A completly off-topic thingy, i just looked through the fink-devel
subscriptions and I must say I am always surprised again about some
of the domain names used to subscribe. I compiled a brief list of the
more well-known ones. while this in no way means that the
companies/organizations listed h
At 14:20 Uhr +0200 22.01.2003, Chris Leishman wrote:
On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 01:38 PM, Max Horn wrote:
At 13:21 Uhr +0200 22.01.2003, Chris Leishman wrote:
Hi Max,
I was wondering if you had an opportunity to look at updating the
gettext package to the 0.11.5 upstream version?
We
Folks, if you have a suggestion or request about changing or improving Fink,
please either post it to one of the trackers or raise the issue on this
mailing list. Do not mail it directly to me.
-- Dave
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 11:23:22 +0100
Subject: New license..
From: David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Mittwoch, Jänner 22, 2003, at 01:52 Uhr, David R. Morrison wrote:
Folks, if you have a suggestion or request about changing or improving
Fink,
please either post it to one of the trackers or raise the issue on this
mailing list. Do
Again, I beg to differ about the importance of this question.
Paying careful attention to licenses is one of Fink's strengths. We have
very rarely made *any* change in license policy, and the recent change
to allow "Restrictive/Distributable" was thoroughly discussed on this
list before it was im
On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 08:10 AM, David wrote:
Actually this was neither meant as request nor suggestion, I would have
added the GPL2 myself to the allowed list of licenses, yet I thought it
would be more polite if you did it, since it does seem that you have
been compiling the list an
I agree GPLv1 or v2 is still GPL.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Our use of the "BSD" license category is already pretty loose -- we lump
>a lot of more-or-less similar licenses together there. I personally don't
>see a need for any more precision in the GPL license category.
-=[JFH] Justin F. Hall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Mittwoch, Jänner 22, 2003, at 02:23 Uhr, Justin Hallett wrote:
I agree GPLv1 or v2 is still GPL.
That is not quite correct, go read the licenses you will notice that
there are legal implications. This why some authors do explicitly
In case anybody is interested in working on epoch support in Fink:
Sylvain started work on this (see
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=607742&group_id=17203&atid=317203),
but there were some issues, and apparently he has no time currently
to work on it. So if your are in
I am going to checkin Chris Zubrzycki's build directory patch real
soon now. This will add a new field to fink.conf, so the
documentation for that needs to be updated. Maybe Chris can do that
himself?
Cheers,
Max
---
This SF.net email is
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 05:27:03 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Send Fink-devel mailing list submissions to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
> or, via email, send a message wit
On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 07:09 AM, Max Horn wrote:
In case anybody is interested in working on epoch support in Fink:
Sylvain started work on this (see
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/
index.php?func=detail&aid=607742&group_id=17203&atid=317203), but
there were some issues, and
12 matches
Mail list logo
