[Fink-users] Grace

2002-01-24 Thread Adriaan Tijsseling
I noticed the new lesstif and I thougth it may fix grace. I rebuild Grace, but now a new error occurs: Warning: XmManager ClassInitialize: XmeTraitSet failed Error: attempt to add non-widget child "DropSiteManager" to parent "xmgrace" which supports only widgets I have the idea Grace itself nee

[Fink-users] XFree86 4.2--more install problems

2002-01-24 Thread Daniel E. Sabath
The latest version no longer chokes on gl.h; now it sees a conflict with xfree86-rootless with libgl. One other interesting note (maybe not that interesting)--I just installed Fink on a "virgin" iMac that just had MacOSX I installed. The XFree86-server/base installations were just fine. Therefore,

Re: [Fink-users] Does the Fink Fileutils offer an improved=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22du=22??=

2002-01-24 Thread Max Horn
At 16:41 Uhr + 24.01.2002, Steve Wall wrote: >One thing I miss from Linux is the improved (gnu?) "du" >tool it supplies which has additional options beyond what >the OS X supplied "du" has. Specifically, it allows you >to limit the degree to which du will dive down into the >filepath you supp

[Fink-users] Does the Fink Fileutils offer an improved =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22du=22??=

2002-01-24 Thread Steve Wall
One thing I miss from Linux is the improved (gnu?) "du" tool it supplies which has additional options beyond what the OS X supplied "du" has. Specifically, it allows you to limit the degree to which du will dive down into the filepath you supply it, providing summary level information instead. I

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base not conflicting properly?

2002-01-24 Thread Justin Hallett
I'm testing it right now... [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >the base and server packages are now updated in CVS. I cannot test since >I don't have the rootless package installed, so pls let me know if it does >or does not fix the problem. ¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·., Ju

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base not conflicting properly?

2002-01-24 Thread Jeff Whitaker
the base and server packages are now updated in CVS. I cannot test since I don't have the rootless package installed, so pls let me know if it does or does not fix the problem. -Jeff On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Max Horn wrote: > At 8:25 Uhr -0500 24.01.2002, Benjamin Reed wrote: > >Late last night I

Re: [Fink-users] fink install: curl vs. wget

2002-01-24 Thread Max Horn
At 18:34 Uhr -0800 23.01.2002, J. H. Palmieri wrote: >Max Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Run "fink configure" and enable passive FTP mode (this is the default >> actually). > >Okay, this works, and I'm not sure why I had configured it otherwise. >Whenever I ran "fink configure" before, wh

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base not conflicting properly?

2002-01-24 Thread Max Horn
At 8:25 Uhr -0500 24.01.2002, Benjamin Reed wrote: >Late last night I did a `fink selfupdate-cvs` and `fink update-all` >and it looks like the xfree86 upgrade didn't work properly. I >ended up with this: > > Preparing to replace xfree86-base 4.1.0-9 (using >.../xfree86-base_4.2.0-1_darwin-powe

Re: [Fink-users] su [username] -c question...

2002-01-24 Thread Max Horn
At 9:46 Uhr +0100 24.01.2002, Alexander Meier wrote: >well what's the latest version then? You have it, it seems :) >i've got > >osx: 10.1.2 >fink --version: >Package manager version: 0.9.7 >Distribution version: 0.3.2a Yup latest. The code in question actually is still in Fink (hey Justin, yo

Re: [Fink-users] Using fink with password-protected proxies

2002-01-24 Thread Max Horn
At 15:28 Uhr +1100 24.01.2002, Stuart Lamble wrote: >First off, a couple of (slightly off-topic) observations: > - The archives at geocrawler don't have any search facility. It's a bit > harsh to expect somebody to wade through nearly 6,000 messages in an > attempt to find relevant infor

Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base not conflicting properly?

2002-01-24 Thread Justin Hallett
I had this issue and had to remove xmms and qt to remove -rootless. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Preparing to replace xfree86-base 4.1.0-9 (using >.../xfree86-base_4.2.0-1_darwin-powerpc.deb) ... > Unpacking replacement xfree86-base ... > dpkg: error processing >/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binar

Re: [Fink-users] su [username] -c question...

2002-01-24 Thread Justin Hallett
Well looks like everything is up to date. Max would probably better be able to answer that question. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Package manager version: 0.9.7 >Distribution version: 0.3.2a > >is there any way I can test why >($username) = getpwuid($sb[4]); > >isn't working correctly?? in order

Fwd: [Fink-users] xfree86-base not conflicting properly?

2002-01-24 Thread Liam mac Lynne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Forgot the "Reply-all". Doh. Begin forwarded message: > From: Liam mac Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu Jan 24, 2002 10:00:48 US/Eastern > To: Benjamin Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Fink-users] xfree86-base not conflicting properly

[Fink-users] xfree86-base not conflicting properly?

2002-01-24 Thread Benjamin Reed
Late last night I did a `fink selfupdate-cvs` and `fink update-all` and it looks like the xfree86 upgrade didn't work properly. I ended up with this: Preparing to replace xfree86-base 4.1.0-9 (using .../xfree86-base_4.2.0-1_darwin-powerpc.deb) ... Unpacking replacement xfree86-base ... dp

[Fink-users] Error vt100

2002-01-24 Thread Pete Versteegen
Hello listees, I'm a very basic Unix user and have recently downloaded and, I believe correctly, installed Fink on my Mac. I'm running Mac OS 10.1.2. I'm trying to use :dselect' to download some software and am getting the following error message: "When trying to run dselect I get the followin

Re: [Fink-users] su [username] -c question...

2002-01-24 Thread Alexander Meier
well what's the latest version then? i've got osx: 10.1.2 fink --version: Package manager version: 0.9.7 Distribution version: 0.3.2a is there any way I can test why ($username) = getpwuid($sb[4]); isn't working correctly?? in order to use it/test it, what do I have to do? On Donnerstag, Janua