Re: [Fink-users] Latex luser question upon upgrade: tetex-texmf 3.0-1

2005-06-08 Thread Jean-François Mertens
On 08 Jun 2005, at 03:23, William Scott wrote: Hi Folks: Apologies in advance if this turns out to be a latex issue rather than a fink-specific one. I've been using Latex to typeset chemical formulae. While in the middle of writing a final exam, I decided to update fink, and Tetex

Re: [Fink-users] Latex luser question upon upgrade: tetex-texmf 3.0-1

2005-06-08 Thread Martin Costabel
William Scott wrote: [] \documentclass[11pt]{article} \usepackage{geometry} \geometry{letterpaper} \usepackage[parfill]{parskip} \usepackage {chemarr} \usepackage {pictex} \usepackage {m-ch-en} Are you sure you need \usepackage{pictex}? Doesn't m-ch-en load this already, so that you have it

Re: [Fink-users] Latex luser question upon upgrade: tetex-texmf 3.0-1

2005-06-08 Thread Jens Nöckel
On Jun 8, 2005, at 12:26 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: William Scott wrote: [] \documentclass[11pt]{article} \usepackage{geometry} \geometry{letterpaper} \usepackage[parfill]{parskip} \usepackage {chemarr} \usepackage {pictex} \usepackage {m-ch-en} Are you sure you need \usepackage{pictex}?

[Fink-users] Latex luser question upon upgrade: tetex-texmf 3.0-1

2005-06-07 Thread William Scott
Hi Folks: Apologies in advance if this turns out to be a latex issue rather than a fink-specific one. I've been using Latex to typeset chemical formulae. While in the middle of writing a final exam, I decided to update fink, and Tetex was updated to 3.0 Now I am no longer able to

Re: [Fink-users] Latex luser question upon upgrade: tetex-texmf 3.0-1

2005-06-07 Thread Victor Eijkhout
On Jun 7, 2005, at 9:23 PM, William Scott wrote: I have no idea what a big version of TEX means, but this worked in the 2.x version and not the current one. Is there something I can do as a user, or do I need to change something and recompile? An internal table of TeX has overflowed. You