Re: [Fink-users] XDarwin on PB G3 (1999/Lombard/Bronze)

A S Hodel [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > I've tried several times this week to install xfree86-base and > xfree86-rootless (in that order) on a 1999 PB G3 running Mac OS 10.1. > Installation appears to run normally, but when xfree86-rootless is done, the > XDarwin folder is nearly empty. If I t

Re: [Fink-users] XDarwin on PB G3 (1999/Lombard/Bronze)

On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 10:47:59PM -0500, A S Hodel wrote: > I've tried several times this week to install xfree86-base and > xfree86-rootless (in that order) on a 1999 PB G3 running Mac OS 10.1. > Installation appears to run normally, but when xfree86-rootless is done, the > XDarwin folder is

[Fink-users] XDarwin on PB G3 (1999/Lombard/Bronze)

I've tried several times this week to install xfree86-base and xfree86-rootless (in that order) on a 1999 PB G3 running Mac OS 10.1. Installation appears to run normally, but when xfree86-rootless is done, the XDarwin folder is nearly empty. If I try to run startx -- -quartz or startx -- -fu

Re: [Fink-users] Crash building emacs 21.2-7 (unstable)

On 8/16/02 10:28 PM, "Ben Hines" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Friday, August 16, 2002, at 06:19 PM, Fernando Pereira wrote: > >> Compilation succeeds, but building the saved image crashes. Below I >> include >> the relevant part of the build log and the stack backtrace. OS X >> 10.1.5, >>

Re: [Fink-users] Crash building emacs 21.2-7 (unstable)

On Friday, August 16, 2002, at 06:19 PM, Fernando Pereira wrote: > Compilation succeeds, but building the saved image crashes. Below I > include > the relevant part of the build log and the stack backtrace. OS X > 10.1.5, > December developer tools. > > > Date/Time: 2001-11-07 16:10:04 -0500

[Fink-users] Crash building emacs 21.2-7 (unstable)

Compilation succeeds, but building the saved image crashes. Below I include the relevant part of the build log and the stack backtrace. OS X 10.1.5, December developer tools. -- F Dumping under names emacs and emacs-21.2.1 malloc_cookie: a19000 Regions. 0x 0 - 0x1000, length: 0x100

Re: [Fink-users] Can't build bundle-kde-ssl -- fixed, plus xfreefeedback

At 10:00 AM -0500 8/11/02, Kevin van Haaren wrote: >But when I try to install the bundle-kde-ssl package it runs for a >while then I get: >make[4]: *** [kcm_background.la.closure] Error 1 >make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 >make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 >make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Err

Re: [Fink-users] CUPS

On Friday, August 16, 2002, at 04:41 PM, Curtis Vaughan wrote: > Sorry Fink User for this question, but no one's answering it at the > Apple Discussion group. > > I'm totally lost here. Ok, I downloaded CUPS, but I see according to > docs that I need to install > - JPEG 6b or higher >

[Fink-users] CUPS

Sorry Fink User for this question, but no one's answering it at the Apple Discussion group. I'm totally lost here. Ok, I downloaded CUPS, but I see according to docs that I need to install - JPEG 6b or higher - PNG 1.0.6 or higher - TIFF 3.4 or higher - ZLIB 1.1.3 or higher

Re: [Fink-users] Positive Feedback!

Wow, me too! I had problems with xfrisk dialog boxes not gaining focus, which made adding new players almost impossible and choosing how many armies to move definitely impossible. That was with xfree 4.2.0-10 and the latest Sawfish with gnome. But since the upgrade to 4.2.0-11, that problem

Re: [Fink-users] feedback

> hey, I am looking for some feedback on these packages that are in > unstable: > autoconf25-2.53 Seems okay. > m4 Works fine for me. HTH, Dan -- This email impairs your ability to operate heavy machinery. --

[Fink-users] Positive Feedback!

Hey! Look! Positive feedback! :-) I updated to xfree86 -base and -rootless 4.2.0-11 (from 4.2.0-6, IIRC), and not only did it compile and install without a hitch on the first trey, but it also cleared up a nagging issue I had with siag and nethack. The issue had to do with keyboard input and

Re: [Fink-users] fink cleanup

On Tuesday, August 13, 2002, at 05:40 PM, mathias meyer wrote: > ah yes, now i found it. i was complaining (well, not really, just > mentioning) that fink cleanup has deleted some of my recent .deb's some > days ago. here's the scenario: > > 1) The .info file of package A is in unstable > 2) Pa

Re: [Fink-users] feedback

On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 14:33, Chris Zubrzycki wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > hey, I am looking for some feedback on these packages that are in > unstable: > > autoconf25-2.53 no problems that I know about > m4 ditto ... > di looks fine ... > userutils Seems

[Fink-users] feedback

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hey, I am looking for some feedback on these packages that are in unstable: autoconf25-2.53 m4 libmusicbrainz bitchx bitchx-ssl ckermit gkermit gtkhx gtkhx-ssl minicom bchunk di slay uptimed userutils thanks, - -chris zubrzycki - - -- PGP public ke