Jim Haug wrote:
>
> Hello. I tried installing the amaya package and its dependent lesstif
> package. Apt-get reports they loaded okay. When I try to run amaya, from
> xterm I get:
>
> dyld: amaya can't open library: /sw/lib/libxmlparse.0.dylib (No such file
> or directory, errno = 2)
Perhaps a
>How did you install this version? Did you use the binary installer?
>dselect? apt-get? cvs? or fink selfupdate? Something must have gone
>wrong. How to correct it depends on the method you used for installing
>in the first place.
I think I originally installed the binary and the last few version
Bob Rodenburg wrote:
> After updating to 10.1.4 (and updating Fink-
> installed software), XDarwin 1.0a3 crashes after
1.0a3 is old.
[]
> XFree86 Version 4.1.99.1 / X Window System
> (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release
> 6510)
> Release Date: xx September 2001
> If the server is o
Shay Telfer wrote:
> >root# fink update fink
> >Reading package info...
> >WARNING: Possible unterminated here-document in
> >"/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11-wm/fvwm2-2.4.6-2.info".
[etc]
Yes, this is a symptom of fink (<< 0.9.9) not understanding the new
splitoff syntax.
The followin
Hello. I tried installing the amaya package and its dependent lesstif
package. Apt-get reports they loaded okay. When I try to run amaya, from
xterm I get:
dyld: amaya can't open library: /sw/lib/libxmlparse.0.dylib (No such file
or directory, errno = 2)
Has anyone else run into a problem li
After updating to 10.1.4 (and updating Fink-
installed software), XDarwin 1.0a3 crashes after
defining either "Rootless" or "Full Screen".
Selecting "Rootless" causes a screen flash,
provides the "X" cursor for a few seconds, , then
OS X reports that XDarwin has crashed. In the
Console window
>At 16:09 Uhr +0800 22.04.2002, Shay Telfer wrote:
>>>This is too old to understand the new "splitoff" packages. You should
>>>do a fink selfupdate.
>>
>>I did that, but nothing happened:
>>
>>>fink selfupdate
>>>rm -f LATEST-FINK
>>>curl -L -s -S -O http://fink.sourceforge.net/LATEST-FINK
>>>
>>>
Dear Ben,
Please read my response to Chris Devers.
Thank You.
On Monday, April 22, 2002, at 09:49 , Ben Hines wrote:
> At 9:22 PM -0400 4/22/02, Chris Devers wrote:
>>
>>> And xmms is still giving me:
>>>
>>> Gdk-WARNING **: locale not supported by C library
>>
>> ...and again, this is just
Chris.. Thanks for your reply...
Actually, it is not working at all...
But on a whim.. I decided to check ProcessViewer.. and there is
xmms!
It is apparently running between 0 and 1.6 % of CPU and uses 0.6
%memory!!
Maybe I just don't understand a thing (actually I don't).
I killed th
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Colin Barrett wrote:
> What are the advantages of each?
They all get you to the same place, so differences are mainly on the level
of interface variations. dpkg and apt are the command line tools that the
others are at least partly built around, and a lot of people -- especi
At 9:22 PM -0400 4/22/02, Chris Devers wrote:
>
>> And xmms is still giving me:
>>
>> Gdk-WARNING **: locale not supported by C library
>
>...and again, this is just a warning, not an error.
For gods sake, as often as this comes up, i think we should patch the
message out of GDK or something
Yep, I'm having the same problem since yesterday. No ideas though.
--
Thom
On Monday, April 22, 2002, at 02:18 PM, David H. Peyton wrote:
> After a 'fink selfupdate-cvs' and 'fink update-all', using the unstable
> tree
> of Fink, on a PowerBook 500 Firewire; OS-10.1.4, and the December
> De
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Carl Morin wrote:
> 1 isuma@[~]: xmms
>
> Gdk-WARNING **: locale not supported by C library
This is what it says it is -- a warning. Most users seem to get lots of
these locale errors with OSX, but they're harmless. What else went wrong?
Did it actually launch after this?
>
I had troubles with xmms as soon as I upgraded to OS X 10.1.4: it
refused to open.
I thought that the whole set up may have been broken somehow so I
decided to remove /sw and to install fink 0.4.0 thinking I would
reinstall a "clean" fink. So I proceeded to reinstall xmms (mozilla
was a good
Kilian Koepsell wrote:
>i had the same problem and i'm not completely sure how i solved it,
>but at some stage i removed all my ~/.gnome and ~/.gnome_private
>directories. you could give it a try (or just login as a new user).
>
It seems that gdk-pixbuf-shlibs needs to be built after gdk-pixbuf.
What are the advantages of each? Personally, I like the interface of
dselect, but everyone seems to be mentioning fink and apt-get. Are these
better somehow? I know fink gets the source instead of a binary, but does
that really make much of a difference? Also, can fink remove the .deb files
like d
After a 'fink selfupdate-cvs' and 'fink update-all', using the unstable tree
of Fink, on a PowerBook 500 Firewire; OS-10.1.4, and the December
Developers' Tools, I got the following result:
/usr/bin/install -c -m 644
/sw/src/freetype2-2.0.8-4/freetype-2.0.8/builds/unix/ft2unix.h
/sw/include/ft2bu
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Alexander Meier wrote:
> > Let the list members know if it helps. If so, then maybe a solution
> > will be found. If not, then we'll try something else & recommend for
> > others to also try something else. Either way we can learn from this.
>
> I'll do that as soon as I find
i had the same problem and i'm not completely sure how i solved it,
but at some stage i removed all my ~/.gnome and ~/.gnome_private
directories. you could give it a try (or just login as a new user).
hope, it helps...
cheers,
kilian
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 03:32:48PM -0400, Keith Mitchell
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, Alexander Meier wrote:
> this actually sounds like a good idea! I've had the same problem as
> John, ever since I first tried just using the >console. I usually
> waited for a few minutes (but I'm sure not more than 5) and just
> forced a restart after getting tired of watchi
Keith Mitchell wrote:
> Craig W. Wright wrote:
>
>> I'm having the same problem except with a source installation. The only
>> things I have installed are the base fink, and the gnome convenience
>> package.
>> Should "fink install gdk-pixbuf-shlibs" work for me, or will I need
>> to do somethi
Craig W. Wright wrote:
>I'm having the same problem except with a source installation. The only
>things I have installed are the base fink, and the gnome convenience
>package.
>
>Should
>"fink install gdk-pixbuf-shlibs"
>work for me, or will I need to do something else?
>
Same here... After
On Sat, 2002-04-20 at 14:16, Max Horn wrote:
> At 22:37 Uhr +0200 20.04.2002, Dr Charles-Henri Malbert wrote:
> >After fink update for unknown reason I lost the icons in gnome menu bar (the
> >bottom one). Similarly, while loading gnome, the window with nice tiny icons
> >at the bottom also lost i
Julius Ross writes:
> I have installed emacs-carbon using fink with (almost) no
> trouble. I was told that I could not install it without first
> removing emacs21which I did and then it worked fine. However
> (to be greedy) is there a possible to have fink install both
> emacs-carbon and em
I have installed emacs-carbon using fink with (almost) no trouble. I
was told that I could not install it without first removing emacs21which
I did and then it worked fine. However (to be greedy) is there a
possible to have fink install both emacs-carbon and emacs with X-support?
Also I am a
>I can't seem to complete an update-all or even update some specific packages:
>
>For example:
>>curl -f -L -O ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/X11/xutils/type1inst-0.6.1.tar.gz
>>curl: (28) Connection aborted
>>### curl failed, exit code 28
>>Downloading the file "type1inst-0.6.1.tar.gz" failed.
>
It worked OK for me just a minute ago. Try again.
--
Alexander K. Hansen
Associate Research Scientist, Columbia University
Levitated Dipole Experiment
MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center, 175 Albany Street, NW17-219
Cambridge, MA 02139-4213
Phone: 617-252-1818Fax:208-988-4057
On Mon,
I can't seem to complete an update-all or even update some specific packages:
For example:
>curl -f -L -O
>ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/X11/xutils/type1inst-0.6.1.tar.gz
>curl: (28) Connection aborted
>### curl failed, exit code 28
>Downloading the file "type1inst-0.6.1.tar.gz" failed.
Any
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Koen van der Drift wrote:
> Suppose I have a package (A) installed that depends on another
> package (B). Now package B is updated - should I then rebuild
> package A too, even though it is not updated?
Generally, no. The reason functionality gets offloaded to shared librar
hi,
usually, you don't even need '--reinstall'. apt-get insall
should do it. packages are kept back, if they need new packages to be
installed or old packages to be removed.
cheers,
kilian
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 10:06:00AM -0400, Warren Pollans wrote:
> From: "Warren Pollans" <[EMAIL PROTE
Hi,
Suppose I have a package (A) installed that depends on another package (B).
Now package B is updated - should I then rebuild package A too, even though
it is not updated?
thanks,
- Koen.
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://li
OK, I "fixed" my problem - apparently these pkgs (some of which I
mis-spelled) had missing dependent pkgs. I did 'sudo apt-get install
--reinstall' for each and the dependencies were installed along
with newer versions of the pkg. Things seem to be OK package-wise
QUESTION: In general, under
I just did "sudo apt-get upgrade" after having done "sudo apt-get update"
and get the following:
...
The following packages have been kept back
audiofile db3 gdbm ghost-script-fonts gmp libjpeg lintiff netpbm python
tcltk
...
What does this mean? Is it something that I can change/fix?
Thank
Hi, Everybody!
I have problems to compile the newest version of iamgemagick-nox.
Please find attached the lines of the output that might be interesting.
Thanks in advance for any help,
Stephan Jaeger
/bin/sh ../libtool --silent --mode=link cc -g -O2 -Wall -L/sw/lib
-L/sw/lib -L/sw/lib -L/sw
At 16:09 Uhr +0800 22.04.2002, Shay Telfer wrote:
>>This is too old to understand the new "splitoff" packages. You should
>>do a fink selfupdate.
>
>I did that, but nothing happened:
>
>>fink selfupdate
>>rm -f LATEST-FINK
>>curl -L -s -S -O http://fink.sourceforge.net/LATEST-FINK
>>
>>You already
At 9:30 Uhr +0200 22.04.2002, Martin Costabel wrote:
>Nicholas Riley wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 08:34:50PM -0700, Adrian and Marie wrote:
>> > Failed: can't install package gdk-pixbuf-shlibs-0.16.0-4
>>
>> Same thing happened to me.
>
>What should work is to remove the gdk-pixbuf adn
Shay Telfer wrote:
> >This is strange, dist version 0.4.0 comes with fink-0.9.11-1. How did
> >you keep the old fink-0.9.7?
>
> I wish I knew!
And if you do "fink rebuild fink"?
--
Martin
___
Fink-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.
>This is too old to understand the new "splitoff" packages. You should
>do a fink selfupdate.
I did that, but nothing happened:
>fink selfupdate
>rm -f LATEST-FINK
>curl -L -s -S -O http://fink.sourceforge.net/LATEST-FINK
>
>You already have the package descriptions from the latest Fink point re
Shay Telfer wrote:
>
> >Shay Telfer wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi...
> >>
> >> When I do a fink install php (to get 4.1.2-1) I get:
> >>
> >> >WARNING: While resolving dependency "gd-shlibs (>= 1.8.4-6)" for
> >> >package "php-4.1.2-1", package "gd-shlibs" was not found.
> >> >Failed: Can't resolve de
>Shay Telfer wrote:
>>
>> Hi...
>>
>> When I do a fink install php (to get 4.1.2-1) I get:
>>
>> >WARNING: While resolving dependency "gd-shlibs (>= 1.8.4-6)" for
>> >package "php-4.1.2-1", package "gd-shlibs" was not found.
>> >Failed: Can't resolve dependency "gd-shlibs (>= 1.8.4-6)" for
>>
Shay Telfer wrote:
>
> Hi...
>
> When I do a fink install php (to get 4.1.2-1) I get:
>
> >WARNING: While resolving dependency "gd-shlibs (>= 1.8.4-6)" for
> >package "php-4.1.2-1", package "gd-shlibs" was not found.
> >Failed: Can't resolve dependency "gd-shlibs (>= 1.8.4-6)" for
> >package "p
Nicholas Riley wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 08:34:50PM -0700, Adrian and Marie wrote:
> > Failed: can't install package gdk-pixbuf-shlibs-0.16.0-4
>
> Same thing happened to me.
What should work is to remove the gdk-pixbuf adn -shlibs pacakges first
and then "fink reinstall gdk-pixbuf gdk
42 matches
Mail list logo
