: Re: [Fink-devel] fatback in fink
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nick,
can you offer a complete package with proper licensing now? Where can we
get your 'official' version from? It would be more appropriate than us
putting too much weight on an email ;)
cheers,
martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nicholas Harbour has sent me a tar with fatback-1.4 sporting a proper
GPL in the COPYING file.
Will this sort the problem out?
cheers,
martin
- --
- --
Martin Langhoff http://nzl.com.ar/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4
David R. Morrison wrote:
Remi,
The case as you state it seems clear to me. I'm removing the package.
(As you have undoubtedly discovered yourself, the maintainer's email
does not function.)
While it is correct to remove the package (DMCA and PATRIOT acts being
what they are), I think that the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim White wrote:
| While it is correct to remove the package (DMCA and PATRIOT acts being
| what they are), I think that the meaning of all this is that the
| restriction stated in the fatback manual is a violation of GPL.
Correct. And yet we have a
| To: Remi Mommsen
| Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; James Kelly; Harbour, Nicholas
| Subject: Re: [Fink-devel] fatback in fink
|
|
| Remi Mommsen wrote:
| |
| | * NOTICE:
| | * The following license applies only to the
| | * files getopt.c, getopt.h, and getopt1.c
To: Remi Mommsen
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; James Kelly; Harbour, Nicholas
Subject: Re: [Fink-devel] fatback in fink
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Remi Mommsen wrote:
|
| * NOTICE:
| * The following license applies only to the
| * files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Remi Mommsen wrote:
|
| * NOTICE:
| * The following license applies only to the
| * files getopt.c, getopt.h, and getopt1.c.
| * these are borrowed from glibc.
| * This licence does not in any way apply
| *
