-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/23/11 11:31 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
> On 9/23/2011 10:56 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 9/16/11 2:35 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
>>> On 15/09/11 16:13, David R. Morrison wrote: []
On 9/23/2011 10:56 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 9/16/11 2:35 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
>> On 15/09/11 16:13, David R. Morrison wrote: []
>>> But there are also lots of unmaintained things in unstable, many
>>> of them very old, so I think it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/16/11 2:35 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
> On 15/09/11 16:13, David R. Morrison wrote: []
>> But there are also lots of unmaintained things in unstable, many
>> of them very old, so I think it would be dangerous to just dump
>> everything to stable.
On 15/09/11 16:13, David R. Morrison wrote:
[]
> But there are also lots of unmaintained things in unstable, many of them very
> old, so I think it would be dangerous to just dump everything to stable. I
> like Alexander's approach.
Why would this be more dangerous than the current situation, w
On Sep 15, 2011, at 7:05 AM, Sébastien Maret wrote:
>
> Le 15 sept. 2011 à 15:51, Alexander Hansen a écrit :
>
>> We probably don't want just to dump packages into stable without doing a
>> little testing to make sure they all actually work. ;-) One option would
>> be something like the followi
Le 15 sept. 2011 à 15:51, Alexander Hansen a écrit :
> We probably don't want just to dump packages into stable without doing a
> little testing to make sure they all actually work. ;-) One option would
> be something like the following:
Is this really needed? In my experience, the unstable bra
On 9/15/11 8:32 AM, Sébastien Maret wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could gcc46 be moved to 10.5/stable and 10.6/stable ? One of my package
> depends on that version of the compiler, so I can't move it to stable.
>
> A more general question: now that we've only have a stable branch in 10.7,
> wouldn't it m
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 02:32:52PM +0200, Sébastien Maret wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could gcc46 be moved to 10.5/stable and 10.6/stable ? One of my package
> depends on that version of the compiler, so I can't move it to stable.
>
> A more general question: now that we've only have a stable branch in
Hello,
Could gcc46 be moved to 10.5/stable and 10.6/stable ? One of my package depends
on that version of the compiler, so I can't move it to stable.
A more general question: now that we've only have a stable branch in 10.7,
wouldn't it make sense to drop the unstable branches in 10.5 and 10.6
