Re: [Fink-devel] molmol and Leopard

2007-10-29 Thread Martin Costabel
Benjamin Reed wrote: [] Since Apple supports a modern X11 I don't intend to maintain old X11's on 10.5 anymore. What is ironic is that the new X11 is so buggy that even Ben Byer has said publicly yesterday that if you want things like fullscreen mode or a working middle mouse button emulation

Re: [Fink-devel] molmol and Leopard

2007-10-28 Thread wgscott
Hi Jack (et al): Sorry that I am not on top of this. I pre-ordered 10.5 a month ago, but it hasn't yet arrived. (Much like pre-boarding an aircraft has nothing to do with the subsequent 2 hour flight delay.) If fink will still have an X11, and if making it work with Apple's new X11 appears

Re: [Fink-devel] molmol and Leopard

2007-10-28 Thread Alexander K. Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Jack (et al): Sorry that I am not on top of this. I pre-ordered 10.5 a month ago, but it hasn't yet arrived. (Much like pre-boarding an aircraft has nothing to do with the subsequent 2 hour flight delay.) If fink

Re: [Fink-devel] molmol and Leopard

2007-10-28 Thread Benjamin Reed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If fink will still have an X11, and if making it work with Apple's new X11 appears hopeless, could we instead make it depend on Fink's X11? Fink does not have an X11 on 10.5, maintaining separate xfree86 and xorg packages

[Fink-devel] molmol and Leopard

2007-10-27 Thread Jack Howarth
Does anyone have an insight on why the hack being used for freeglut fails when applied to the molmol package? Specifically, if you change the line... + -lSM -lICE -lm -lc -lGLU -lGL -lGLw -lmx in the molmol.patch file to... + -lSM -lICE -lm -lc -lGLU