Re: [Fink-users] Cannot compile libglade2

2005-03-24 Thread Martin Costabel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am trying to install libglade2 and I get this error during 'make' (configure runs ok) gcc -dynamiclib -o .libs/libglade-2.0.0.0.3.dylib .libs/glade-init.o .libs/glade-xml.o .libs/glade-parser.o .libs/glade-gtk.o /usr/X11R6/lib/libXcursor.dylib

Re: [Fink-users] gnomemeeting compilation problem

2005-03-24 Thread Carsten Bormann
Fink gnomemeeting is MIA. The current release of gnomemeeting is 1.2.1. Fink has 0.98.0-11, which doesn't compile (and hasn't been compiling for what seems like 2^25 seconds now, error message below). I'm just raising this again to see whether there are any gnome people out there. I know we are

[Fink-users] rmagic problems

2005-03-24 Thread Patrick Gormley
I'm new to this list, but has anyone been able to install Report Magic (rmagic)? Installation stops when attempting to install gd-textutil-pm581. Trying to install it on a G4 800 MHz machine with OS 10.3.6. I have also tried to install this on a G5 2 Gig Hz running OS 10.3.8 and it locks the

Re: [Fink-users] gconf-1.0.9-22 build failure

2005-03-24 Thread Charles Williams
Thanks for your help, Martin. I have one other question: Should I still have the cctools-gcc4 package? From the description, it sounds like something that may have been installed after I installed the other version of cctools myself, but it's still showing up as installed. I also have

Re: [Fink-users] gconf-1.0.9-22 build failure

2005-03-24 Thread Martin Costabel
Charles Williams wrote: Thanks for your help, Martin. I have one other question: Should I still have the cctools-gcc4 package? From the description, it sounds I had completely forgotten (and had to refresh my memory from the cvs log): This was a short-lived experiment (I think the package

Re: [Fink-users] rmagic problems

2005-03-24 Thread Martin Costabel
Patrick Gormley wrote: I'm new to this list, but has anyone been able to install Report Magic (rmagic)? Installation stops when attempting to install gd-textutil-pm581. Trying to install it on a G4 800 MHz machine with OS 10.3.6. I have also tried to install this on a G5 2 Gig Hz running OS

[Fink-users] net-snmp won't build

2005-03-24 Thread Mike O'Brien
I'm doing a selfupdate followed by update-all. Fink shows: Package manager version: 0.24.1 Distribution version: 0.7.1.rsync It's got about 229 packages to update. Net-snmp, however, won't compile: /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -Ddarwin7 -o snmpd snmpd.lo -L/sw/lib

[Fink-users] Re: net-snmp won't build

2005-03-24 Thread Robert Wyatt
This is the identical error that I got this morning (see fink-beginners list). I think the bigger question for both of us is WHY is it trying to install this package when net-snmp-ssl is already installed? (It is on my machine, yours Mike?) -bash-2.05b$ fink list snmp Information about 4784

Re: [Fink-users] Re: net-snmp won't build

2005-03-24 Thread Benjamin Reed
Robert Wyatt wrote: This is the identical error that I got this morning (see fink-beginners list). I think the bigger question for both of us is WHY is it trying to install this package when net-snmp-ssl is already installed? (It is on my machine, yours Mike?) If I had to guess, it's because

Re: [Fink-users] Re: net-snmp won't build

2005-03-24 Thread Mike O'Brien
On Mar 24, 2005, at 4:13 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: Robert Wyatt wrote: This is the identical error that I got this morning (see fink-beginners list). I think the bigger question for both of us is WHY is it trying to install this package when net-snmp-ssl is already installed? (It is on my

[Fink-users] Re: net-snmp won't build

2005-03-24 Thread Robert Wyatt
I am installing debfoster now to try to find out what is asking for net-snmp (will this work for files which haven't been installed yet?). I know that the command I issued (all three times) was fink build bundle-kde-ssl. I'm looking through my logs here and will post what I can find on the

Re: [Fink-users] net-snmp won't build

2005-03-24 Thread Neil Tiffin
I get the same problem trying to update-all with KDE updates. Package manager version: 0.24.1 Distribution version: 0.7.1.rsync Neil Tiffin At 2:58 PM -0800 3/24/05, Mike O'Brien wrote: I'm doing a selfupdate followed by update-all. Fink shows: Package manager version: 0.24.1 Distribution

Re: [Fink-users] net-snmp won't build

2005-03-24 Thread Neil Tiffin
I get the same problem trying to update-all with KDE updates. Package manager version: 0.24.1 Distribution version: 0.7.1.rsync Neil Tiffin At 2:58 PM -0800 3/24/05, Mike O'Brien wrote: I'm doing a selfupdate followed by update-all. Fink shows: Package manager version: 0.24.1 Distribution

[Fink-users] Re: net-snmp won't build

2005-03-24 Thread Robert T Wyatt
At 8:54 PM -0600 3/24/05, Robert Wyatt wrote: I haven't used debfoster yet. -bash-2.05b$ debfoster -e net-snmp Not an installed package: net-snmp Sorry, no help. [and sorry about double-posting that last message] --- SF email is sponsored by -

[Fink-users] Re: loader warnings in KDE updates

2005-03-24 Thread Gary K Olson
I have started on the KDE updates to 3.4, and I am getting an enormous number of loader warnings saying that nearly every kde library function overlaps with some Xorg: /usr/X11R6/lib/ library function, so prebinding has been disabled. The only package I have finished compiling so far is the

[Fink-users] Re: gnome-python2-py23

2005-03-24 Thread Flatman
Same thing here, even with gnome-python2-py23-2.0.0-16 On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:28:36 +0100, Nicholas Cole wrote: I'm having a problem installing pybliographic, which only exists in the unstable tree, as far as I can see. So I've added the unstable tree to my fink config. 250 odd packages

Re: [Fink-users] Re: loader warnings in KDE updates

2005-03-24 Thread Martin Costabel
Gary K Olson wrote: I have started on the KDE updates to 3.4, and I am getting an enormous number of loader warnings saying that nearly every kde library function overlaps with some Xorg: /usr/X11R6/lib/ library function, so prebinding has been disabled. The only package I have finished

[Fink-users] Re: gnome-python2-py23

2005-03-24 Thread Daniel Macks
Without addressing this specific error, I'd note that 2.0.0 is a year and a half old...the 2.0 series went to 2.0.3. But if gnome-python numbering tracks that of GNOME itself, there a 2.6.2 (there's also a 2.10 series, but I don't know if it requres GNOME-2.10). There are also many missing