[Fink-users] Re: openoffice.org-firefox on 10.3 dependencies

Robert T Wyatt wrote: In the 10.3 tree I have: WARNING: While resolving dependency "archive-zip-pm581 " for package "openoffice.org-firefox-2.0.1+m156-4", package "archive-zip-pm581" was not found. Can't resolve dependency "archive-zip-pm581" for package "openoffice.org-firefox-2.0.1+m156-4"

[Fink-users] polyxmass

In the 10.3-unstable tree I have: Can't resolve dependency "librsvg2-shlibs (>=2.7.2)" for package "polyxmass-0.9.2-2" (no matching packages/versions found) Exiting with failure. i librsvg2-shlibs 2.6.5-10 --- This

[Fink-users] openoffice.org-firefox on 10.3 dependencies

In the 10.3 tree I have: WARNING: While resolving dependency "archive-zip-pm581 " for package "openoffice.org-firefox-2.0.1+m156-4", package "archive-zip-pm581" was not found. Can't resolve dependency "archive-zip-pm581" for package "openoffice.org-firefox-2.0.1+m156-4" (no matching packages/v

Re: [Fink-users] build failure for openoffice.org-firefox-2.0.1+m156-104

On 2/24/06, AIDA Shinra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > > OS 10.4.5, PowerPC using 10.4-transitional tree, XCode 2.1 > > > > I have the JDK 1.5 package installed (if it matters) > > > > I got the following failure with openoffice.org-firefox-2.0.1+m156-104: > (snip) > > And indeed there's n

Re: [Fink-users] libgnomedb update problem

On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Daniel Macks wrote: > ...and I just now committed another round of dependency fixes. So > first make sure you're using 1.0.3-6 now. And if that doesn't build, > please verify that you have these packages installed: > libgnome2-dev > libgnomecanvas2-dev > libgnomeprint2.2

Re: [Fink-users] Invalid call to gcc_select in Fink/Services.pm?

On Feb 24, 2006, at 11:12 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: Looks like you have the same script as I do. How is fink "broken" by not using a script that's on nobody's system but yours? Not so much broken by that, though I had become a bit angry that it had done so in a rather opaque fashion ("gc

Re: [Fink-users] Invalid call to gcc_select in Fink/Services.pm?

On Feb 24, 2006, at 11:21 PM, Matthew Sachs wrote: GCC_SELECT_VERSION="2.14" That's the version that came with Xcode 2.0. The latest version is 2.18. Thought I was on 2.1, and last time I looked Xcode 2.2 was still reported broken with fink. But since I see that's fixed now, I guess it'

Re: [Fink-users] Where's this file come from?

On Feb 24, 2006, at 1:47 PM, Daniel Macks (and others) wrote: The dpkg command knows all about your installed packages. 'dpkg -S poll.h' lists the packages that have a filename matching *poll.h* Cool! Just what the doctor ordered. On system "busticated," > dpkg -S poll.h libpoll: /sw/inclu

Re: [Fink-users] Invalid call to gcc_select in Fink/Services.pm?

On Feb 24, 2006, at 17:11, Derek Homeier wrote: On Feb 24, 2006, at 11:03 PM, Derek Homeier wrote: So could someone enlighten me whether fink has been broken for half a year without anyone else noticing or I have indeed for some weird reason a different gcc_select script in /usr/sbin Oh, jus

Re: [Fink-users] Invalid call to gcc_select in Fink/Services.pm?

On 2/24/06, Derek Homeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi List, > > is it possible that the gcc_select on my system since MacOS .10.4 > should be different from everybody else's? > Calling > #> whence -p gcc_select >/usr/sbin/gcc_select > #> sudo gcc_select --force 4.0 > ***

Re: [Fink-users] Invalid call to gcc_select in Fink/Services.pm?

On Feb 24, 2006, at 11:03 PM, Derek Homeier wrote: So could someone enlighten me whether fink has been broken for half a year without anyone else noticing or I have indeed for some weird reason a different gcc_select script in /usr/sbin Oh, just for information, this one identifies as # Copyr

Re: [Fink-users] build failure for openoffice.org-firefox-2.0.1+m156-104

Hello, > OS 10.4.5, PowerPC using 10.4-transitional tree, XCode 2.1 > > I have the JDK 1.5 package installed (if it matters) > > I got the following failure with openoffice.org-firefox-2.0.1+m156-104: (snip) > And indeed there's no such folder. The contents of > /sw/src/fink.build/openoffice.or

[Fink-users] Invalid call to gcc_select in Fink/Services.pm?

Hi List, is it possible that the gcc_select on my system since MacOS .10.4 should be different from everybody else's? Calling #> whence -p gcc_select /usr/sbin/gcc_select #> sudo gcc_select --force 4.0 *** *** THE gcc_select SCRIPT MUST BE RUN *** *** A

[Fink-users] Re: Where's this file come from?

Jack Repenning wrote: (I often wonder "of which package is a given file a part"; surely this is a FAQ? I couldn't find it in the FAQ...) I believe that 'dpkg -S xxx' is what you are looking for here. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by

Re: [Fink-users] Multiple update problems

On Feb 24, 2006, at 3:09 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: Ah! That can be problematic because the default doesn't always pick the same flavor (-ssl vs non-ssl)--I think it's alphabetical. There's a way to force fink to pick -ssl as default via a flag in fink.conf. For the curious, that feature

Re: [Fink-users] Where's this file come from?

On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 01:41:28PM -0800, Jack Repenning wrote: > > Research discloses that the busticated system has a /sw/include/sys/ > poll.h which does not define POLLNVAL, which gets included in the > configtest.c compile, and so, as stated, POLLNVAL is not defined. > Contrarily, the w

[Fink-users] Re: Where's this file come from?

Jack Repenning wrote: (If you're an historian, you might check my earlier exchange called "Identical systems aren't?"; this is round two in that battle.) I haven't noticed evidence one way or the other, and it may not be related to your present problem, but I would suggest that you make certa

[Fink-users] Where's this file come from?

(If you're an historian, you might check my earlier exchange called "Identical systems aren't?"; this is round two in that battle.) I have two systems that I would like to be pretty much identical, but they aren't cooperating. Latest problem: glib2 won't build on one (the famous "busticate

Re: [Fink-users] Multiple update problems

jkolata wrote: [] /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -i /sw/var/cache/apt/archives/gnome-vfs2-shlibs_2.6.1.1-17_darwin-powerpc.deb Selecting previously deselected package gnome-vfs2-shlibs. dpkg: considering removing gnome-vfs2-ssl-shlibs in favour of gnome-vfs2-shlibs ... dpkg: no, cannot remove gnome-

Re: [Fink-users] Multiple update problems

On 2/24/06, jkolata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In the future, please report such things separately--it makes keeping > > threads straight in the archives a nightmare. > > > > > Sorry...I thought that these were all related. Apparently not. > > > Were you given the option to pick gnome-vfs2-ssl

Re: [Fink-users] Multiple update problems cernlib2005

Hi, On Feb 24, 2006, at 11:24 AM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: On 2/23/06, jkolata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I did a selfupdate-rsync yesterday and then tried an update-all. It failed on the first package, which happened to be autoconf2.5. I then tried to compile the outdated packages one

Re: [Fink-users] libgnomedb update problem

On 24 Feb 2006, at 16:32, David R. Morrison wrote: On Feb 24, 2006, at 7:19 AM, Jean-François Mertens wrote: Dan, Sorry _ I should know (but never used an unmodified 10.4- transitional) _ I thought that gcc-4 was enforced as default in 10.4-transitional ??? (From the context I guess the bu

[Fink-users] Re: [Fink-devel] libgnomeprint2.2-2.12.1-1001

Stan Sanderson wrote: On Feb 24, 2006, at 10:25 AM, Robert T Wyatt wrote: Stan Sanderson wrote: Reporting a successful build _after_ bison installed. Errors before. OS 10.4.5. It also appears to be updating properly on an OS 10.3.9 machine (after installing bison). Stan which bison exactl

Re: [Fink-users] Multiple update problems cernlib2005

On 2/23/06, jkolata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did a selfupdate-rsync yesterday and then tried an update-all. It failed > on the first package, which happened to > be autoconf2.5. I then tried to compile the outdated packages one by one > and most compilations succeeded. I tried > to compile

Re: [Fink-users] Multiple update problems "esound" (really make)

On 2/23/06, jkolata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did a selfupdate-rsync yesterday and then tried an update-all. It failed > on the first package, which happened to > be autoconf2.5. I then tried to compile the outdated packages one by one > and most compilations succeeded. I tried > to compile

Re: [Fink-users] Multiple update problems autoconf2.5

On 2/23/06, jkolata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did a selfupdate-rsync yesterday and then tried an update-all. It failed > on the first package, which happened to > be autoconf2.5. I then tried to compile the outdated packages one by one > and most compilations succeeded. I tried > to compile

Re: [Fink-users] Multiple update problems mozilla

On 2/23/06, jkolata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did a selfupdate-rsync yesterday and then tried an update-all. It failed > on the first package, which happened to > be autoconf2.5. I then tried to compile the outdated packages one by one > and most compilations succeeded. I tried > to compile

Re: [Fink-users] Can't resolve dependency "python23-shlibs" - Scribus - mac os 10.2.8

Title: Re: [Fink-users] Can't resolve dependency "python23-shlibs" - Scribus - mac os 10.2.8 Happy to help and test. I ran the requested command in Terminal and then the installation of Scribus within Fink Commander. Installation went quite fare but failed in the end. Here below is the entire co

[Fink-users] Re: [Fink-devel] libgnomeprint2.2-2.12.1-1001

On Feb 24, 2006, at 10:25 AM, Robert T Wyatt wrote: Stan Sanderson wrote: Reporting a successful build _after_ bison installed. Errors before. OS 10.4.5. It also appears to be updating properly on an OS 10.3.9 machine (after installing bison). Stan which bison exactly? bison 2.0-12 from

[Fink-users] build failure for openoffice.org-firefox-2.0.1+m156-104

OS 10.4.5, PowerPC using 10.4-transitional tree, XCode 2.1 I have the JDK 1.5 package installed (if it matters) I got the following failure with openoffice.org-firefox-2.0.1+m156-104: ... number of local fetches: 2330 total number of fetches: 3637 java -Xms256m -Xmx256m -cp .:../../unxmacxp.pr

[Fink-users] Re: [Fink-devel] libgnomeprint2.2-2.12.1-1001

Stan Sanderson wrote: Reporting a successful build _after_ bison installed. Errors before. OS 10.4.5. It also appears to be updating properly on an OS 10.3.9 machine (after installing bison). Stan which bison exactly? --- This SF.Net ema

Re: [Fink-users] libgnomedb update problem

Le 24 févr. 2006 à 16:32, David R. Morrison a écrit : On Feb 24, 2006, at 7:19 AM, Jean-François Mertens wrote: Dan, Sorry _ I should know (but never used an unmodified 10.4- transitional) _ I thought that gcc-4 was enforced as default in 10.4-transitional ??? (From the context I guess the

[Fink-users] Re: [Fink-devel] libgnomeprint2.2-2.12.1-1001

FYI On Feb 24, 2006, at 7:53 AM, Emily Jackson wrote: On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:26:43 -0500 Daniel Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Anyway, the brand new libgnomeprint2.2-2.12.1-1001 package requires a BuildDepends on bison. It fails to build with the system's version. I assume the same is also

Re: [Fink-users] libgnomedb update problem

On Feb 24, 2006, at 7:19 AM, Jean-François Mertens wrote: Dan, Sorry _ I should know (but never used an unmodified 10.4- transitional) _ I thought that gcc-4 was enforced as default in 10.4-transitional ??? (From the context I guess the build was in 10.4-transitional/unstable) JF Mertens I

Re: [Fink-users] libgnomedb update problem

On 24 Feb 2006, at 13:06, Claus Atzenbeck wrote: I put the complete output to , just in case it is useful for someone. Claus, The output seems to show you didn't have libgnomeui2-dev installed, (absence of "yes" to "checking

Re: [Fink-users] libgnomedb update problem

On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Jean-François Mertens wrote: > But what puzzles me in the above is the absence of bonobo/bonobo-ui- > component.h; > libbonobui2-dev has always been among the build-deps, even in the stable > tree... > Really I think to see what has happened on would have to see the correspond

Re: [Fink-users] libgnomedb update problem

On 24 Feb 2006, at 11:25, Daniel Macks wrote: On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:19:54AM +0100, Claus Atzenbeck wrote: On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Daniel Macks wrote: On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 08:02:53PM +0100, Claus Atzenbeck wrote: Hi, I have Mac OS 10.4.5 and: Package manager version: 0.24.12 Distributi

Re: [Fink-users] libgnomedb update problem

On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:19:54AM +0100, Claus Atzenbeck wrote: > On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Daniel Macks wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 08:02:53PM +0100, Claus Atzenbeck wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have Mac OS 10.4.5 and: > > > Package manager version: 0.24.12 > > > Distribution version: 0.8.

Re: [Fink-users] libgnomedb update problem

On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Daniel Macks wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 08:02:53PM +0100, Claus Atzenbeck wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have Mac OS 10.4.5 and: > > Package manager version: 0.24.12 > > Distribution version: 0.8.0.rsync > > > > And I have problems updating libgnomedb-1.0.3-5: > > > >