Re: [Fink-users] Build error for ghostscript-nox-7.04-3

2010-08-27 Thread Jan Haag
On 8/27/10 3:55 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: No, JERR_ARITH_NOTIMPL is defined in the included file jerror.h. For some reason, however, not this file ./obj/jerror.h is included, but /sw/include/jerror.h, if it exists. The latter file comes from one of Fink's libjpeg packages. And whereas the one

Re: [Fink-users] Build error for ghostscript-nox-7.04-3

2010-08-27 Thread Jan Haag
On 8/27/10 5:29 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: BTW, if I may ask, why do you need the -nox variant? Do you realize that this version of ghostscript is about 8 years old? I don't really care. I was installing bundle-gnome and geda-bundle and it was somewhere downstream... I suppose because I opted

[Fink-users] Build error for ghostscript-nox-7.04-3

2010-08-26 Thread Jan Haag
Hi, on trying to build ghostscript-nox-7.04-3 I encountered the following error: gcc `cat ./obj/cc.tr` -DHAVE_MKSTEMP -O2 -I/sw/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wtraditional -fno-builtin -fno-common -I./obj -Ijpeg -o ./obj/jcinit.o -c

[Fink-users] Autoconf having trouble to find X11 libs on snowleo

2009-09-10 Thread Jan Haag
Hi list, I'm not sure wether or not this is the right place to ask, but on my newly installed Mac OS X 10.6 it looks like any package depending on X11 doesn't find it... As far as I understood the workflow of the autoconf-script, the headers should be found, but the libraries not... The fink

Re: [Fink-users] Autoconf having trouble to find X11 libs on snowleo

2009-09-10 Thread Jan Haag
On Sep 10, 2009, at 6:30 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: Jan Haag wrote: Hi list, I'm not sure wether or not this is the right place to ask, but on my newly installed Mac OS X 10.6 it looks like any package depending on X11 doesn't find it... As far as I understood the workflow of the autoconf

Re: [Fink-users] Autoconf having trouble to find X11 libs on snowleo

2009-09-10 Thread Jan Haag
appropriately. Basically, file a report for each individual package that you want which is having this problem and we'll come up with a fix. - -- Alexander Hansen Fink User Liaison Jan Haag wrote: Well... It basically shows up in configure saying checking for X... no That holds true for any