Daniel Macks wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 03:18:08PM -0700, William Scott wrote:
I just realized it was re-installing an older version of gettext-dev.
The new one in unstable behaves ok. May I suggest promoting the new
one (rev. 24) to stable?
Last I heard, (hi drm!) there is still a
On 1/4/06, Geoffrey Alan Washburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Macks wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 03:18:08PM -0700, William Scott wrote:
I just realized it was re-installing an older version of gettext-dev.
The new one in unstable behaves ok. May I suggest promoting the new
one
Moreover, gettext-dev and libgettext3-dev are only supposed to be
build-depends for other stuff, and you should therefore never have to
force remove one or the other.
libgettext3-dev is left in place after I install or update (for
example) KDE, and the next time I do a fink selfupdate it
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 12:56:08PM -0700, William Scott wrote:
Moreover, gettext-dev and libgettext3-dev are only supposed to be
build-depends for other stuff, and you should therefore never have to
force remove one or the other.
libgettext3-dev is left in place after I install or update
I just realized it was re-installing an older version of gettext-dev.
The new one in unstable behaves ok. May I suggest promoting the new
one (rev. 24) to stable?
Bill
On Oct 25, 2005, at 3:09 PM, William Scott wrote:
Hi Dan:
...
gettext-dev (version 0.10.40-19) is to be installed.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 03:18:08PM -0700, William Scott wrote:
I just realized it was re-installing an older version of gettext-dev.
The new one in unstable behaves ok. May I suggest promoting the new
one (rev. 24) to stable?
Last I heard, (hi drm!) there is still a bug in certain upgrade
