On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 01:47:20AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
Alexander Hansen wrote:
[]
There was an official update of 10.4's X11 via Software Update. And on
Leopard a number of the system updates included files in the X11
distribution.
I agree with Jack on the fact that the xquartz
On Sep 18, 2009, at 7:23 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Martin,
I don't follow your last statement. My understanding is that X11
in Snow Leopard is already preconfigured to hand off to an X11 in /opt
if present (remember that Jeremy Huddleston is both X11 maintainer at
Apple as well as the
David R. Morrison wrote:
On Sep 18, 2009, at 7:23 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Martin,
I don't follow your last statement. My understanding is that X11
in Snow Leopard is already preconfigured to hand off to an X11 in /opt
if present (remember that Jeremy Huddleston is both X11 maintainer
2009/9/18 Martin Costabel costa...@wanadoo.fr:
David R. Morrison wrote:
On Sep 18, 2009, at 7:23 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Martin,
I don't follow your last statement. My understanding is that X11
in Snow Leopard is already preconfigured to hand off to an X11 in /opt
if present (remember
On Sep 18, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
2009/9/18 Martin Costabel costa...@wanadoo.fr:
David R. Morrison wrote:
On Sep 18, 2009, at 7:23 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Martin,
I don't follow your last statement. My understanding is that X11
in Snow Leopard is already
2009/9/18 David R. Morrison d...@finkproject.org:
On Sep 18, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
2009/9/18 Martin Costabel costa...@wanadoo.fr:
David R. Morrison wrote:
On Sep 18, 2009, at 7:23 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
Martin,
I don't follow your last statement. My understanding
Michal Suchanek wrote:
2009/9/18 Martin Costabel costa...@wanadoo.fr:
[]
completely over to /opt/X11, which means changing every single package
and forcing everyone to abandon the system X11.
Well, perhaps you can introduce a variable which specifies the X
location so most packages can be
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 05:58:00PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
Michal Suchanek wrote:
2009/9/18 Martin Costabel costa...@wanadoo.fr:
[]
completely over to /opt/X11, which means changing every single package
and forcing everyone to abandon the system X11.
Well, perhaps you can introduce a
Jack Howarth wrote:
Martin,
It is a bit extreme to say the Jeremy has gone
off the deep end with bleeding edge. Completely
I didn't say off the deep end. What he does is still very valuable,
but in a different way from before. In the long run, it will probably
benefit all users of X11 on
Martin,
Well, the problem is that the bulk (if not all)
of X11 Xquartz will likely appear in a future software
update of the X11 components from Apple. This really
the main reason I moved over to MacPorts. A number of
times in the past X11 Xquartz changes have broken pymol
and I don't want to
Jack Howarth wrote:
Martin,
Well, the problem is that the bulk (if not all)
of X11 Xquartz will likely appear in a future software
update of the X11 components from Apple.
Not that it won't or that I wouldn't like to see it, but when has this
ever happened before? --Robert
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:35:26AM -0500, Robert Wyatt wrote:
Jack Howarth wrote:
Martin,
Well, the problem is that the bulk (if not all)
of X11 Xquartz will likely appear in a future software
update of the X11 components from Apple.
Not that it won't or that I wouldn't like to see it,
Jack Howarth wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:35:26AM -0500, Robert Wyatt wrote:
Jack Howarth wrote:
Martin,
Well, the problem is that the bulk (if not all)
of X11 Xquartz will likely appear in a future software
update of the X11 components from Apple.
Not that it won't or that I
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:55:49AM -0500, Robert Wyatt wrote:
Jack Howarth wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:35:26AM -0500, Robert Wyatt wrote:
Jack Howarth wrote:
Martin,
Well, the problem is that the bulk (if not all)
of X11 Xquartz will likely appear in a future software
update of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Wyatt wrote:
Jack Howarth wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:35:26AM -0500, Robert Wyatt wrote:
Jack Howarth wrote:
Martin,
Well, the problem is that the bulk (if not all)
of X11 Xquartz will likely appear in a future software
update of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jack Howarth wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:12:47PM -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Robert Wyatt wrote:
Jack Howarth wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:35:26AM -0500, Robert Wyatt wrote:
Jack Howarth wrote:
Martin,
Well, the problem is that
Alexander Hansen wrote:
[]
There was an official update of 10.4's X11 via Software Update. And on
Leopard a number of the system updates included files in the X11
distribution.
I agree with Jack on the fact that the xquartz development improved the
official X11. The latest softwareupdated X11
Jeremy H has just released XQuartz 2.4.1_alpha1 for Snow Leopard. I'm
going to continue to work through building the bundle- packages with the
X11 that shipped with 10.6 for now unless you folks think that it
shouldn't matter (in which case I would install the alpha).
--Robert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Wyatt wrote:
Jeremy H has just released XQuartz 2.4.1_alpha1 for Snow Leopard. I'm
going to continue to work through building the bundle- packages with the
X11 that shipped with 10.6 for now unless you folks think that it
shouldn't
Alexander Hansen wrote:
Robert Wyatt wrote:
Jeremy H has just released XQuartz 2.4.1_alpha1 for Snow Leopard. I'm
going to continue to work through building the bundle- packages with the
X11 that shipped with 10.6 for now unless you folks think that it
shouldn't matter (in which case I
20 matches
Mail list logo
