On 11/15/06, David Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 15, 2006, at 9:28 PM, Lars Rosengreen wrote:
>
> > On 11/15/06, Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Linking to the system's openssl allows us to redistribute the
> >> packages
> >> in binary form if there aren't any o
On Nov 15, 2006, at 9:28 PM, Lars Rosengreen wrote:
> On 11/15/06, Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Linking to the system's openssl allows us to redistribute the
>> packages
>> in binary form if there aren't any other cryptographic issues that
>> require the packages to be unde
On 11/15/06, Lars Rosengreen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/15/06, Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Linking to the system's openssl allows us to redistribute the packages
> > in binary form if there aren't any other cryptographic issues that
> > require the packages to be und
On Nov 15, 2006, at 9:12 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> On 11/15/06, David Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 15, 2006, at 8:32 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 15, 2006, at 2:44 PM, David Reiser wrote:
>>>
I've been wrangling with gnucash dependencies for a while. Earl
On 11/15/06, Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Linking to the system's openssl allows us to redistribute the packages
> in binary form if there aren't any other cryptographic issues that
> require the packages to be under a Restrictive license.
I think it is probably still possible t
On 11/15/06, David Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 15, 2006, at 8:32 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>
> >
> > On Nov 15, 2006, at 2:44 PM, David Reiser wrote:
> >
> >> I've been wrangling with gnucash dependencies for a while. Early on
> >> it was possible to avoid the crypto tree by gettin
On Nov 15, 2006, at 8:32 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>
> On Nov 15, 2006, at 2:44 PM, David Reiser wrote:
>
>> I've been wrangling with gnucash dependencies for a while. Early on
>> it was possible to avoid the crypto tree by getting unified versions
>> of libofx and crypt-ssleay-pm packaged.
>>
>>
On Nov 15, 2006, at 2:44 PM, David Reiser wrote:
> I've been wrangling with gnucash dependencies for a while. Early on
> it was possible to avoid the crypto tree by getting unified versions
> of libofx and crypt-ssleay-pm packaged.
>
> Gwenhywfar and aqbanking will be crypto for the foreseeable f
I've been wrangling with gnucash dependencies for a while. Early on
it was possible to avoid the crypto tree by getting unified versions
of libofx and crypt-ssleay-pm packaged.
Gwenhywfar and aqbanking will be crypto for the foreseeable future
because they implement the crypto for the German
