On 27 Apr 2008, at 20:30, Koen van der Drift wrote:
>
> On Apr 26, 2008, at 2:21 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
>
>> This must have come from some other lib*.la that isn't quite up to
>> date.
>> You can check with
>>
>> grep /sw/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.la -l /sw/lib/lib*la | xargs dpkg -S
>>
>> which
On Apr 26, 2008, at 2:21 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> This must have come from some other lib*.la that isn't quite up to
> date.
> You can check with
>
> grep /sw/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.la -l /sw/lib/lib*la | xargs dpkg -S
>
> which package is responsible and needs to be rebuilt (hoping that thi
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 12:37:57AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Daniel Macks wrote:
> []
> >> Keeping a pre-pangocairo/stable tree alongside a pangocairo/unstable
> >> tree will not work, either. How could we then move packages from
> >> unstable to stable?
> >
> > Mixing stable and unstable
Daniel Macks wrote:
[]
>> Keeping a pre-pangocairo/stable tree alongside a pangocairo/unstable
>> tree will not work, either. How could we then move packages from
>> unstable to stable?
>
> Mixing stable and unstable (i.e., using older "stable" packages once
> one has started using "unstable", o
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:16:25PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
> Martin Costabel wrote:
> []
> >cd /sw/fink/10.4
> >mv stable /dev/null
> >mv unstable stable
> >mv pangocairo-branch/unstable unstable
> >
> > I know it's a dream,
>
> After looking for a while at the state of pan
On Apr 26, 2008, at 3:03 PM, Kevin Horton wrote:
> On 26 Apr 2008, at 14:51, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>
>> On Apr 26, 2008, at 1:11 PM, Kevin Horton wrote:
>>
>>> We need to move packages much more quickly from the unstable to
>>> stable
>>> trees. The concept of waiting for adequate positive fee
Martin Costabel wrote:
[]
>cd /sw/fink/10.4
>mv stable /dev/null
>mv unstable stable
>mv pangocairo-branch/unstable unstable
>
> I know it's a dream,
After looking for a while at the state of pangocairo-branch/stable, I am
now convinced that what I proposed is not a dream, it is
Am 26.04.2008 um 20:21 schrieb Martin Costabel:
> Pierre-Henri Lavigne wrote:
>> Yhellow,
>>
>> I got the same problem while compiling gnash, in the case with
>> freetype
>> 219 enabled. I told yesterday in IRC I got an error while compiling
>> gimp2 with the new pango-cairo testing branches. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Costabel wrote:
| In both trees, the guile18-gtk package has the same version, 2.0-6.
| The result is that when doing the update-all to the pc-branch, this
| package is not rebuilt and continues to spread the wrong linking
| information.
|
| Sh
On 26 Apr 2008, at 14:51, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On Apr 26, 2008, at 1:11 PM, Kevin Horton wrote:
>
>> We need to move packages much more quickly from the unstable to
>> stable
>> trees. The concept of waiting for adequate positive feedback does
>> not
>> work, IMHO, as people who are happ
On Apr 26, 2008, at 1:11 PM, Kevin Horton wrote:
>
> We need to move packages much more quickly from the unstable to stable
> trees. The concept of waiting for adequate positive feedback does not
> work, IMHO, as people who are happy with something usually keep
> quiet. If there is a major prob
Martin Costabel wrote:
> Pierre-Henri Lavigne wrote:
>> Yhellow,
>>
>> I got the same problem while compiling gnash, in the case with freetype
>> 219 enabled. I told yesterday in IRC I got an error while compiling
>> gimp2 with the new pango-cairo testing branches. Idem looking for a
>> missing /sw
Pierre-Henri Lavigne wrote:
> Yhellow,
>
> I got the same problem while compiling gnash, in the case with freetype
> 219 enabled. I told yesterday in IRC I got an error while compiling
> gimp2 with the new pango-cairo testing branches. Idem looking for a
> missing /sw/lib/libpango-1.0.la
This mus
Yhellow,
I got the same problem while compiling gnash, in the case with freetype
219 enabled. I told yesterday in IRC I got an error while compiling
gimp2 with the new pango-cairo testing branches. Idem looking for a
missing /sw/lib/libpango-1.0.la
I don't know how to solve that. I switched back
Am 25.04.2008 um 17:25 schrieb Benjamin Reed:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Max Horn wrote:
>
> |fink scanpackages
> |sudo apt-get update
> |sudo apt-get install pango1-xft2-ft219-dev=1.18.4-2 pango1-xft2-
> | ft219=1.18.4-2
> | pango1-xft2-ft219-shlibs=1.18.4-
On 26-Apr-08, at 12:11 , Martin Costabel wrote:
> What I am dreaming of is that somone would have the courage to step up
> to the cvs server and do the equivalent of
>
> cd /sw/fink/10.4
> mv stable /dev/null
> mv unstable stable
> mv pangocairo-branch/unstable unstable
++
We need to mov
Daniel Macks wrote:
> Fink will be deploying the long-awaited gnome upgrade, often called
> "pangocairo" soon.
Please don't wait too long. Seriously maintaining 4 versions
10.4/{stable,unstable} and 10.4-pangocairo/{stable,unstable} in addition
to the 10.4/10.5 and ppc/intel alternatives is imp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Macks wrote:
| do you really mean to declare that pango1-xft2 and pango1-xft2-ft219
| are binary-compatible now? We should have just done this for pc months
| ago instead of all the pathname nonsense to find the "hidden" files
| for pango1-xft2
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 11:25:51AM -0400, Benjamin Reed wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Max Horn wrote:
>
> |fink scanpackages
> |sudo apt-get update
> |sudo apt-get install pango1-xft2-ft219-dev=1.18.4-2 pango1-xft2-
> | ft219=1.18.4-2
> | pango1-xft2-ft2
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:20:52PM +0200, Max Horn wrote:
>
> Am 24.04.2008 um 20:43 schrieb Daniel Macks:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 08:29:44PM +0200, Max Horn wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> so GTK+2 is fixed, but for me it fails downloading
> >> libdatrie_0.1.2.orig.tar.gz -- anybody ready to fi
On 25/04/2008, Koen van der Drift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Apr 24, 2008, at 12:20 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
>
> > Fink will be deploying the long-awaited gnome upgrade, often called
> > "pangocairo" soon. One or more of your packages has been changed as
> > part of this project, and we'd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Max Horn wrote:
|fink scanpackages
|sudo apt-get update
|sudo apt-get install pango1-xft2-ft219-dev=1.18.4-2 pango1-xft2-
| ft219=1.18.4-2
| pango1-xft2-ft219-shlibs=1.18.4-2
|
| Failed: Fink::SysState: Could not resolve inconsistent depen
Am 25.04.2008 um 00:12 schrieb Koen van der Drift:
>
> On Apr 24, 2008, at 12:20 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
>
>> Fink will be deploying the long-awaited gnome upgrade, often called
>> "pangocairo" soon. One or more of your packages has been changed as
>> part of this project, and we'd welcome your h
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 06:12:33PM -0400, Koen van der Drift wrote:
>
> On Apr 24, 2008, at 12:20 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
>
> > Fink will be deploying the long-awaited gnome upgrade, often called
> > "pangocairo" soon. One or more of your packages has been changed as
> > part of this project, and
On Apr 24, 2008, at 12:20 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
> Fink will be deploying the long-awaited gnome upgrade, often called
> "pangocairo" soon. One or more of your packages has been changed as
> part of this project, and we'd welcome your help testing these
> changes.
Maybe a silly question, but ho
Am 24.04.2008 um 20:43 schrieb Daniel Macks:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 08:29:44PM +0200, Max Horn wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> so GTK+2 is fixed, but for me it fails downloading
>> libdatrie_0.1.2.orig.tar.gz -- anybody ready to fix that? :-)
>
> libdatrie is same as in main distro, so fink's master-mirr
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 08:29:44PM +0200, Max Horn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> so GTK+2 is fixed, but for me it fails downloading
> libdatrie_0.1.2.orig.tar.gz -- anybody ready to fix that? :-)
libdatrie is same as in main distro, so fink's master-mirror pool
should have its source.
dan
--
Daniel Mack
Hi,
so GTK+2 is fixed, but for me it fails downloading
libdatrie_0.1.2.orig.tar.gz -- anybody ready to fix that? :-)
Cheers,
Max
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's
Benjamin Reed wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
> | problem #1:
> |
> | fink can't download "gtk\+2.0_2.12.8-1.diff.gz" file. all mirrors
> | return error-404
>
> We'll just need to update it to a newer version of debian's patch.
> Gimme a few m
Michal Suchanek wrote:
> On 24/04/2008, Daniel Macks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Fink will be deploying the long-awaited gnome upgrade, often called
>> "pangocairo" soon. One or more of your packages has been changed as
>> part of this project, and we'd welcome your help testing these
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
| problem #1:
|
| fink can't download "gtk\+2.0_2.12.8-1.diff.gz" file. all mirrors
| return error-404
We'll just need to update it to a newer version of debian's patch.
Gimme a few minutes and I'll fix. =)
- --
Benjamin Re
On 24/04/2008, Daniel Macks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fink will be deploying the long-awaited gnome upgrade, often called
> "pangocairo" soon. One or more of your packages has been changed as
> part of this project, and we'd welcome your help testing these
> changes. At a minimum, you will ne
Daniel Macks wrote:
> Fink will be deploying the long-awaited gnome upgrade, often called
> "pangocairo" soon.
Which mirror carries gtk+2.0_2.12.8-1.diff.gz? Can't find it anywhere.
--
Martin
-
This SF.net email is sponso
problem #1:
fink can't download "gtk\+2.0_2.12.8-1.diff.gz" file. all mirrors
return error-404
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Daniel Macks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fink will be deploying the long-awaited gnome upgrade, often called
> "pangocairo" soon. One or more of your packages has been
Hurray!
updating to pangocairo-branch now :)
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Daniel Macks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fink will be deploying the long-awaited gnome upgrade, often called
> "pangocairo" soon. One or more of your packages has been changed as
> part of this project, and we'd welc
Fink will be deploying the long-awaited gnome upgrade, often called
"pangocairo" soon. One or more of your packages has been changed as
part of this project, and we'd welcome your help testing these
changes. At a minimum, you will need to be aware of them, because
these changes will need to be reta
36 matches
Mail list logo
