Re: [Fink-devel] Checksum problem

2003-03-30 Thread Justin Hallett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~]$ fink checksums Information about 2330 packages read in 10 seconds. Checksum of tarball /sw/src/povuni_s.tgz of package povray-3.1-6 is incorrect. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [~]$ -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -=[JFH] Blue Falls Manufacturing Ltd. -=[JFH] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

[Fink-devel] basefiles

2003-03-20 Thread Justin Hallett
for proftpd and gproftpd I require /etc/shells and /etc/ftpusers for read write, and staying with the fink tradition I'd like to move these files into %p/etc as to no modify system files, I have a copy of proftpd and gproftpd in my experimental dir that use %p/etc and in the proftpd install I use t

Re: [Fink-devel] packages KDE 3.1 needs before a stable move

2003-03-09 Thread Justin Hallett
fixed to use python22 and in stable now. Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > pilot-link9 (wants python23) -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -=[JFH] Blue Falls Manufacturing Ltd. -=[JFH] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponso

Re: [Fink-devel] packaging problem

2003-03-05 Thread Justin Hallett
this is why we have the flag IMHO, else we'd make the buildonlydepends flag in fink, all -dev pkgs = buildonly depend :) we figured there would be rare cases where this wouldn't be so and left the feild to the maintainer's disgrestion :) That is my stand on it. "David R. Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [Fink-devel] Epoch

2003-03-04 Thread Justin Hallett
nope, it does work causes - is higher then R Kyle Moffett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >I don't think that will work, as 8RC2 > 8 from dpkg's point of view. >This should >have originally been done as > %v=1.2.7. %r=1.2.8rc2-1 > or > %v=1.2.8 %r=0-1.2.8rc2-1 -=[JFH] Justin

Re: [Fink-devel] Epoch

2003-03-04 Thread Justin Hallett
I'm about to release proftpd 1.2.8 final and RC2 is in unstable ATM and this is what I'm gonna do, unless someone objects in the next hmm 30 minutes :) Current: 1.2.8RC2-1 New: 1.2.8-Final-1 Kyle Moffett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Here is something I have seen done with Debian. It makes >less

Re: [Fink-devel] Epoch

2003-03-03 Thread Justin Hallett
okay %e is great thanks...and I agree, but I think it will be used, I have a number of rc pkgs. Max Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Yes there is: %e (see PkgVersion.pm, line 136). > >>Cause I think it'd be nice to have if we start using Epoch more and more. > >Well, epochs should only be used as

Re: [Fink-devel] Epoch

2003-03-03 Thread Justin Hallett
hehe np, I was just listing them for dmalloc to document or to have record of it for others... is there an Epoch version percent expantion var? Cause I think it'd be nice to have if we start using Epoch more and more. Max Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Yup yup, it still needs to be properly do

[Fink-devel] Epoch

2003-03-03 Thread Justin Hallett
since I think i was the first to try and use the new Epoch in fink 0.12, I think the docs are very limited and completly unclear. First there should be an example secondly ppl must know to add it to the Splittoffs as well as the Main pkg depending on the shlibs should have Depends: %N-shlibs (= :%

[Fink-devel] linking questions

2003-02-28 Thread Justin Hallett
Makefile: libfoo_la_LDFLAGS = \ -version-info 1:0:0 \ -export-symbols foo.exp -export-dynamic \ -module this makes libfoo.so, libfoo.1.so and libfoo.1.0.0.so which doesn't seems right to me for a plugin. I remember Clef saying something about -export-dynamic and -module o

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: doxygen

2003-02-24 Thread Justin Hallett
on my Ti ( main install pdflatex is in tetex-base) but I just tried to build doxygen on my build box which is building everything from scratch and it seems pdflatex isn't in tetex-nox which is what I thought the problem was, just it's not in tetex-base which I had installed this time and got to sam

[Fink-devel] Re: doxygen

2003-02-24 Thread Justin Hallett
I figured out that pdflatex is in tetex-base and not tetex-nox, so doxygen needs to depend on -base it seems though this could be a tetex issue so I'll cross post this to the devel list as well. Justin Hallett writes: >Hi I'm checking all the depends in unstable, and I found

[Fink-devel] C++ problems

2003-02-09 Thread Justin Hallett
C++ problems, any takers? Error index.cc: In constructor `Index::Index(Indexes*, GAptPkgTree*, Filter*)': index.cc:56: declaration of `tree' shadows a parameter make[3]: *** [index.o] Error 1 Code Index::Index(Indexes* indexes, GAptPkgTree* tree, Filter* filter) : indexes_(indexe

Re: [Fink-devel] init.(c)sh

2003-02-08 Thread Justin Hallett
hehe okay I guess I won't :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >I prepared two patch files for init.(c)sh, but I cannot attach them to >the tracker item. I suppose because it is a feature request. I have no >permission to change it. Could anyone of the developers change that? -=[JFH] Justin F. Halle

Re: [Fink-devel] init.(c)sh

2003-02-08 Thread Justin Hallett
I'll fix the sh variant some time in the next two days, but some one will have to translate it to the csh version. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Maybe you can just open a new "patch tracker" item and post your code >there. >We'll clean up the various tracker items later. -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett

Re: [Fink-devel] m2crypto and the new openssl

2003-02-07 Thread Justin Hallett
when trying with the 097 pkg you do have openssl097-dev installed at the build time right? And maybe sending us the error would help. It would be best if it used 097. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Could someone try to install the current m2crypto package and report >success or failure for me? -=[J

Re: [Fink-devel] Porting Nagios (was netsaint) and doing it right...

2003-02-06 Thread Justin Hallett
everyone has perl so just embedded it as a default and only make 3 still. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> nagios-mysql-embeddedPerl >> >> nagios-postgresql-embe. and so on? > >If you want to do it, that's the way to go. Of course then you have 6 >packages already. -=[JFH] Justin F.

Re: [Fink-devel] package manager stable?

2003-02-05 Thread Justin Hallett
I agree with Max, it need a full rewrite, but the base idea is there I think I need to meet Max in IRC again first though. But I have lots of pkgs to update first anyhow likely won't even think about it till Saturday. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >No way, that is not even close to being releasable c

Re: [Fink-devel] package manager stable?

2003-02-05 Thread Justin Hallett
I'll start re working that as soon as i get all my pkgs updated :) I finally got pilot-link into unstable *phew* [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Justin, what about your mirror thing too? -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -=[JFH] Blue Falls Manufacturing Ltd. -=[JFH] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Fink-devel] package manager stable?

2003-02-05 Thread Justin Hallett
I think my cvs patch could make 0.12 as well, I'll add it to the tacker. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >more till we release 0.12 - I want to add Ben's epoch support first -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -=[JFH] Blue Falls Manufacturing Ltd. -=[JFH] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: [Fink-devel] Regression caused by indexing changes

2003-01-27 Thread Justin Hallett
if it's still around once I'm done with the cvs and mirror patches I'm working on I'll have a look at it. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Now only somebody has to do it :-) -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -=[JFH] Blue Falls Manufacturing Ltd. -=[JFH] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: [Fink-devel] Regression caused by indexing changes

2003-01-27 Thread Justin Hallett
try fink list --help [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >What's "fink list -o"? It's not documented. -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -=[JFH] Blue Falls Manufacturing Ltd. -=[JFH] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Ent

Re: [Fink-devel] FinkCommander

2003-01-26 Thread Justin Hallett
I'm all for it! [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Does anyone object to including FinkCommander on the next Fink .dmg? It >is pretty mature these days. > >I am thinking it would be separate from the .pkg, perhaps in a >"FinkCommander" folder with its own readme files and such. -=[JFH] Justin F. Halle

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [Fink-devel]Adding GPL2 or GPLv2 to the list of allowed l

2003-01-22 Thread Justin Hallett
I agree GPLv1 or v2 is still GPL. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Our use of the "BSD" license category is already pretty loose -- we lump >a lot of more-or-less similar licenses together there. I personally don't >see a need for any more precision in the GPL license category. -=[JFH] Justin F. Hall

Re: [Fink-devel] GNU getopt: use Fink's or package's own?

2003-01-20 Thread Justin Hallett
or you can add -I/sw/share/gengetopt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >For now I just BuildDepends on gengetopt and then copy >/sw/share/gengetopt/* into the source dir during the PatchScript to >replace the very old version of getopt included with the source. -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -=[JFH] Rend

Re: [Fink-devel] New revision of 3.23.54a

2003-01-15 Thread Justin Hallett
I have a sandbox yes but i leave my fink install like a users so i know it all works well :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Dont you use ssh to checkout? (most developers do) -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -=[JFH] Rendek Communications Inc. -=[JFH] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Fink-devel] New revision of 3.23.54a

2003-01-15 Thread Justin Hallett
I'll test it as soon as anon cvs works again :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Revision 2 is in unstable since yesterday. Would be great to get some >feedback on this one since I would like to move it to stable as soon >as possible. -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -=[JFH] Rendek Communications Inc. -=

Re: [Fink-devel] domain, need reply from key team at very least

2003-01-13 Thread Justin Hallett
I personally don't like it, ppl won't remember it, and if that is the case there is no point to move from fink.sf.net, but that is my opinion. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >What did you think of using a host within fink.org? Probably >web.fink.org (Mail.app recognizes web.* as http: by default) a

Re: [Fink-devel] New revision of 3.23.54a

2003-01-13 Thread Justin Hallett
This is an important fix, I helped him in IRC to fix this. it is needed for anyone upgrading mysql and should be added to cvs ASAP, the other fix I know nothing about. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Allow update for old mysql installation (thanks to Steve Kann) by >adding these two lines: >NoSetLDF

Re: [Fink-devel] Can I modify outside /sw?

2003-01-10 Thread Justin Hallett
tha tis it, looks very familiar :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Now, if we could just figure out why Apple didn't remove the inetd line >from /System/Library/IPServices/IPServices... -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -=[JFH] Rendek Communications Inc. -=[JFH] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Re: [Fink-devel] Can I modify outside /sw?

2003-01-10 Thread Justin Hallett
as max noted I'm working on adding xinetd support to daemonic. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >I'm curious, perhaps Fink could standardize a location in the /sw/etc >directory, perhaps /sw/etc/xinetd.d and then just add a line to >/etc/xinetd.conf that says IncludeDir /sw/etc/xinetd.d? This would >a

Re: [Fink-devel] Can I modify outside /sw?

2003-01-10 Thread Justin Hallett
or create a startup item for xinetd, it seems to me I remember having to do this to test proftpd with xinetd. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >What do you mean by "startup items are more preferred"? Should I >somehow create a startup item for hotway instead of using xinetd and if >so, how would I do t

Re: [Fink-devel] domain, need reply from key team at very least

2003-01-10 Thread Justin Hallett
I suggested hq because I found xinehq.de and mplayerhq.de, so I thought it was a de thing :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >finkhq seems to be something very US centric. I guess HQ stands for >"head quarter" ? In any case, not many people from here would >associate it with that immediatly. And it wo

Re: [Fink-devel] domain, need reply from key team at very least

2003-01-10 Thread Justin Hallett
I think everyone will vote for fink.info but it's NOT avail not sure about fink.net but fink.org is avail ATM and this is discussion is for all, I just wanted to get the core teams attention at least :P [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >I agree with David that I don't like the 'hq'. To me it doesn't me

Re: [Fink-devel] domain, need reply from key team at very least

2003-01-10 Thread Justin Hallett
if this is the case then fink.org is the logical choice [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >I know one should never shed critique without offering a better > >solution. I have no better solution but I know that I will go and > >register > > > >finkdocu.org > >finkdevel.org -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -

Re: [Fink-devel] domain, need reply from key team at very least

2003-01-10 Thread Justin Hallett
I agree fink.info would rule but it's taken so we need an other, what about finkhq.info? [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >I did offer that as well. I am also still talking to the fink.info > >owner and they do not seem too reluctant on sponsoring the domain. > >Neither money nor resources seem to be th

[Fink-devel] domain, need reply from key team at very least

2003-01-10 Thread Justin Hallett
what about finkhq both de and com are avail... finkhq.de was my first though since both Chris and Max are from de it seems only right to honor them and there country. or finkhq.com it we want to be in the .com I think .org is avail to, I talked to rand on irc and he is willing to host it and I'm

Re: [Fink-devel] FAW Q1.5: Then why did you choose /sw? -- How about /usr/loca

2003-01-09 Thread Justin Hallett
wow fink is a *nix dist now...cool [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >being a standard directory in any distribution of *nix I've ever -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -=[JFH] Rendek Communications Inc. -=[JFH] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.NET email i

Re: [Fink-devel] FAW Q1.5: Then why did you choose /sw? -- How about /usr/loca

2003-01-09 Thread Justin Hallett
excellent for the first time in those 2 years someone that did there hoework. this is my 2 cents. first as for /usr/local and /opt install it there, fink allows that. but after you install into say ./usr/local, do a fink install sdl then install OSXMplayercrap that just broke fink and you do

Re: [Fink-devel] FAW Q1.5: Then why did you choose /sw? -- How about /usr/local/f

2003-01-09 Thread Justin Hallett
I have a better question since I've been reading this question for over 2 years now... Wlat, Why /usr/local/fink and not /sw? [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > From the FAQ: > >Q1.5: Then why did you choose /sw? > >A: That choice is quite arbitrary. If you have a better suggestion, post >it >to the fi

Re: [Fink-devel] compile problems with Apple's X11 installed.

2003-01-08 Thread Justin Hallett
add -lX11 to the link line [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >plus I don't know how to fix that "illegal reference" error -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -=[JFH] Rendek Communications Inc. -=[JFH] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by

Re: [Fink-devel] Apple X11 - easy...

2003-01-08 Thread Justin Hallett
to fix this source init.sh in your /etc/x11/init/xinitrc or your ~/.xinitrc which ever your setup to use [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >In order to get the apple X to find the packages, using the customise >option >of the X11 Edit menu, I had to give full paths such as /sw/bin/gimp (not >sure >why) an

Re: [Fink-devel] I've gone RSS CRAZY!

2003-01-05 Thread Justin Hallett
man that would be great for temptress too a new? command, or new unstable? and new stable? default would be stable of course :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >I've now got a script that generates an RSS feed that gives you the new >packages in the last 7 days, in both stable and unstable. -=[JFH] J

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink RSS news feed

2003-01-05 Thread Justin Hallett
with a little of your help we could prolly get temptress to pick this up? [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >I've put together an experimental stylesheet for generating a fink RSS >news feed, so that whenever news shows up on the main site, it'll also >be available there. It looks OK, but I'd like some

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: fink package manager release

2003-01-05 Thread Justin Hallett
the thing is, that on any pkg it breaks it's easy enough to fix using noset and then setting it to the old way. But i still think it needs testing before a big change like that. Though I would like to get the first phase of my cvs parser/auto repair into cvs, so I can make a new patch for selfudp

[Fink-devel] Re: fwd

2003-01-01 Thread Justin Hallett
drm had to forward this to me it seems like I'm not receiving all my emails, but this is great feedback thanks, and I think they are all good, I didn't have the last issue though and the vars are reset, but I'll look into it. I'm about the commit all the other changes though, I was thinking of ad

Re: [Fink-devel] selfupdate-cvs; small patch

2002-12-31 Thread Justin Hallett
how does this look, it also can fix conflicts (cvs errors)...comments welcome here. I'll past three examples of it, first one uses -q and has warnings, second uses -y and has warnings and the three is normal with no warning it won't ask about the dump. justin@Novaley [/sw/fink/10.2/unstable/main/

Re: [Fink-devel] selfupdate-cvs; small patch

2002-12-28 Thread Justin Hallett
I disagree 100% which this, as some users may not know how, and it'd be harder for us to help, when I make the patch using fink -q selfupdate-cvs will be the only way to quiet it, any other way will show the changes and will log the rest an on an error will be asked to save a cvs dump. [EMAIL PROT

Re: [Fink-devel] selfupdate-cvs; small patch

2002-12-28 Thread Justin Hallett
I will also see if I can come up with a good solution for this as well. on monday :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >On Saturday, Dec 28, 2002, at 12:52 US/Eastern, Martin Costabel wrote: >> Unfortunately, cvs does not have a cleanup option, "cvs update >> --delete" or something. For a clean solution,

Re: [Fink-devel] selfupdate-cvs; small patch

2002-12-28 Thread Justin Hallett
I agree with the verbose level, no need although adding it to -q would be easy enough though I still say the output needs to get processed. I'll work on that patch on monday. Can someone open a feature request for it and assign it to me "TheSin" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >I don't see the point o

[Fink-devel] Fwd: Re: [finkcommander-users] Re: FinkCommander and Fink 0.5.0a

2002-12-27 Thread Justin Hallett
if this is the case I think we should look into this? anyone else see this yet? Okay, I think I found the problem. After trying everything short of reinstalling from scratch (threw out preferences, removed packages, etc.) I ran "fink configure" and when it asked what alternate directory to look f

Re: [Fink-devel] selfupdate-cvs; small patch

2002-12-26 Thread Justin Hallett
I agree with this 100%, maybe it should go on the task list for the next release or at least a v1 release. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >A new execute() style function would have to be added to Services that >could do the execution, read each line, parse and output on the fly... >buffering everythi

Re: [Fink-devel] selfupdate-cvs; small patch

2002-12-26 Thread Justin Hallett
I think we could just process it with perl and output what we want, I have done so in my bin dist sricts that way we can add something for C lines like please fix this file, or something. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >This looks useful but perhaps it should be tied to the fink " >verbosity" setting

Re: [Fink-devel] Can someone add "fink validate" docs somewhere I can find them?

2002-12-24 Thread Justin Hallett
all the commands are in /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Engine.pm I wouldn't play in there but you can find the list at least. New docs are in the making ATM. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >should be more prominent on the web pages and maybe in "fink --help" -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -=[JFH] Rendek Communicat

Re: [Fink-devel] new CVS branch: isystem

2002-12-23 Thread Justin Hallett
yup and I sent positive feedback as soon as i tried it. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >For example, which packages still don't work? gd? You fixed it. -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -=[JFH] Rendek Communications Inc. -=[JFH] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: [Fink-devel] A request to all package porters..

2002-12-20 Thread Justin Hallett
as soon as the fink bug is fixed I'll be making one. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >We should also start talking about what is needed for fink to have an >unstable tree bindist. -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -=[JFH] Rendek Communications Inc. -=[JFH] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Fink-devel] bug in id3lib3.7

2002-12-10 Thread Justin Hallett
i agree it shoudl use fink's popt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >id3lib3.7-dev is installing popt.h, which is part of the popt package. >It should get deleted, or even better, id3lib should probably be made to >build against the popt fink package instead... -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -=[JFH] Rende

Re: [Fink-devel] -j[2..] in package builds

2002-12-06 Thread Justin Hallett
hmm funny when I asked for a dual Ti ppl look at me funny :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Every power mac sold (for the past 6 months) is dual processor. Its an >all-dual lineup. -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -=[JFH] Rendek Communications Inc. -=[JFH] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Re: [Fink-devel] testing needed

2002-12-06 Thread Justin Hallett
it'll take awhile for the sf mirrors to pick it up... [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >I wasn't able to download the fink-0.11.1-1 source. -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -=[JFH] Rendek Communications Inc. -=[JFH] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This sf.net em

Re: [Fink-devel] solving the -I/sw/include -I. problem

2002-12-03 Thread Justin Hallett
I have checked your version with CPPFLAGS off but this also shuts off extra support like dlcompat and such. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Given that it is not always possible to ignore CPPFlags, perhaps it >would be best if an oprtion to deinstall packages was available to >package maintainers. As

Re: [Fink-devel] FinkCommander feedback...

2002-11-25 Thread Justin Hallett
true enough, but if the finkcommander users email was the finkcommander mailing list. well then we'd just be assuming they are on the list which could very likely not be true. Well it's an idea i guess. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >That is a serious run on sentence, justin. :) > >Anyway that would

Re: [Fink-devel] FinkCommander feedback...

2002-11-25 Thread Justin Hallett
this is true but it has to be done somehow i believe it is a cookie on your system with that browser and since FC wouldn't necessarily use your browser for a POST request it'd need it's own as Max suggested. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >It is still true with the new 'remember' facility on SF ? >I've

Re: [Fink-devel] FinkCommander feedback...

2002-11-25 Thread Justin Hallett
or if we made a finkcommander user perhaps or made the sf user name/password in the configure options I think opening the bug tracker to the public isn't 100% bad but I think it's fine the way it is now and we'd need a way to check bugs first to make sure it's not already reported, but I think in t

Re: [Fink-devel] FinkCommander feedback...

2002-11-25 Thread Justin Hallett
is there any way to interact with the sf.net tracker and get FC to acctually submit the bug it's self? [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >As such, I wonder if it would be possible to change the Feedback >feature yet again a bit... maybe one could provide a "Report a bug" >command, which would open the l

Re: [Fink-devel] RFC - Is KDE OK to move into stable?

2002-11-17 Thread Justin Hallett
I have none, they have worked very well for me since 3.0.7 was in your exp, so I dem them as stable as the code allows them to be without sound :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Are there any objections? -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -=[JFH] Rendek Communications Inc. -=[JFH] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: [Fink-devel] problem with xine's mirror

2002-11-07 Thread Justin Hallett
should be fine now. Seems they finally move there files to sf policy, thanks. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: A >nd it really seems that the xine.sourceforge.net is down (i've been >trying for 2 days) -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -=[JFH] Rendek Communications Inc. -=[JFH] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Fink-devel] -isystem problems in current cvs with pstoedit

2002-11-04 Thread Justin Hallett
well I've encontered it once so far on a package not mentioned on the list, but that is it for me so far. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >haven't encountered a problem I couldn't resolve easily, and not a >single issue of the above mentioned GCC bug.

Re: [Fink-devel] -isystem problems in current cvs with pstoedit

2002-11-04 Thread Justin Hallett
so as a temp fix why don't we make use of GCC: 3.1 and if GCC: 3.1 then CPPFLAGS = -I/sw/include instead of -isystem?? [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Anyway, the workaround (disabling isystem) will quite likely be needed >for any C++ package. I am not saying i object to it.. isystem may >actually be

Re: [Fink-devel] -isystem problems in current cvs with pstoedit

2002-11-04 Thread Justin Hallett
ahhh perfect thanks Max, i guess we should doc this someplace for others. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >You can, and always could, do this: > >SetCPPFLAGS: -I%p/include >NoSetCPPFLAGS: true > >The NoSetCPPFLAGS has only one effect: don't add the default value for >CPPFLAGS > -

Re: [Fink-devel] -isystem problems in current cvs with pstoedit

2002-11-04 Thread Justin Hallett
OH I understand this, it's jsut I needed it for testing, and I thought I'd let you know since i didn't nothingn to the patch it's self just the info file to save you some time later if need be. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Fine, but there is really no need for that. First off, I will convert >the p

Re: [Fink-devel] -isystem problems in current cvs with pstoedit

2002-11-04 Thread Justin Hallett
two things, #1 i have a libxml2 pkg in my exp that conforms to the new env vars #2, is the best way for pkgs that the -isystem breaks it to do a NoSetCPPFLAGS then use a compilescript to set CPPFLAGS? could we not add a ResetCPPFLAGS?? that would not include defaults options only what I set? [EM

[Fink-devel] small suggestion

2002-11-04 Thread Justin Hallett
i know this isn't top of the list, but when rebuilding or building a splitoff pkg shoulding it say all the splits? Now: sudo /sw/bin/fink rebuild libxml2-shlibs Information about 1744 packages read in 8 seconds. The following package will be rebuilt: libxml2-shlibs After: sudo /sw/bin/fink re

[Fink-devel] Re: Fink audiofile package

2002-11-04 Thread Justin Hallett
well i haven't looked at the output just yet, i will when i get a chance but I'm telling you now your script isn't doing something cause I just tested the files for audiofile in cvs and they are fine. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Actually, I have a script that runs fink selfupdate-cvs and fink >upda

[Fink-devel] Re: Fink audiofile package

2002-11-04 Thread Justin Hallett
I need your OSX version and the output of fink --version please, though i know what the problem is I just need to know where to fix it. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >I have been having a lot of problems lately with installing the audiofile >package. It appears the sources are out of date. I am runnin

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Conversion from character set 'UTF-8' to 'en_US' is not supp

2002-10-29 Thread Justin Hallett
perfect that seems to have fix it, I'll put a version depends on it..thanks msek. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Please try glib2-2.0.6-3. I compiled gkrellm2 and it works for me with >new glib2. -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -=[JFH] Rendek Communications Inc. -=[JFH] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

[Fink-devel] Re: Conversion from character set 'UTF-8' to 'en_US' is not supported (gkrellm

2002-10-25 Thread Justin Hallett
nope justin@Novaley [~/Devel/proftpd]$ export LC_COLLATE=C justin@Novaley [~/Devel/proftpd]$ export LC_TIME=C justin@Novaley [~/Devel/proftpd]$ /sw/lib/gproftpd/gproftpd GLib: Cannot convert message: Conversion from character set 'UTF-8' to 'en_US' is not supported ** (gproftpd:26660): WARNING *

[Fink-devel] Re: Conversion from character set 'UTF-8' to 'en_US' is not supported (gkrellm2)

2002-10-24 Thread Justin Hallett
hmm did you see what I had to do to fix it though?? [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Interesting, another fink developer had this exact problem just today. >Not gkrellm specific. His fix was to unset the env var LANG first. You >probably have LANG as "en_US" in your environment. I think it is a bug >

Re: [Fink-devel] The Illuminati Order

2002-10-24 Thread Justin Hallett
I like the "but she" part :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> but she wishes to remain ananymous. > >That's funny, I don't know anyone named "ananymous"... -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -=[JFH] Rendek Communications Inc. -=[JFH] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: [Fink-devel] CPATH / LIBRARY_PATH

2002-10-24 Thread Justin Hallett
I've gone through the code and this is true, it also execs everything in profile.d before the build. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >I was under the impression that even in the clean build environment >init/sh got executed: I do have -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -=[JFH] Rendek Communications Inc. -=[

Re: [Fink-devel] CPATH / LIBRARY_PATH

2002-10-24 Thread Justin Hallett
I'm working on clanlib, big problems there still, will be a whlile yet and the new pilot-link as well. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >and clanlib still missing), for gettext11. -=[JFH] Justin F. Hallett -=[JFH] Rendek Communications Inc. -=[JFH] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: [Fink-devel] RuntimeDepends

2002-10-10 Thread Justin Hallett
no, fink would just translate it in the control file for the deb building phase, and apt and friends don't even know about the .info files only the debs and there control files. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >I like this idea better, because doesn't apt and friends use depends >for runtime stuff? if

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Dependency/provides question

2002-10-09 Thread Justin Hallett
there would be a set of work to do on the manager it's self, which would be tricky but not soo bad, then there would be maintainer cooperation, which I wouldn't be part of, i have no interest in maintining and testing every single variant of everyone of my pkgs. We are a small team of maintainers

Re: [Fink-devel] system-ncurses ? hmmm

2002-10-07 Thread Justin Hallett
I'm not sure that any fink pkg does use them ATM, my system has over 600 pkgs built and most of them I run all the time, and I have both system ncurses and system-openssl, since the beginning of my install. I have a few other system pkgs as well see http://www.southofheaven.net/jaglist.htm to see

Re: [Fink-devel] glad it's not my update to Engine.pm

2002-07-25 Thread Justin Hallett
still the same if ((not defined $width and not $dotab) or (defined $width and (($width eq "") or ($width eq "auto") or ($width eq "=auto") or ($width eq "=" { $width = &get_term_width(); if (not defined $width or $width == 0) { $dotab = 1; # not a terminal, fallb

[Fink-devel] glad it's not my update to Engine.pm

2002-07-24 Thread Justin Hallett
lastest cvs + jag 327 if ((not defined $width and not $dotab) or (defined $width and 328(($width eq "") or ($width eq "auto") or ($width eq "=auto") or ($width eq "=" { 329$width = &get_term_width(); 330if ($width == 0) { 331 $dotab = 1; # not a terminal, fallback t

[Fink-devel] fink-libcheck v0.1.0

2002-07-23 Thread Justin Hallett
Hi with RangerRick's help I've expanded on the fix-fink utility and was wonder if I could get opinions and comments as well as knowing if anyone thinks this would be a useful util and should be added as a fink package? Please try it and let the list know what you think of it and if you have any p

Re: [Fink-devel] .la files

2002-07-16 Thread Justin Hallett
not in this case...it works for every link execpt when it links lib A to B since this pkg has too libs. If I don't like A to B it's fine as well. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Usually, this can be avoided by, > >NoSetLDFLAGS: true >SetLIBS: -L%p/lib ¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·., Just

[Fink-devel] .la files

2002-07-15 Thread Justin Hallett
I got a little question...in a Makefile I have foo_LDADD: $(srcdir)/foo/bar.la then in the link line I have $(LINK) -rpath $(libdir) $(OBJECTS) $(foo_LDADD) this does a c++ -dynamiclib -flat_namespace -undefined suppress -o .libs/foo.0.0.0.dylib blah.lo -L/sw/lib -L../foo/.libs -lbar -lc -

Re: [Fink-devel] getopt_long in 10.2

2002-07-10 Thread Justin Hallett
I think it's only in unstable so ther eis no bin dist of it. Check finks FAQ on the web for using the unstable pkgs. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Is this part of fink? apt-get can't seem to find it. ¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·., Justin F. Hallett - Systems Analyst

Re: [Fink-devel] getopt_long in 10.2

2002-07-10 Thread Justin Hallett
install gengetopt. It's GNU getopt with the getopt long function but it's just the c files and the header not a lib to link..but it's there and works I use it for many pkgs. Like lftp and i think a few others. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Could someone with a working MacOSX 10.2 tell me if there

Re: [Fink-devel] kde: -ssl obligatory?

2002-07-05 Thread Justin Hallett
totally agree to have mozilla you need crypto and to have kdebindings you need mozilla...easy circle in my head. It's not the the chicken and the egg. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >It seems to me that if package foo Depends on package bar, and package >bar is >in crypto, then package foo has to be

Re: [Fink-devel] How do I report failed packages?

2002-06-27 Thread Justin Hallett
here or even better would be to fire off and email to the maintainer "fink info " for the maintainers email. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >I am currently updating my fink tree using the CVS option. There are a >couple of obsolete links, newer versions etc of the packages, wich makes >the installat

Re: [Fink-devel] "experimental" cvs tree?

2002-06-25 Thread Justin Hallett
Ben, I doubt anyone will object, think of how useful it's been to us, I'm sure every developer here would love to have the safe convenience. So of course count me in :P [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >The "experimental" CVS module sounds good to me too. ¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·., J

Re: [Fink-devel] cleaner Fink environment?

2002-06-21 Thread Justin Hallett
I agree so long as this is possible [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >no, I do not think that is a good idea. What if some user already has the >name fink taken? We cannot guarantee that. I think we should not have a >dedicated user, but everything should be done by cleaning root's env and >then using p

Re: [Fink-devel] cleaner Fink environment?

2002-06-21 Thread Justin Hallett
not if you lock the fink home dir or make /tmp that gets wiped all the time. It doesn't need a valid home since it's not a real user... [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >And if the user somehow changed the .cshrc file at a later date? >We're then back to where we started. ¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][J

Re: [Fink-devel] cleaner Fink environment?

2002-06-21 Thread Justin Hallett
what if there was a user named fink? with a clean env? [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >The problem with "su -l" is that su invokes a shell. For example, on my >box $SHELL = tcsh, so "su -l" resets the environment and then launches >tcsh--which promptly reads my .cshrc and sets all kinds of env variab

Re: [Fink-devel] cleaner Fink environment?

2002-06-20 Thread Justin Hallett
well my first thought is if fink could spawn a shell session with out any env, and source and set what it needs to compile, I'm not sure what this will break or how ealily this could be done. But ti's a starting point. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Yes yes, I do fully agree it would be a nice thing

Re: [Fink-devel] kdemultimedia, aRTS etc...

2002-06-18 Thread Justin Hallett
IIRC kdemultimedia isn't even ported yet, as a matter a fact I've been working on it, and it's not likely going to be ported till 10.2 as it need sem.h in many places. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >I believe it's part of kdemultimedia, and if I recall correctly, for it >to be enabled, you need to ha

Re: [Fink-devel] fink 0.9.13 schedule

2002-06-09 Thread Justin Hallett
Dave, it's in the patch tracker ATM, it was based on a discussion on the channel like a few weeks ago. I believe I submitted lftp with the new changelog field. for testing. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Justin, I've never heard of this. What are you talking about? ¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][

Re: [Fink-devel] fink 0.9.13 schedule

2002-06-09 Thread Justin Hallett
I thought the reason of adding assist in development for developers was kinda understood. There is no real impact for the end user, except maybe curiosity, but I know i use it all the time and it would be nice if i didn't have to keep adding it to fink after every inject.pl I run. And I'd like t

  1   2   3   >