Re: [Fink-devel] An update to SBCL to allow building with Xcode 8 is on the Fink tracker

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016, at 06:29 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > https://sourceforge.net/p/fink/package-submissions/4715/ > > > I’ve attached an updated maxima to that item, so feel free to add that > simultaneously with sbcl. Thanks,

Re: [Fink-devel] glib2 is out of date

Alexander Hansen writes: > On 8/13/14, 2:01 PM, David Lowe wrote: >> Greetings! >> >> The latest build of freeciv will require glib2 >= 2.32. I am >> currently downloading 2.32.2, but Gnome has a bewildering variety of >> versions up to 2.41, and i don't see an

[Fink-devel] coreutils-default missing base64

I just noticed that gbase64 is available in coreutils, but the analogue in coreutils-default is missing. The DescDetails talks about a conflict with the base64 package, but it seems that package is no longer available. http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/browse.php?summary=base64 Any chance of

Re: [Fink-devel] trouble installing emacs24

On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser f...@snaggledworks.com wrote: On 6/23/2014 12:15 AM, Jesse Alama wrote: I see that Emacs 24 was recently made available as a Fink package (thanks!). I had some trouble installing on my 10.9.2 MacBook Pro: after building, I see

[Fink-devel] trouble installing emacs24

I see that Emacs 24 was recently made available as a Fink package (thanks!). I had some trouble installing on my 10.9.2 MacBook Pro: after building, I see this: [...] Selecting previously deselected package emacs24. (Reading database ... 213203 files and directories currently installed.)

[Fink-devel] new version of m4 available: 1.4.17

The current version of m4 in Fink is 1.4.16; looks like 1.4.17 is available upstream. Jesse -- Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how

[Fink-devel] coreutils update: latest version is 8.21 (we have 8.19)

The latest coreutils (and coreutils-default) in Fink is version 8.19. Looks like the latest version is 8.21. Anyone care to update this one? Thanks, Jesse -- October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars

Re: [Fink-devel] [cvs] dists/10.7/stable/main/finkinfo/languages sbcl-x86_64.info, 1.12, 1.13

No problem, should be ok also on 10.6. On Sep 7, 2013, at 22:38, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com wrote: On 9/7/13 6:22 AM, Jesse Alama wrote: Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.7/stable/main/finkinfo/languages In directory sfp-cvs-1.v30.ch3.sourceforge.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8650

Re: [Fink-devel] Couple of sbcl -related matters.

On Mar 5, 2013, at 8:32 PM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com wrote: On 3/1/13 6:48 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: On 3/1/13 4:25 AM, Jesse Alama wrote: On Feb 28, 2013, at 3:20 AM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I wanted to do a few things with sbcl

Re: [Fink-devel] Couple of sbcl -related matters.

On Feb 28, 2013, at 3:20 AM, Alexander Hansen alexanderk.han...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I wanted to do a few things with sbcl, if you're OK with them: 1) Sync the current version (1.1.5) to i386 and x86_64 builds in the 10.4/ tree. Sounds good. I'd do this myself, but I don't have access

[Fink-devel] coreutils: upstream has version 8.12 (we're at version 8.10)

Just pinging the core devel team to let them know about a newer version of GNU coreutils (8.12). -- Jesse Alama http://centria.di.fct.unl.pt/~alama/ -- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously

[Fink-devel] emacs 23.3

Looks like emacs23 in fink is lagging behind upstream: latest version is 23.3, but we've got 23.1. -- Jesse Alama http://centria.di.fct.unl.pt/~alama/ -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure

Re: [Fink-devel] coreutils maintainer

Yeah, I just got it myself this afternoon doing a fink selfupdate; fink update-all. Works just fine. Alexander Hansen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2/12/11 12:29 PM, Jesse Alama wrote: I can't get an unpatched 8.10 to build on my 10.6.6 machine; one of the tests

Re: [Fink-devel] coreutils maintainer

: On Feb 9, 2011, at 4:22 PM, Jesse Alama wrote: I tried getting in touch with the coreutils maintainer, Shinra Aida, at shi...@j10n.org, but this email address seems to be invalid.  Does anyone have updated contact information for Shinra?  I'd like to upgrade coreutils to version 8.9

Re: [Fink-devel] Problem installing sbcl [Bug in dpkg?]

On 2010-01-03 17:11:55 +, Martin Costabel said: Martin Costabel wrote: [] On 10.6/32bit: Builds but doesn't install Unpacking sbcl (from .../sbcl_1.0.34-1_darwin-i386.deb) ... ### execution of /sw32/bin/dpkg-lockwait failed, exit code 6 /sw32/bin/dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by

Re: [Fink-devel] SBCL 1.0.29 building on MacOS 10.6.2 with fink

ccing Jesse Alama, as the maintainer for the SBCL Intel package, as well as fink-devel. I have no time to deal with this right now. I'm going to traveling to a meeting tomorrow, and won't be back until midweek next week. You're going to need to rename the files, if they actually have

Re: [Fink-devel] SBCL-1.0.25/Intel on the tracker

, maxima, and wxmaxima packages over to the stable tree, if there are no objections. -- Alexander Hansen Fink User Liaison -- Jesse Alama al...@stanford.edu -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY

Re: [Fink-devel] upgrading gettext to 0.17

Alexander Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Aug 23, 2008, at 8:29 PM, Jesse Alama wrote: I've got a package (wesnoth) that requires a newer gettext than what we've got. As it stands now, our msgfmt fails when generating some new localization message files. Any chance of uprading

[Fink-devel] upgrading gettext to 0.17

I've got a package (wesnoth) that requires a newer gettext than what we've got. As it stands now, our msgfmt fails when generating some new localization message files. Any chance of uprading to, say, version 0.17? (That version has been out for several months.) Thanks, Jesse -- Jesse Alama

Re: [Fink-devel] trouble building wxgtk2.8-2.8.7-18 on 10.5.4 macbook pro

-2.0 -L%p/lib/gstreamer-0.10 -- Jesse Alama ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand

[Fink-devel] texinfo and m4 conflicting

/charset.alias', which is also in package m4 /sw/bin/dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Any ideas for how to get around this one? Jesse -- Jesse Alama ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Check out the new

Re: [Fink-devel] texinfo and m4 conflicting

Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jesse Alama wrote: It looks like the latest texinfo (4.11-1001) and m4 (1.4.10-1) are conflicting with each other: Preparing to replace texinfo 4.8a-1003 (using .../texinfo_4.11-1001_darwin-i386.deb) ... install-info(texinfo): deleting entry

[Fink-devel] trouble building imagemagick 6.3.8-1001

, Jesse -- Jesse Alama ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01

Re: [Fink-devel] dpkg-deb: use --no-unquote as argument to tar

for mizar, which I have already packaged (see http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/browse.php?summary=mizar) Jesse -- Jesse Alama ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R

[Fink-devel] dpkg-deb: use --no-unquote as argument to tar

that require that the --no-unquote flag be absent? Jesse -- Jesse Alama ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go

Re: [Fink-devel] dpkg-deb: use --no-unquote as argument to tar

Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 03:22:48PM -0800, Jesse Alama wrote: [snip good rationale for...] The relevant code change is in line 450 of build.c in the subdirectory dpkg-deb of version 1.10.21 of dpkg: execlp(TAR,tar,-cf, -, --null, -T

Re: [Fink-devel] dpkg-deb: use --no-unquote as argument to tar

Peter O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jesse Alama wrote: Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 03:22:48PM -0800, Jesse Alama wrote: [snip good rationale for...] The relevant code change is in line 450 of build.c in the subdirectory dpkg-deb of version 1.10.21

Re: [Fink-devel] New funny warning

back. At least every second time I build something, I get this warning. BTW, today it's 422 days. -- Martin Same here, except it reports 266 days for me. For me it's 282. Jesse -- Jesse Alama ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) *116: Invalid qua (http://www.mizar.org

Re: [Fink-devel] patch: handle tbz files

Max Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Am 05.03.2007 um 02:41 schrieb Jesse Alama: Currently fink doesn't recognize tbz files. From what I can tell, the only change to get Fink to recognize this is in PkgVersion.pm; the diff is: Interesting. I never saw a .tbz file, ever -- any examples

Re: [Fink-devel] patch: handle tbz files

Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:24:28AM -0800, Jesse Alama wrote: Max Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Am 05.03.2007 um 02:41 schrieb Jesse Alama: Currently fink doesn't recognize tbz files. From what I can tell, the only change to get Fink

[Fink-devel] patch: handle tbz files

-- Jesse Alama ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) *143: No implicit qualification (http://www.mizar.org) - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your

[Fink-devel] handle tgz files

$/) { is enough. Jesse -- Jesse Alama ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) *14: Too many terms in an inference (http://www.mizar.org) - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.4-transitional/unstable/main/finkinfo/net erc.info,NONE,1.1 erc.patch,NONE,1.1

Sébastien Maret [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Dec 15, 2005, at 22:44, Jesse Alama wrote: Sébastien Maret [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Dec 15, 2005, at 15:57, Brendan Cully wrote: On Thursday, 15 December 2005 at 15:52, Sebastien Maret wrote: The following message is a courtesy copy

[Fink-devel] question about a particular license

presume that this is an open-source license, and that the licensed software can be included in the Fink distribution. What value for the `License' field should I use in the package's info file? Does `DFSG-Approved' make sense? Thanks, Jesse -- Jesse Alama ([EMAIL PROTECTED

[Fink-devel] build error: directory

a few minutes ago, so I ought to have newest fink. Here's the fink package description file `emacs-wiki.info' I've prepared: Package: emacs-wiki Version: 2.68 Revision: 1 Description: Maintain a local wiki with emacs License: GPL Maintainer: Jesse Alama [EMAIL PROTECTED] Depends: emacsen Source