On 9/5/06, Peter Dyballa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Am 05.09.2006 um 15:22 schrieb Alexander Hansen:
>
> > But what happened just before this?
>
> Before these steps of selfupdate/update-all, *days* before, libjasper
> was installed.
>
> > fink usually tries to remove a package that is buildcon
Am 05.09.2006 um 15:22 schrieb Alexander Hansen:
> But what happened just before this?
Before these steps of selfupdate/update-all, *days* before, libjasper
was installed.
> fink usually tries to remove a package that is buildconflicted.
> What you're showing looks like what I said before:
Am 05.09.2006 um 04:41 schrieb Alexander Hansen:
You never specified explicity what happened so i don't really have
enough information to tell you more about what you could have done.
If it failed because of a build conflict being swapped back in
prematurely, then this generally goes away with
On 9/5/06, Peter Dyballa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Am 05.09.2006 um 04:41 schrieb Alexander Hansen:
>
> > You never specified explicity what happened so i don't really have
> > enough information to tell you more about what you could have done.
> > If it failed because of a build conflict bein
On 9/4/06, Peter Dyballa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Am 04.09.2006 um 01:34 schrieb Alexander Hansen:
>
> >> When trying an update-all after a selfupdate, this failed because
> >> libjasper1 had to be removed – and it is too hard to ask my
> >> permission? Even the package gets re-installed afte
Am 04.09.2006 um 01:34 schrieb Alexander Hansen:
>> When trying an update-all after a selfupdate, this failed because
>> libjasper1 had to be removed – and it is too hard to ask my
>> permission? Even the package gets re-installed afterwards?
>
> The engine isn't perfect--it will try to put the c
Jens Noeckel wrote:
[]
> So I think the best fix is to submit a new ghostscript.info file
> which has the configure flag --without-jasper and then no longer
> needs a BuildConflict entry.
I committed this to CVS. I also put you as new maintainer, as you said
you would accept(*). The revision
On Sep 3, 2006, at 4:34 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 9/3/06, Peter Dyballa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> When trying an update-all after a selfupdate, this failed because
>> libjasper1 had to be removed – and it is too hard to ask my
>> permission? Even the package gets re-instal
On 9/3/06, Peter Dyballa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> When trying an update-all after a selfupdate, this failed because
> libjasper1 had to be removed – and it is too hard to ask my
> permission? Even the package gets re-installed afterwards?
It's a BuildConflict. Fink tries to remove
Hello!
When trying an update-all after a selfupdate, this failed because
libjasper1 had to be removed – and it is too hard to ask my
permission? Even the package gets re-installed afterwards?
When then doing the re-build and re-install by hand, the complete /sw/
share/ghostscript/8.51 bran
Am 03.09.2006 um 16:04 schrieb Peter Dyballa:
When then doing the re-build and re-install by hand, the complete /
sw/share/ghostscript/8.51 branch was removed.
This is not the proper method!
Sorry! This is my fault: I had my own examples directory still in the
old 'transitional' tree. Not
11 matches
Mail list logo
