[Fink-users] Re: failed build of kdelibs3-unified-3.4.3-22

2005-10-25 Thread Gary K Olson
I have been unable to build the newest upgrade of kde for the last couple of days. I am getting an error while building kdelibs3- unified after several hours of compiling. Here is the end of my build log. /sw/src/fink.build/kdelibs3-unified-3.4.3-22/kdelibs-3.4.3/kdecore/ kaccelaction.h:47

Re: [Fink-users] Re: gettext-dev v libgettext-dev. A never ending battle...

2005-10-25 Thread Daniel Macks
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 03:18:08PM -0700, William Scott wrote: > I just realized it was re-installing an older version of gettext-dev. > > The new one in unstable behaves ok. May I suggest promoting the new > one (rev. 24) to stable? Last I heard, (hi drm!) there is still a bug in certain upgr

Re: [Fink-users] Re: Re: gettext-dev v libgettext-dev. A never ending battle...

2005-10-25 Thread Daniel Macks
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 03:09:24PM -0700, William Scott wrote: > > Here's what happens if libgettex3-dev is installed and I then do a > fink selfupdate (via cvs): > > [everything works up to this point] > > Updating package index... done. > Information about 2260 packages read in 16 seconds. >

[Fink-users] Re: gettext-dev v libgettext-dev. A never ending battle...

2005-10-25 Thread William Scott
I just realized it was re-installing an older version of gettext-dev. The new one in unstable behaves ok. May I suggest promoting the new one (rev. 24) to stable? Bill On Oct 25, 2005, at 3:09 PM, William Scott wrote: Hi Dan: ... gettext-dev (version 0.10.40-19) is to be installed.

Re: [Fink-users] Broken selfupdate-rsync

2005-10-25 Thread Daniel Macks
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 10:28:17PM +0100, Viv Kendon wrote: > On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Martin Costabel wrote: > > > >And if you reclaim all this via "sudo chown -R vmk"? > > It works again. However, this explains nothing :-) [...] > This one works. So it seems that the latest fink takes > exception

[Fink-users] Re: Re: gettext-dev v libgettext-dev. A never ending battle...

2005-10-25 Thread William Scott
Hi Dan: Thanks for the reply. Here's what happens if libgettex3-dev is installed and I then do a fink selfupdate (via cvs): [everything works up to this point] Updating package index... done. Information about 2260 packages read in 16 seconds. The package 'gettext-dev' will be installed. Th

Re: [Fink-users] Broken selfupdate-rsync

2005-10-25 Thread Viv Kendon
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Martin Costabel wrote: Viv Kendon wrote: [] ls -l /sw/fink total 156 0 drwxr-xr-x 10 root admin 340 Oct 25 19:14 ./ 0 drwxr-xr-x 11 root admin 374 Jun 2 21:31 ../ 0 drwxr-xr-x 10 vmk admin 340 Oct 19 17:37 10.4-transitio

Re: [Fink-users] Re: gettext-dev v libgettext-dev. A never ending battle...

2005-10-25 Thread Daniel Macks
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 12:56:08PM -0700, William Scott wrote: > >Moreover, gettext-dev and libgettext3-dev are only supposed to be > >build-depends for other stuff, and you should therefore never have to > >force remove one or the other. > > libgettext3-dev is left in place after I install or upd

[Fink-users] Re: gettext-dev v libgettext-dev. A never ending battle...

2005-10-25 Thread William Scott
Moreover, gettext-dev and libgettext3-dev are only supposed to be build-depends for other stuff, and you should therefore never have to force remove one or the other. libgettext3-dev is left in place after I install or update (for example) KDE, and the next time I do a fink selfupdate it fails

Re: [Fink-users] Broken selfupdate-rsync

2005-10-25 Thread Martin Costabel
Viv Kendon wrote: [] ls -l /sw/fink total 156 0 drwxr-xr-x 10 root admin 340 Oct 25 19:14 ./ 0 drwxr-xr-x 11 root admin 374 Jun 2 21:31 ../ 0 drwxr-xr-x 10 vmk admin 340 Oct 19 17:37 10.4-transitional/ 4 -rw-r--r--1 root admin

[Fink-users] Broken selfupdate-rsync

2005-10-25 Thread Viv Kendon
Eeek...I've just broken fink selfupdate somehow: I will now run the rsync command to retrieve the latest package descriptions. /usr/bin/su vmk -c "rsync -rtz --delete-after --delete -q --include='10.4-transitional/' --include='10.4-transitional/stable/' --include='10.4-transitional/stable/mai

Re: [Fink-users] Upgrade 0.7.2->0.8.0 does not work

2005-10-25 Thread Jeff Shapiro
On Saturday 22 October 2005 17:30, Moritz wrote: > I wonder how this process would enable fink to find out about a new > tree. It seems fink checks in fink.conf what the current tree is > (10.3), downloads the appropriate CURRENT-FINK-10.3 from SF, which > yields 10.3-0.7.2, installs some stuff, a

[Fink-users] Upgrade 0.7.2->0.8.0 does not work

2005-10-25 Thread Moritz
Hello list, I have been, unsuccessfully, trying to upgrade my fink 0.7.2 distribution to 0.8.0 after I upgraded to Tiger (10.4.2). My fink setup is plain vanilla binary. I got XCode 2.0 installed. So I figured it should be possible to perform an easy upgrade, without trashing /sw and reinsta