Re: [Fink-devel] fvp changes

2013-06-24 Thread TheSin
I don't believe I messed with the standalone version, though it could easily be added, my only focus was the --apt output. Since i"m not sure what relies on the standalone I couldn't test if it would break anything. --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins and ends with chaos, live betwe

Re: [Fink-devel] fvp changes

2013-06-23 Thread Daniel Macks
Global $config is fine in this situation (UseFinkModules compartmentalizes the handling of some initialization, and it does export some Fink::Services functions into the main namespace). Is --apt ode fixed for this new more-detailed output in standalone mode (when /sw/lib/perl5 (or in whatever

Re: [Fink-devel] fvp changes

2013-06-23 Thread TheSin
I'd really like to get this committed before the next release if possible, any other objections or can I go a head and commit it to master? --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! On 2013-06-22, at 7:36 PM, TheSin wrote: > Okay now it works,

Re: [Fink-devel] fvp changes

2013-06-22 Thread TheSin
Okay now it works, standalone, --apt and --dpkg all tested, hopefully declaring $config as a global isn't bad ;) fvp.patch Description: Binary data --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! On 2013-06-22, at 7:30 PM, TheSin wrote: > I take

Re: [Fink-devel] fvp changes

2013-06-22 Thread TheSin
the arch was the only thing I was a little on the fence about, I used all cause i knew it'd work and give the least amount of grief but really I think it should be the system's arch, but I wanted to talk to you about that, what is the best fink function to return x86_64? Sorry I haven't been re

Re: [Fink-devel] fvp changes

2013-06-21 Thread Daniel Macks
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:11:20 -0600, TheSin wrote: The new apt is much more strict on the fields in status files, to get it to work I need to make a few minor changes to f-v-p, I spent lots of time working on apt 0.9.82 trying to figure out why girts weren't working and it turns out the parser w

[Fink-devel] fvp changes

2013-06-20 Thread TheSin
The new apt is much more strict on the fields in status files, to get it to work I need to make a few minor changes to f-v-p, I spent lots of time working on apt 0.9.82 trying to figure out why girts weren't working and it turns out the parser was considering them invalid due to missing fields l