Following the David and Martin's suggestions I've tried to fix the
problem related to system-tetex that I've reported a couple of weeks
ago (tempus fugit!!! ;-), but
I'm still trying to get a consistent package for PyX without success.
I'll describe the entire situation hoping someone can help m
Andrea Riciputi wrote:
Sorry but I don't understand. As far as I can understand I need this
alternative in the case the user has tetex installed via Fink and not
via Gerben's i-Installer.
Am I wrong?
IMHO yes. Since system-tetex "Provides" tetex-base, you don't need to
mention it there. The dep
If your link line has "-lkpathsea", then a user who has tetex-dev installed
will get a link to libkpathsea.dylib, whereas a user with system-tetex
installed will get a link to libkpathsea.a . (The darwin linker prefers
the shared version whenever it can find it.)
-- Dave
-
Sorry but I don't understand. As far as I can understand I need this
alternative in the case the user has tetex installed via Fink and not
via Gerben's i-Installer.
Am I wrong?
Andrea.
On 23 Feb 2004, at 14:35, Martin Costabel wrote:
Package: pyx-py23
Version: 0.5.1
Revision: 1
Depends: pyth
David R. Morrison wrote:
Martin,
It is not an omission that system-tetex does not provide tetex-dev.
One of the differences between Gerben Wierda's teTeX distribution and the
fink one is that in fink, we build libkpathsea as a shared library, whereas
it is only a static library in Wierda's distri
Uhm... I'm getting a little bit confused here. Linking the kpathsea
library is exactly what I do with PyX, I don't have tetex-dev installed
(only system-tetex) and I've not seen any problem during compiling and
installing process. Could you explain this a little further?
Thanks,
Andrea.
Martin,
It is not an omission that system-tetex does not provide tetex-dev.
One of the differences between Gerben Wierda's teTeX distribution and the
fink one is that in fink, we build libkpathsea as a shared library, whereas
it is only a static library in Wierda's distribution.
(This may change
Andrea Riciputi wrote:
[]
Package: pyx-py23
Version: 0.5.1
Revision: 1
Depends: python23|python23-nox, tetex-base | system-tetex, ghostscript
system-tetex already "Provides" tetex-base, so you don't need this
alternative. I suspect this is where the problem comes from.
| ghostscript-nox | system
Hi,
I've a problem with system-tetex. I'm the maintainer of pyx-py*
packages and it happens quite often to reinstall this packages (to
update them). Every time I try to do it I get the following error
message:
/usr/bin/sudo /sw/bin/fink install pyx-py23
Information about 2804 packages read in