Re: [Fink-users] Trouble installing system-xfree86 with Apple X11

Unfortunately, that version of system-xfree86 won't work with Apple X11 Beta 3. A new version was just put in this evening, so do another "fink selfupdate-cvs" and try again: it should be 4.2-11 On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Drew Tappan wrote: > I'm having issues installing the system-xfree86 package to

Re: [Fink-users] Trouble installing system-xfree86 with Apple X11

Drew Tappan wrote: I'm having issues installing the system-xfree86 package to satisfy pretty much every other dependancy. If you have installed the latest (beta3) Apple X11, you need to install system-xfree86-4.2-11 or higher. I've just committed it to stable, you should be able to do a 'fink

[Fink-users] Trouble installing system-xfree86 with Apple X11

I'm having issues installing the system-xfree86 package to satisfy pretty much every other dependancy. The X11 pkg was downloaded from apple this morning have installed the SDK as required. The error indicates that the pre-installation script is unable to discern the X11 version? For the re

Re: [Fink-users] system-xfree86 and Apple's X11 v3

At 2:00 PM -0500 on 3/18/03, Benjamin Reed wrote: > Please, anyone who is reading this, if you have successfully > installed/upgraded system-xfree86 using Apple's X11, let me know so I > can move it to stable. It works. I just fired up Lyx in the new X11 after updating system-xfree86 from the

[Fink-users] Re: Fink-users digest, Vol 1 #1515 - 2 msgs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've been using the combo all day with no problems... On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 03:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Send Fink-users mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

Re: [Fink-users] system-xfree86 and Apple's X11 v3

Alexander Hansen wrote: This won't be a problem when system-xfree86 gets updated in stable. For right now, I suppose we can tentatively recommend installing the unstable system-xfree86 (but not enabling all of unstable). Yes, all the kinks appear to be worked out. (crosses fingers) Please, anyon

Re: [Fink-users] system-xfree86 and Apple's X11 v3

This won't be a problem when system-xfree86 gets updated in stable. For right now, I suppose we can tentatively recommend installing the unstable system-xfree86 (but not enabling all of unstable). On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 12:15, Pedro Massobrio wrote: > Alexander, > > Then, shall we should recommen

Re: [Fink-users] system-xfree86 and Apple's X11 v3

Begin forwarded message: From: Pedro Massobrio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed Mar 19, 2003 12:47:10 AM Asia/Singapore To: Kow K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Fink-users] system-xfree86 and Apple's X11 v3 Kow, Yes, that's what I thought, but I need confirmation, in order to advice beginner

Re: [Fink-users] system-xfree86 and Apple's X11 v3

My understanding is that the version of system-xfree86 from stable didn't work with Apple X11 0.3, and that's why a new version was made. On Tue, 2003-03-18 at 10:24, Pedro Massobrio wrote: > Hello, > > Which version of 'system-xfree86' is necessary for those who install > 'Apple's X11 PB v3' a

[Fink-users] Help Building MySQL-python?

I have tried everything I know (which is probably not much) to build MySQL-python-0.9.0 using the libraries from fink's mysql-dev package. A slight alteration to setup.py which is used to build and install it. I pointed it to the /sw/include directory to find the mysql libraries there and, thinking

Re: [Fink-users] X11 beta 3, xfree86 threaded together

Sorry Kow, fingers click too quickly on send. Le mardi, 18 mars 2003, à 15:23 Europe/Paris, Kow K a écrit : My suggestion is rather to suggest that you can write a script for Fink. I'm far from being able to do it, sorry. Michèle --

[Fink-users] system-xfree86 and Apple's X11 v3

Hello, Which version of 'system-xfree86' is necessary for those who install 'Apple's X11 PB v3' and 'Fink' for the first time? Will it work with a version prior to 'system-xfree86' 4.2-11 from unstable? Thanks and regards, Pedro --- This

Re: [Fink-users] X11 beta 3, xfree86 threaded together

Le mardi, 18 mars 2003, à 16:02 Europe/Paris, Martin Costabel a écrit : On mardi, mars 18, 2003, at 14:38 Europe/Paris, Michèle Garoche wrote: [] sudo cp /usr/X11R6_bak/lib/libapplexp.1.1.dylib /usr/X11R6/lib sudo cp -R /usr/X11R6_bak/include/xp /usr/X11R6/include I don't see any libapplexp*.dylib

Re: [Fink-users] X11 beta 3, xfree86 threaded together

On mardi, mars 18, 2003, at 14:38 Europe/Paris, Michèle Garoche wrote: [] sudo cp /usr/X11R6_bak/lib/libapplexp.1.1.dylib /usr/X11R6/lib sudo cp -R /usr/X11R6_bak/include/xp /usr/X11R6/include I don't see any libapplexp*.dylib nor any include/xp in beta 0.3. Instead of these there is now /usr/lib/l

Re: [Fink-users] Installing with and without fink

1.3-5 is in stable. On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 17:49, Nathan Dunn wrote: > > Is there a way to get around this, though? It would be nice, since > once dependency on the > > unstable branch will kill remaining updates. > > > > Nathan > > From: Alexander Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon Ma

Re: [Fink-users] netpbm versioning

Not really. I believe that the conflict would be between netpbm and netpbm10, but only one of these gets installed. The -shlibs can coexist. Here's what I have on my system: i netpbm 9.25-3 Graphics manipulation programs and libraries i netpbm-bin 10.12-2 Graphi

Re: [Fink-users] Installing with and without fink

I should add that it's in stable, too. On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 15:18, Alexander Hansen wrote: > Unfortunately, you can't do this automatically, because fink unpacks the > tarball every time. > > doxygen-1.3-5 is available now. You might try doing a selfupdate-cvs > and try it instead. > > On Mon,

[Fink-users] X11 beta 3, xfree86 threaded together

After checking the differences, I've ended with the following steps. Could you tell me if you're OK with it. To change to X11 beta 3 with xfree threaded and X11 together 1 - sudo dpkg -r --force-depends xfree86-rootless-threaded xfree86-rootless-threaded-shlibs xfree86-base-threaded xfree86-ba

Re: [Fink-users] failing to compile kdevelop

Daniel Wyeth wrote: I have reposted this to the list in the hopes that someone of more knowledge than I, might see something that I have missed, or at least be able to suggest a new angle of attack. At present all that I can recommend is to check that you're using the latest version. If you are

Re: [Fink-users] failing to compile kdevelop

Le Lundi, 17 Mars 2003, à 02:32 Australia/Melbourne, Jean Richelle a écrit : Hi all, I'm trying to compile kdevelop but it fails ( cf end of compilation msgs). Any idea of what to do to solve that ? Regards, Jean scriptingpart.cpp:131: syntax error before `<<' token scriptingpart.cpp:133: `gui

[Fink-users] Strange error msgs in xemacs

After updating Apple's X11 to its latest version (0.3), xemacs ( 21.5.9-4) keeps outputting error messages like the following: xemacs: X Error of failed request: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) Major opcode of failed request: 55 (X_CreateGC) Serial number of failed request: 3371 C

Re: [Fink-users] EPS ghostscript

Martin von Weissenberg wrote: FWIW, I removed all fink ghostscript installations, installed the ESPGS package manually, then installed system-ghostscript-7.05-3. Seems to work fine. [] On maanantai, maalis 17, 2003, at 08:31 Europe/Helsinki, Andrew Hartung wrote: I need to install hpijs which

Re: [Fink-users] Internal error: node for ghostscript6 already exists

Jeremy Fox wrote: [] Internal error: node for ghostscript6 already exists No idea about this. [] Also, does ghostscript8 produce PDFs viewable in Apple's Preview.app? Is there a reason to stick with Ghostscript 6? The only problem I am having with ghostscript-8 is with importing images into texma

Re: [Fink-users] EPS ghostscript

FWIW, I removed all fink ghostscript installations, installed the ESPGS package manually, then installed system-ghostscript-7.05-3. Seems to work fine. --Martin On maanantai, maalis 17, 2003, at 08:31 Europe/Helsinki, Andrew Hartung wrote: I need to install hpijs which needs ESP Ghostscrip