Re: [Fink-devel] An update to SBCL to allow building with Xcode 8 is on the Fink tracker

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016, at 06:29 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > https://sourceforge.net/p/fink/package-submissions/4715/ > > > I’ve attached an updated maxima to that item, so feel free to add that > simultaneously with sbcl. Thanks, checke

Re: [Fink-devel] glib2 is out of date

Alexander Hansen writes: > On 8/13/14, 2:01 PM, David Lowe wrote: >> Greetings! >> >> The latest build of freeciv will require glib2 >= 2.32. I am >> currently downloading 2.32.2, but Gnome has a bewildering variety of >> versions up to 2.41, and i don't see an obvious demarcation of >> sta

[Fink-devel] coreutils-default missing base64

I just noticed that gbase64 is available in coreutils, but the analogue in coreutils-default is missing. The DescDetails talks about a conflict with the base64 package, but it seems that package is no longer available. http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/browse.php?summary=base64 Any chance of putt

[Fink-devel] trouble with boost 1.53

I'm working on updating a package of mine (ledger) that uses the boost C++ suite (I'm using boost1.53.python27) as well as libicu48. I'm having some trouble with the build and can't quite tell where the problem lies. Consider this minature C++ program badboost.cpp (which occurs as one of the p

Re: [Fink-devel] trouble installing emacs24

On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > On 6/23/2014 12:15 AM, Jesse Alama wrote: >> >> I see that Emacs 24 was recently made available as a Fink package >> (thanks!). I had some trouble installing on my 10.9.2 MacBook Pro: >>

[Fink-devel] trouble installing emacs24

I see that Emacs 24 was recently made available as a Fink package (thanks!). I had some trouble installing on my 10.9.2 MacBook Pro: after building, I see this: [...] Selecting previously deselected package emacs24. (Reading database ... 213203 files and directories currently installed.) Unpackin

[Fink-devel] new version of m4 available: 1.4.17

The current version of m4 in Fink is 1.4.16; looks like 1.4.17 is available upstream. Jesse -- Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how appli

[Fink-devel] coreutils update: latest version is 8.21 (we have 8.19)

The latest coreutils (and coreutils-default) in Fink is version 8.19. Looks like the latest version is 8.21. Anyone care to update this one? Thanks, Jesse -- October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars ca

Re: [Fink-devel] [cvs] dists/10.7/stable/main/finkinfo/languages sbcl-x86_64.info, 1.12, 1.13

No problem, should be ok also on 10.6. On Sep 7, 2013, at 22:38, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 9/7/13 6:22 AM, Jesse Alama wrote: >> Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.7/stable/main/finkinfo/languages >> In directory sfp-cvs-1.v30.ch3.sourceforge.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8650 >&g

Re: [Fink-devel] Couple of sbcl -related matters.

On Mar 5, 2013, at 8:32 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 3/1/13 6:48 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: >> On 3/1/13 4:25 AM, Jesse Alama wrote: >>> On Feb 28, 2013, at 3:20 AM, Alexander Hansen >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi. I wanted to do a few things

Re: [Fink-devel] Couple of sbcl -related matters.

On Feb 28, 2013, at 3:20 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > Hi. I wanted to do a few things with sbcl, if you're OK with them: > > 1) Sync the current version (1.1.5) to i386 and x86_64 builds in the > 10.4/ tree. Sounds good. I'd do this myself, but I don't have access to a non-64-bit machine

[Fink-devel] coreutils: upstream has version 8.12 (we're at version 8.10)

Just pinging the core devel team to let them know about a newer version of GNU coreutils (8.12). -- Jesse Alama http://centria.di.fct.unl.pt/~alama/ -- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously

[Fink-devel] emacs 23.3

Looks like emacs23 in fink is lagging behind upstream: latest version is 23.3, but we've got 23.1. -- Jesse Alama http://centria.di.fct.unl.pt/~alama/ -- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastru

[Fink-devel] Fwd: updating bibtex2html to version 1.96

1.96 To: Jesse Alama Hello Jesse, I don't use fink any more, feel free to contribute by becoming the new maintainer of that package...  It could be usefull to others... Have a nice day, Jean Baptiste PS: DVM SPIRO SPERO :) Le 3 avr. 11 à 17:56, Jesse Alama a écrit : > Hi Jean-

Re: [Fink-devel] coreutils maintainer

Yeah, I just got it myself this afternoon doing a fink selfupdate; fink update-all. Works just fine. Alexander Hansen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2/12/11 12:29 PM, Jesse Alama wrote: >> I can't get an unpatched 8.10 to build on my 10.

Re: [Fink-devel] coreutils maintainer

gt; -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> On 2/9/11 6:43 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: >>>> On Feb 9, 2011, at 4:22 PM, Jesse Alama wrote: >>>> >>>>> I tried getting in touch with the coreutils maintainer, Shinra Aida,

Re: [Fink-devel] coreutils maintainer

t;> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 2/9/11 6:43 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: >> > On Feb 9, 2011, at 4:22 PM, Jesse Alama wrote: >> > >> >> I tried getting in touch with the coreutils maintainer, Shinra Aida, >> >> at >> >> shi...@j10n.org, but t

[Fink-devel] coreutils maintainer

I tried getting in touch with the coreutils maintainer, Shinra Aida, at shi...@j10n.org, but this email address seems to be invalid. Does anyone have updated contact information for Shinra? I'd like to upgrade coreutils to version 8.9 (the current upstream version). --

Re: [Fink-devel] Problem installing sbcl [Bug in dpkg?]

On 2010-01-03 17:11:55 +, Martin Costabel said: > Martin Costabel wrote: > [] >> On 10.6/32bit: Builds but doesn't install >> >>> Unpacking sbcl (from .../sbcl_1.0.34-1_darwin-i386.deb) ... >>> ### execution of /sw32/bin/dpkg-lockwait failed, exit code 6 >>> /sw32/bin/dpkg-deb: subprocess pas

Re: [Fink-devel] Problem installing sbcl

On Jan 1, 2010, at 9:12 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: > Martin Costabel wrote: >> Alexander Hansen wrote: >> [] >>> I was told that the package functioned on 10.6/64-bit. I didn't have >>> time actually to verify that on a clean 10.6 system at that time, but >>> verified that it works on 10.5; I app

Re: [Fink-devel] SBCL 1.0.29 building on MacOS 10.6.2 with fink

bit. There is yet to be a solution developed to build 1.0.32 on 10.6.X. >> >> Leigh >> -- >> Leigh M. Smith >> mailto:le...@leighsmith.com >> http://www.leighsmith.com >> skype:aussieleighsmith >> >> >> > ccing Jesse Alama, as the

Re: [Fink-devel] SBCL-1.0.25/Intel on the tracker

;d like to > have a > report from somebody with access to that platform. > 3) I'd like to roll the current sbcl, maxima, and wxmaxima packages > over to the stable tree, if there are no objections. > > -- > Alexander Hansen > Fink User Liaison > -- Jesse Alama al..

Re: [Fink-devel] upgrading gettext to 0.17

Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Aug 23, 2008, at 8:29 PM, Jesse Alama wrote: > >> I've got a package (wesnoth) that requires a newer gettext than what >> we've got. As it stands now, our msgfmt fails when generating some >> new >&

[Fink-devel] upgrading gettext to 0.17

I've got a package (wesnoth) that requires a newer gettext than what we've got. As it stands now, our msgfmt fails when generating some new localization message files. Any chance of uprading to, say, version 0.17? (That version has been out for several months.) Thanks, Jesse -- J

Re: [Fink-devel] trouble building wxgtk2.8-2.8.7-18 on 10.5.4 macbook pro

ConfigureParams: << >--with-extra-includes=%p/include --with-extra-libs=%p/lib > --disable-dependency-tracking --disable-debug --disable-debug_flag \ >--disable-debug_info --disable-monolithic --disable-

Re: [Fink-devel] texinfo and m4 conflicting

Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jesse Alama wrote: >> It looks like the latest texinfo (4.11-1001) and m4 (1.4.10-1) are >> conflicting with each other: >> >> Preparing to replace texinfo 4.8a-1003 (using >> .../texinfo_4.11-1001_darwi

[Fink-devel] texinfo and m4 conflicting

rwrite `/sw/lib/charset.alias', which is also in package m4 /sw/bin/dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Any ideas for how to get around this one? Jesse -- Jesse Alama ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ---

[Fink-devel] trouble building imagemagick 6.3.8-1001

7; undeclared (first use in this function) magick/type.c:736: error: 'FC_SLANT_OBLIQUE' undeclared (first use in this function) magick/type.c:779: warning: implicit declaration of function 'FcFontSetDestroy' make[1]: *** [magick/magick_libMagickCore_la-

Re: [Fink-devel] dpkg-deb: use --no-unquote as argument to tar

ng in dpkg. I agree with Martin that, as it stands now, dpkg's operation isn't very logical. I did some searching on the debian mailing lists to see if there was any mention of the --no-unquote tar option, but I was unable to find any message where the developers took a stand on what t

Re: [Fink-devel] dpkg-deb: use --no-unquote as argument to tar

Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jesse Alama wrote: >> Daniel Macks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 03:22:48PM -0800, Jesse Alama wrote: >>> [snip good rationale for...] >>>> The relevant code

Re: [Fink-devel] dpkg-deb: use --no-unquote as argument to tar

Daniel Macks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 03:22:48PM -0800, Jesse Alama wrote: > [snip good rationale for...] >> The relevant code change is in line 450 of build.c in the >> subdirectory dpkg-deb of version 1.10.21 of dpkg: >> >>

[Fink-devel] dpkg-deb: use --no-unquote as argument to tar

quot;tar","-cf", "-", "--null", "-T", "-", "--no-recursion", (char*)0); What would be the consequences of adding this flag to the invocation of tar? Do we know of any packages that require that the --no-unquote flag be absent? Jesse --

Re: [Fink-devel] New funny warning

Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jesse Alama wrote: >> Stan Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [] >>> Same here, except it reports 266 days for me. >> >> For me it's 282. > > I am curious what > >stat /sw/f

Re: [Fink-devel] New funny warning

>>> >>>> Someone can't count, it seems. >>> >>> I believe the new code that touches the index file didn't exist until >>> you updated, next time you selfupdate it should go away... >> >> ...and it comes back. At least every second ti

Re: [Fink-devel] patch: handle tbz files

Daniel Macks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:24:28AM -0800, Jesse Alama wrote: >> Max Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Am 05.03.2007 um 02:41 schrieb Jesse Alama: >> > >> >> Currently fink doesn't rec

Re: [Fink-devel] patch: handle tbz files

Max Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Am 05.03.2007 um 02:41 schrieb Jesse Alama: > >> Currently fink doesn't recognize tbz files. From what I can tell, the >> only change to get Fink to recognize this is in PkgVersion.pm; the >> diff is: > Interesting

[Fink-devel] patch: handle tbz files

x27;s and tgz's.) Jesse -- Jesse Alama ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) *143: No implicit qualification (http://www.mizar.org) - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and y

[Fink-devel] handle tgz files

$/) { is enough. Jesse -- Jesse Alama ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) *14: Too many terms in an inference (http://www.mizar.org) - Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.4-transitional/unstable/main/finkinfo/net erc.info,NONE,1.1 erc.patch,NONE,1.1

ve 2005-12-14 16:42:34.0 -0800 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +#!/bin/bash -e +# +# This is the Fink version of the erc emacs package. +set -o posix + +FLAVOR=${1} + +echo "remove/erc: Handling removal for emacsen flavor ${FLAVOR}" + +if [ ${FLAVOR} == emacs20 ] +then +echo "remove/erc: Skipping unsupported flavor ${FLAVOR}" +exit 0 +fi + +echo >&2 -n "remove/erc: Purging compilation log and byte-compiled files for ${FLAVOR}..." +rm -f @PREFIX@/share/doc/erc/CompilationLog-${FLAVOR}.gz +rm -Rf @PREFIX@/share/${FLAVOR}/site-lisp/erc +echo >&2 "done." + +exit 0 -- Jesse Alama ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

[Fink-devel] Re: dists/10.4-transitional/unstable/main/finkinfo/net erc.info,NONE,1.1 erc.patch,NONE,1.1

Sébastien Maret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Dec 15, 2005, at 22:44, Jesse Alama wrote: > >> Sébastien Maret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> On Dec 15, 2005, at 15:57, Brendan Cully wrote: >>> >>>> On Thursday, 15 December 2005

[Fink-devel] question about a particular license

SG license requirements, but I'm not sure. I presume that this is an open-source license, and that the licensed software can be included in the Fink distribution. What value for the `License' field should I use in the package's info file? Does `DFSG-Approved

[Fink-devel] build error: "directory

; and `fink update-all' just a few minutes ago, so I ought to have newest fink. Here's the fink package description file `emacs-wiki.info' I've prepared: Package: emacs-wiki Version: 2.68 Revision: 1 Description: Maintain a local wiki with emacs License: GPL Maintainer: Jesse