Re: [Fink-devel] libdnet/libdnet1

2005-05-09 Thread TheSin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 there are exceptions though Peter. Libs that are using for loadable modules need to be shared, like for imap support in php4/5. I can build php with imap support using static libs but then it is built into the core and if there was a security ri

Re: [Fink-devel] libdnet/libdnet1

2005-05-09 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 |>> What is the reason for this weird situation? Shouldn't the reason at |>> least be mentioned in the info file? The reason seems to be that Justin patched the old (stable) libdnet to build shared libraries. It did not build shared on any platform, so

Re: [Fink-devel] libdnet/libdnet1

2005-05-09 Thread TheSin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 because fink policy states that shlibs should use the major version of lib in the pkgname, and this pkg was way out of date so i switched it. The only thing that depends on it is nessus, so i told the nessus maintainer about it and he switched th

Re: [Fink-devel] libdnet/libdnet1

2005-05-08 Thread Martin Costabel
TheSin wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yup that is the fix, you could use %v-%r though. To me, the section in the unstable libdnet SplitOff: << Package: %N1-shlibs Conflicts: %N-shlibs Replaces: %N (<< 1.5-2), %N-shlibs looks very much in contradiction with Fink shlibs po

Re: [Fink-devel] libdnet/libdnet1

2005-05-08 Thread Corey Halpin
On 2005-05-08, TheSin wrote: > Yup that is the fix, you could use %v-%r though. I've got a few things on my list to do with those packages. They're going to have to wait until next week after Thursday. When I'm done taking semester finals and also done presenting proposals for funding at work.

Re: [Fink-devel] libdnet/libdnet1

2005-05-08 Thread TheSin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yup that is the fix, you could use %v-%r though. - --- TS http://southofheaven.org/ Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 8-May-05, at 8:31 PM, Corey Halpin wrote: On 2005-05-08, Rob Braun wrote: While trying to build nessus-ssl,

Re: [Fink-devel] libdnet/libdnet1

2005-05-08 Thread Corey Halpin
On 2005-05-08, Rob Braun wrote: > While trying to build nessus-ssl, I came across an interesting > problem with libdnet. The root of the problem is > 10.4-transitional/stable libdnet installs the shlibs as > libdnet-shlibs and unstable installs them as libdnet1-shlibs > with no provides, or other

Re: [Fink-devel] libdnet/libdnet1

2005-05-08 Thread TheSin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 we are working on this problem... - --- TS http://southofheaven.org/ Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest. On 8-May-05, at 4:47 PM, Rob Braun wrote: While trying to build nessus-ssl, I came across an interesting problem with libdnet

[Fink-devel] libdnet/libdnet1

2005-05-08 Thread Rob Braun
While trying to build nessus-ssl, I came across an interesting problem with libdnet. The root of the problem is 10.4-transitional/stable libdnet installs the shlibs as libdnet-shlibs and unstable installs them as libdnet1-shlibs with no provides, or other compatibility tags. So, when I have unst