Apt normally gets updated right when you do 'fink selfupdate-cvs' (since
it's an essential package).
Fink Commander doesn't update its table while compiling, so you may well
have apt and apt-dev installed. Try running 'fink list -i apt' in a
terminal window.
You probably can go ahead and delete
On vendredi, déc 13, 2002, at 07:58 Europe/Paris, Ben Hines wrote:
[]
He sent me his log, and he did indeed have a corrupt dev tools
install. (no AppKit/AppKit.h)
Result of the default installation, sans DevSDK. Not corrupt, just the
usual Apple castration policy.
--
Martin
Hi, download the file
http://mjpeg.sourceforge.net/MacOS/mpeg2enc
is impossible nor with wget, curl, etc.. to avoid the text/plain mime
downloading, but yet copying it from Contents/Resources of
MPipes/MPEGEncoder.mpipe/Contents/Resources/
gives me the next stupid message
% mpeg2enc
**E
Sounds like that's it, don't you think:
On torsdag, dec 12, 2002, at 23:25 Europe/Stockholm, Mark Jaffe wrote:
Fatal server error:
Quit the Mac OS X window server or use the -quartz option.
Actually, the standard way to start X inside Aqua, is to do
startx -- -rootless
which will give you th
Hello
I have an apt-cacher , but i like to have only that source packages
install on the apt-cacher
that i have now on my powerbook installed. Can i export a list with
this packages that i have installed on my pw g4 ?
That i can say to the apt-cacher please compile every time the new
versions
Hi,
I would like to install mplayer without installing the whole xfree pkg
(to use it with mplayerOSXGUI):
is it possible, and how I do force "fink install" to ignore the
dependencies?
Thanks in advance for help,
gaetano
---
This sf.net email
Martin-
Ben took a look a my log and suggested something similar. I recall
there was an update, then another update to roll back the update, or
something like that. I believe the Apple website said the August update
broke the July tools, so I'm pretty sure I left it at July.
Jerry
On Friday,
Nope, I have the dev tools, been happily compiling things since OS X
first came out. I do have the July tools, which I installed after
updating to Jaguar. Interestingly enough, I was able to update all the
other packages I have installed, plus install some new ones, which is
why this caught me
Hi all, I'm running 10.2.1 on Lombard PBG3, using unstable, and 'fink
--version' now says Package manager version: 0.11.1, Distribution
version: 0.5.0a.cvs.
I'll try to keep this short, but there's some Commander output included
below. I launched FinkCommander to run update-all and selfupdat
Jerry,
The response you got earlier might have been a bit cryptic.
When you install the Developer Tools, you need to be sure to not just do
the default install. Instead, do a custom install and be sure to select
the SDK package.
I'm not sure if this is covered anywhere on the Fink website; sorr
Wow, that's pretty lame! I wonder why Apple did it that way? I did not
know that, and haven't seen anything in the docs covering that. Live
and learn. Thanks.
Jerry
On Friday, December 13, 2002, at 09:43 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Jerry,
The response you got earlier might have been a bit c
Hello:
I was wondering if anyone had had any problems with the functionality
of GIMP after having installed imagemagick? Gimp was working
beautifully until I installed the imagemagick package, and now I get
errors in Gimp where it can't save any graphics - the edited picture
comes out blank.
Okay, I began troubleshooting with an approach I have seen described
repeatedly here--
I mv'ed the offending "/sw/etc/apt/sources.list" to ~/sources.old and
ran update-all again.
Now in the upper window of FinkCommander, apt and apt-dev are listed as
'archived' (but nothing installed) and apt-s
The latest PIL died when I tried to install
building '_imagingft' extension
gcc -DNDEBUG -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -IlibImaging
-I/sw/include/freetype2 -I/sw/include/python2.2 -c _imagingft.c -o
build/temp.darwin-6.2-PowerMacintosh-2.2/_imagingft.o
gcc -L/sw/lib -bundle -bundle_loader /sw/b
Hmmm...it built for me. Judging from the symbol that it complained
about, I'd start by rebuilding freetype2.
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 13:33, Don McKenzie Paul wrote:
> The latest PIL died when I tried to install
>
> building '_imagingft' extension
> gcc -DNDEBUG -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Ilib
Fink-users,
Hi. Ghostscript won't compile for me. It's complaining about
Xsetlocale.
gcc -DHAVE_MKSTEMP -O2 -I/sw/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wcast-qual
-Wwrite-strings -fno-builtin -fno-common
-DGX_COLOR_INDEX_TYPE="unsigned long long"
On Friday, December 13, 2002, at 01:10 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Apt normally gets updated right when you do 'fink selfupdate-cvs'
(since
it's an essential package).
selfupdate and selfupdate-cvs go through the 10.1 tree and into 10.2
but both eventually fail at the /sw/etc/apt/sources.list
Your initial sources.list file is supposed to be installed with the apt
package. Can you install apt by itself (from source, not binary, of
course)?
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 14:23, Michael Bovee wrote:
>
> On Friday, December 13, 2002, at 01:10 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> > Apt normally gets upd
Don: You need to downgrade your freetype2 to version 2.0.9. A newer
version appear briefly in fink CVS and was quickly pulled when it was
discovered to not be backwards compatible (i.e. it does not contain thet
FT_New_Face symbol).
-Jeff
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Don McKenzie Paul wrote:
> The lat
I've been trying to get (te)TeX installed for a while now. I don't need
it for word processing, but as supportive technology for a number of
applications, e.g., natbib. Not any combination of install using fink
gives me any results.
This seems at least as complex as the X story. For the XFree s
Jan Dockx wrote:
I've been trying to get (te)TeX installed for a while now. I don't need
it for word processing, but as supportive technology for a number of
applications, e.g., natbib. Not any combination of install using fink
gives me any results.
What happens when you say "fink install natb
Bonjour Martin,
Don't know, but I'll try. I was actually referring to installing the binary distribution using dselect. Sorry I didn't mention that.
And I can't get that to work. I am just running around, trying to resolve conflicts and dependencies.
On vrijdag, december 13, 2002, at 11:08 h, Ma
Forgive me if this problem has already been addressed, but I just joined
the list and I was unable to find an answer in the web archive.
I installed the xfree86-rootless package with fink. It listed no problems
at installation. I also installed it from source with fink, with the same
results
On Friday, December 13, 2002, at 10:56 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Hmmm...it built for me. Judging from the symbol that it complained
about, I'd start by rebuilding freetype2.
The correct answer to this FAQ is to downgrade your freetype2 by doing
"fink install freetype2-2.0.9-1". No need
On Friday, December 13, 2002, at 11:23 AM, Michael Bovee wrote:
On Friday, December 13, 2002, at 01:10 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Apt normally gets updated right when you do 'fink selfupdate-cvs'
(since
it's an essential package).
selfupdate and selfupdate-cvs go through the 10.1 tree and
Success!
I reinstalled the July dev tools, recompiled and installed xfree86 just
fine. Life is good.
I looked at the custom install, and the SDK package was already
pre-selected, as were all of them. Went ahead and did the Custom
install just to be on the safe side. Is the problem that the Def
I have a quick KDE question and I didn't see anything resembling this
one in the archives, nor did I see anything of use at KDE.org
OS 10.2.2
Fink 0.5.0a.cvs/0.11.1
Today I installed KDE via dselect. I selected kdebase3-ssl and I got
version 3.0.7-3 and the associated dependent files. Eve
I had the exact same problem, and discovered i was missing two
libraries,
libpng3 and libpng3-shlibs
if you do a
fink install libpng3-shlibs libpng3
You should be OK (at least i was)...
--- Jamey Osborne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a quick KDE question and I didn't see anything res
On Friday, December 13, 2002, at 10:37:13 -0500, Michael Bovee wrote:
[snip]
Configuration file `/sw/etc/apt/sources.list'
==> File on system created by you or by a script.
==> File also in package provided by package maintainer.
What would you like to do about it ? Your options are:
29 matches
Mail list logo
