Re: [Fink-users] upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a?

On Monday, March 18, 2002, at 05:47 PM, Max Horn wrote: > Somebody worked on a FAQ entry for this one, dunno what happend to this > (I am now offline, so I can't check) Umm... that was me. I sort of winged the format of the submission because at the time that I wrote it, I didn't know that

Re: [Fink-users] upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, March 18, 2002, at 09:27 PM, Rich Ramos wrote: > >>> >> What am I doing wrong now? >>> > >>> > Nothing. Binaries aren't available for the bleeding-edge cvs >>> packages. >>> >>> But I didn't think that 0.3.2a was bleeding edge, it was r

Re: [Fink-users] upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a?

>> >> What am I doing wrong now? >> > >> > Nothing. Binaries aren't available for the bleeding-edge cvs packages. >> >> But I didn't think that 0.3.2a was bleeding edge, it was released on 1/16. >> >> Unless there is a difference between 0.3.2a and 0.3.2a-cvs, if that is the >> case can I go bac

Re: [Fink-users] upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a?

On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Rich Ramos wrote: > >> What am I doing wrong now? > > > > Nothing. Binaries aren't available for the bleeding-edge cvs packages. > > But I didn't think that 0.3.2a was bleeding edge, it was released on 1/16. > > Unless there is a difference between 0.3.2a and 0.3.2a-cvs, if

Re: [Fink-users] upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a?

> >> What am I doing wrong now? > > > Nothing. Binaries aren't available for the bleeding-edge cvs packages. But I didn't think that 0.3.2a was bleeding edge, it was released on 1/16. Unless there is a difference between 0.3.2a and 0.3.2a-cvs, if that is the case can I go back to 0.3.2a (no c

Re: [Fink-users] upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a?

At 7:12 PM -0600 3/18/02, Rich Ramos wrote: >. > >If I run fink upgrade-all it downloads the source and starts >building from scratch, which I don't want to do if the binaries are >available to install. Yes. However, they aren't. >What am I doing wrong now? Nothing. Binaries aren't availabl

Re: [Fink-users] upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a?

On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Rich Ramos wrote: > However I'm having a follow on problem. Based on the input earlier I > went with the 'fink selfupdate-cvs'. (which seems like it agrees with > the link). Now, I have what seems the be the latest install and package > version: > Package manager version:

Re: [Fink-users] Problems with fink and dselect

On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Wizard Consulting wrote: > I went ahead and used the "fink remove " to remove X11 (it was > called xfree86-base). Ok, though if you want to use an X11 stuff, you'll have to reinstall it or one of the other X server packages out there. > FYI, the error messages I got were

Re: [Fink-users] upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a?

Thanks for the help and the link. This explains a lot. However I'm having a follow on problem. Based on the input earlier I went with the 'fink selfupdate-cvs'. (which seems like it agrees with the link). Now, I have what seems the be the latest install and package version: Package manager

Re: [Fink-users] axyftp failure to compile

thanks, removing lesstif did it. will have to live without nedit, though (no problem since i more or less switched to bbedit) michael. On Monday, March 18, 2002, at 11:28 AM, Justin Hallett wrote: > i thought i fixed this issue, it conflicts with lesstif. make sure > lesstif isn't installed

Re: [Fink-users] upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a?

At 17:40 Uhr -0500 18.03.2002, Alexander Strange wrote: >Not if there was a bug in 0.3.1. Which there was. > >On Monday, March 18, 2002, at 04:49 PM, Rich Ramos wrote: >>All I'm trying to do is update to a point release (0.3.2a). So I >>should be able to do that without using CVS. > > Not a ver

Re: [Fink-users] upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a?

Not if there was a bug in 0.3.1. Which there was. On Monday, March 18, 2002, at 04:49 PM, Rich Ramos wrote: > All I'm trying to do is update to a point release (0.3.2a). So I > should be able to do that without using CVS. -- Alexander Strange | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - The limerick, a verse form

Re: [Fink-users] upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a?

That doesn't agree with the User Manual. Specifically from: "If you have Fink 0.2.5 or later, the first step can be accomplished by running fink selfupdate. That command will check with the Fink website to see if a new point release is

Re: [Fink-users] upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a?

answering yes here is the only way. unless you do a manual cvs and inject it. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >The selfupdate function can track point releases or it can set up your >Fink >installation to update package descriptions from CVS. Updating from CVS >has >the advantage that it is more up to

[Fink-users] upgrade from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a?

I'm trying to upgrade the package list from 0.3.1 to 0.3.2a and it just doesn't seem to want to do it. I've tried three different ways and none seem to work: --- 1. apt-get update: [/sw] root# fink --version Package manager version: 0.9.6a Distribution version: 0.3.1

[Fink-users] Re: OmniWeb displaying Times as Symbol font - fink related?

Nevermind, solved it. -- Oscar Erlandsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oscar Erlandsson 02-03-18 20.44: > I have discovered a weird problem where OmniWeb 4.1 displays pages that should > use Times with the Symbol font instead, rendering them completely unreadable. > I just (re-)discovered this as I inst

[Fink-users] minor grace question

Hi all, I just finished installing grace on 3 machines, all v10.1.3, all after updating Fink. FWIW, fink-install cannot find a file but apt-get install works. First try on my desktop G4/450 I got the msg abt mising a libdl.dylib, read in here how i needed to install fftw, did so, and grace works

[Fink-users] OmniWeb displaying Times as Symbol font - fink related?

I have discovered a weird problem where OmniWeb 4.1 displays pages that should use Times with the Symbol font instead, rendering them completely unreadable. I just (re-)discovered this as I installed the Beta of version 4.1, and after having thought about it for a while, I remember vaguely somethi

Re: [Fink-users] axyftp failure to compile

i thought i fixed this issue, it conflicts with lesstif. make sure lesstif isn't installed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >hi, > >as the topic says: axyftp failure to compile > >error seems to start here (?): > >... >Making all in XmAxy >cc -DPACKAGE=\"XmAxy\" -DVERSION=\"0.0.1\" -DXTHREADS=1 -I. -

[Fink-users] axyftp failure to compile

hi, as the topic says: axyftp failure to compile error seems to start here (?): ... Making all in XmAxy cc -DPACKAGE=\"XmAxy\" -DVERSION=\"0.0.1\" -DXTHREADS=1 -I. -I. -I./.. -I/usr/X11R6/include -g -O2 -c Notebook.c Notebook.c:11: header file 'Xm/DrawingA.h' not found ./../XmAxy/Note

Re: [Fink-users] Fink needs *you*

On Monday, March 18, 2002, at 01:37 AM, Paul Lieberman wrote: > So what's your definition of > stable as far as Fink is concerned? Compiles and runs and is generally usable. -- Finlay ___ Fink-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.so

Re: [Fink-users] Problems with fink and dselect

On 3/18/02 11:03, "Chris Devers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also note that, in my experience, using dselect has been less than > stellar, for reasons a lot like the ones you describe. If you use fink in > the "standard" way -- "sudo fink install dia" for example -- then it does > go out and

Re: [Fink-users] Problems with fink and dselect

On Monday, March 18, 2002, at 10:28 AM, Wizard Consulting wrote: > I'd really like a response from someone at sourceforge about this. I'm > not > trying to start an uproar, just to determine if I've misunderstood > something > very fundamental or there's something screwy going on here. Well,

Re: [Fink-users] Problems with fink and dselect

On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Wizard Consulting wrote: > It also appears that I now have X11 software in the Mac OS X section of > my system that I did NOT install - the only place I even experimented > with it was under Fink. My understanding is that this is normal: everything Fink installs should end u

[Fink-users] Problems with fink and dselect

Hi - I began using Fink about 3 months ago, just to get some exposure to Unix & to be able to experiment with Unix without messing up my base Mac OS X installation. As of this weekend, I've become VERY discouraged with Fink and some of the problems I'm having. It seems that the claim that Fink

Re: [Fink-users] Fink needs *you*

At 17:37 Uhr -0800 17.03.2002, Paul Lieberman wrote: >This brings up an interesting point. Many of these programs (not the one you >listed here but the ones on the web site) are only marginally stable on >their native platform (in most cases Linux). Hu? What? I think that mysql, apachae, bash, db

Re: [Fink-users] xdvi install fails

It's probably been moved because it's an out of date version. I'll cc the maintainer to let them know that the package info is out of date. Until a change is made, you have a couple of options: 1) If you are willing to use an unstable package, you can install xdvi-22.54 . Check out http://fi