Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

On 2011-01-16, at 04:59 , Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > Unfortunately I found that texlive-base (<= 0.20080816-3) > conflicts with new texlive-texmf (>= 0.20100722-0), and > for this reason "fink update-all" doesn't work. > > One way to update from the previous (2008) version is: > > $ fink build tex

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

At Sun, 16 Jan 2011 11:35:36 -0500, Kevin Horton wrote: > > On 2011-01-16, at 04:59 , Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > > > Unfortunately I found that texlive-base (<= 0.20080816-3) > > conflicts with new texlive-texmf (>= 0.20100722-0), and > > for this reason "fink update-all" doesn't work. > > > > One

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

On 2011-01-16, at 04:59 , Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > Unfortunately I found that texlive-base (<= 0.20080816-3) > conflicts with new texlive-texmf (>= 0.20100722-0), and > for this reason "fink update-all" doesn't work. > > One way to update from the previous (2008) version is: > > $ fink build tex

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

Unfortunately I found that texlive-base (<= 0.20080816-3) conflicts with new texlive-texmf (>= 0.20100722-0), and for this reason "fink update-all" doesn't work. One way to update from the previous (2008) version is: $ fink build texlive-texmf $ fink build texlive $ sudo apt-get install texlive-t

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

On 15/01/11 08:47 , Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > At Fri, 14 Jan 2011 23:48:36 +0100, > Martin Costabel wrote: [] >> So this is *again* a problem with fmtutil.cnf. Unfortunately, fmtutil >> does not say which file it is using. [] >> I do not understand why one needs several copies of fmtutil.cnf at all.

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

At Fri, 14 Jan 2011 23:48:36 +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: > > On 14/01/11 09:32 , Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > > I imported a patch from MacPorts, which disables Carbon API. > > https://trac.macports.org/ticket/25316 > > > > How does it work for you? > > Indeed, with this, texlive rev. test10 builds

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

On 14/01/11 09:32 , Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > I imported a patch from MacPorts, which disables Carbon API. > https://trac.macports.org/ticket/25316 > > How does it work for you? Indeed, with this, texlive rev. test10 builds OK for me on 10.6.6. The installation, however, did not succeed immediatel

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

I imported a patch from MacPorts, which disables Carbon API. https://trac.macports.org/ticket/25316 How does it work for you? Tomoaki Okayama At Fri, 14 Jan 2011 02:27:20 +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: > > On 11/01/11 20:26 , Martin Costabel wrote: > [] > > I'll go now back to 10.6/64bit and try

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

On 11/01/11 20:26 , Martin Costabel wrote: [] > I'll go now back to 10.6/64bit and try to see how to compile xetex. It > would be a pity if all texlive binaries would have to be compiled in > 32bit mode just because the xetex developers haven't yet got their act > together. The problem is actually

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

On 12/01/11 06:52, Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > At Tue, 11 Jan 2011 20:26:59 +0100, > Martin Costabel wrote: >> >> On 11/01/11 19:50 , Tomoaki Okayama wrote: >> [] >>> FYI, I always succeed to build texlive with ccache-default... >> >> Yes, this is weird. I haven't really made a test series to see whet

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

At Tue, 11 Jan 2011 20:26:59 +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: > > On 11/01/11 19:50 , Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > [] > > FYI, I always succeed to build texlive with ccache-default... > > Yes, this is weird. I haven't really made a test series to see whether > it *always* fails with ccache-default inst

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

At Tue, 11 Jan 2011 20:26:59 +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: > > On 11/01/11 19:50 , Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > > [For Install] > > Does the following command improve the situation? > > $ mv /Users/costabel/.texmf-var /Users/costabel/.texmf-var.old > > No, I had already tried this, it didn't help.

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

On 11/01/11 19:50 , Tomoaki Okayama wrote: [] > FYI, I always succeed to build texlive with ccache-default... Yes, this is weird. I haven't really made a test series to see whether it *always* fails with ccache-default installed. > [For Install] > Does the following command improve the situation

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

Thanks for your detailed report. [For Build] As you suggested, now 1. BuildConflicts: libicu36-dev, ccache-default, 2. Use libpng14, libpaper1. On the uploaded log, finkinfo was not the same as you obtained actually, and in my finkinfo libpng14 was used instead of libpng3. Sorry for the confusio

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:08:11 0100, Martin Costabel wrote: Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > > I've just tested texlive on 10.5/i386 and no error occurred. > > The log file is here (with -Kkmly --build-as-nobody option): > > > > http://fink.sodan.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~okayama/tex/fink-build-log_texli

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > I've just tested texlive on 10.5/i386 and no error occurred. > The log file is here (with -Kkmly --build-as-nobody option): > > http://fink.sodan.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~okayama/tex/fink-build-log_texlive_0.20100722-0test7_2011.01.11-19.21.35.gz > > Currently I couldn't figure

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

I've just tested texlive on 10.5/i386 and no error occurred. The log file is here (with -Kkmly --build-as-nobody option): http://fink.sodan.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~okayama/tex/fink-build-log_texlive_0.20100722-0test7_2011.01.11-19.21.35.gz Currently I couldn't figure out why you get such an error, and

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

Martin, Thank you for your test and report. Does that workaround written in the webpage fix the problem on 10.6/64bit in your env? i.e., SetCC: gcc-4.0 SetCXX: g++-4.0 and add the following line before "mkdir texlive/Work". export SDK_ROOT=/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.5.sdk/ And is the workaround

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

On 10/01/11 23:52 , Martin Costabel wrote: [] > No patch yet, but a failure: On 10.6/64bit: [] > It seems that this XeTeXLayoutInterface.cpp uses deprecated QuickDraw > functions that have been removed on 10.6/64bit. There is a discussion of this from last May

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

On 10/01/11 14:16 , Tomoaki Okayama wrote: [] > Some desirous check points: > > * Build/Install (of course) and Update from a current texlive > I've tested only on 10.6/32bit, clean env, so I'm not sure whether > it works on other env. On 10.5/i386, "phase compiling: texlive-0.20100722-0test7

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

On 10/01/11 14:16 , Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > Dear Fink developers, > > We have managed to update TeX Live to the latest version (2010), > and now it seems a time to test it publicly! Thanks for the hard work. > If you would like to test it, checkout the finkinfos as follows: > > $ cvs -d :pserver

[Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

Dear Fink developers, We have managed to update TeX Live to the latest version (2010), and now it seems a time to test it publicly! If you would like to test it, checkout the finkinfos as follows: $ cvs -d :pserver:anonym...@fink.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/fink checkout -P -d text experimenta