Alexey,
Let me know if you have any comments on how I am building
llvm and llvm-gcc-4.2. I pretty much followed the approach
found in llvm/llvm.spec.in and llvm-gcc-4.2/README.LLVM.
Jack
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 05:21:46PM +0300, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
> On 12/28/07, Jac
On 12/28/07, Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexey,
>I am currently installing both llvm and llvm-gcc-4.2 but
> I am not sure if the first is really required. Hopefully
> the gfortran support will improve over the next few months.
> Here is the comment I got on its current status...
Alexey,
I am currently installing both llvm and llvm-gcc-4.2 but
I am not sure if the first is really required. Hopefully
the gfortran support will improve over the next few months.
Here is the comment I got on its current status...
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2007-December/01196
Cool!
Did you package llvm libraries/headers separately? Or is it just
strictly gcc-oriented package? (sorry, didn't have time to look at it)
On 12/28/07, Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In case anyone is interested, I posted test
> packaging for a llvm-gcc42 package on fink
> trackin
In case anyone is interested, I posted test
packaging for a llvm-gcc42 package on fink
tracking based on a current svn pull for
llvm and llvm-gcc42 branch. The gcc and g++
compilers should be in good shape but the
gfortran compiler still needs some work.
Jack
