006, at 1:40 PM, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sep 4, 2006, at 4:30 PM, Jens Noeckel wrote: > >> Logic then dictates that I should go even further and remove the >> BuildDepends on libjpeg and libp

Re: [Fink-devel] ghostscript

2006-09-04 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Sep 4, 2006, at 3:28 AM, Jean-François Mertens wrote: > Hi, > > disabling jasper doesn't seem the right way to solve a > buildconflict... > The -I/sw/include flags remain before the -I. flags, and since god > knows > what could be in /sw/include (eg, from a user's local pkgs), the > pro

Re: [Fink-devel] ghostscript-8.54-1

2006-09-03 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Sep 3, 2006, at 4:34 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 9/3/06, Peter Dyballa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello! >> >> When trying an update-all after a selfupdate, this failed because >> libjasper1 had to be removed – and it is too hard to ask my >> permission? Even the package gets re-instal

Re: [Fink-devel] newly orphaned packages

2006-09-01 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Aug 31, 2006, at 6:34 AM, Jeff Whitaker wrote: > > All: I'm giving up the following packages: > ghostscript > ghostscript-fonts > > The Maintainer field for these has been set to > > None Jeff (or rather ): just to let you know, I've updated the ghostscript.info to the newest version 8.

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] sodipodi Bus Error on MacIntel

2006-07-15 Thread Jens Noeckel
On Jul 15, 2006, at 4:10 PM, Jens Noeckel wrote: > After a fink selfupdate and update-all from unstable (fink > 0.8.1.rsync i386), I installed sodipodi-0.34-1014. I have XCode 2.3, > the gcc compiler shows version > i686-apple-darwin8-gcc-4.0.1 (GCC) 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc.

[Fink-devel] Build fails for sdl-ttf

2006-07-15 Thread Jens Noeckel
Hi, With an-up-to-date fink (unstable) on both PPC and intel machines, I tried to install sdl-ttf but got the following linker error (on both systems): gcc -g -O2 -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include/freetype2 -I/sw/ include/SDL -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -D_THREAD_SAFE -DHAVE_OPENGL -L/sw/lib -

[Fink-devel] sodipodi Bus Error on MacIntel

2006-07-15 Thread Jens Noeckel
After a fink selfupdate and update-all from unstable (fink 0.8.1.rsync i386), I installed sodipodi-0.34-1014. I have XCode 2.3, the gcc compiler shows version i686-apple-darwin8-gcc-4.0.1 (GCC) 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5341) The program starts up and shows the menu interface. But I