Re: [Fink-devel] Re: A suggestion

2004-07-02 Thread Daniel Macks
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 12:55:27PM -0500, Corey Halpin wrote: > Daniel E. Macks wrote: > >Someone on -devel or #fink (perhaps jfm?) has a giant shell pipeline > >version of this (and that covers a lot of weird corner cases), that I > >encapsulated as fink-dep-check in my experimental dir. > > Co

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: A suggestion

2004-07-02 Thread Alexander Strange
On Jul 2, 2004, at 1:55 PM, Corey Halpin wrote: Cool. It didn't occur to me to look for (and through) people's experimental directories. If I were looking for your experimental dir, would I be able to find it in cvs somewhere? Or does it just live in your sandbox on your machine? thank yo

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: A suggestion

2004-07-02 Thread Corey Halpin
Daniel E. Macks wrote: Corey Halpin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: In working with my packages, I've written a little script that uses otool -L and dpkg -S to figure out what my package needs to depend on. Good idea. This approach gives packages that need not be specified explicitly (if they are dep

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: A suggestion

2004-07-02 Thread TheSin
also all of this is in my shlibs branch, but it checks against a shlibs db, which virtual packages would have in the fink pkg. So it'd be a complete list with minimum versions. --- TS http://southofheaven.org Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 2-Jul-04, at 12:37 AM, D

[Fink-devel] Re: A suggestion

2004-07-01 Thread Daniel E. Macks
Corey Halpin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >In working with my packages, I've written a little script that uses > otool -L and dpkg -S to figure out what my package needs to depend on. Good idea. This approach gives packages that need not be specified explicitly (if they are dependencies of de