Marc Baaden wrote:
[]
> Any paraview-geek among us?
Not me, in any case :-)
Maybe there are more of those on the paraview mailing list
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
--
Martin
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Downloa
Hi,
a little update on paraview/mpi. I have now tested the openmpi version, and it
behaves much better (but not completely right). For simple visualizations
(surface, ..) it works fine in parallel.
However, it opens an additional OpenGL window for this, apparently to
pre-calculate the individu
Hi,
thanks for building the paraview-mpi packages. I have just tested the lammpi
one. It compiles and builds fine and starts up properly. However when I try to
use it in parallel on some real data via
lamboot -v
lam-mpirun -np 2 /sw/bin/paraview
I get the following:
[..]
ErrorMessage
# Error
Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
> Marc Baaden wrote:
[]
>> In this particular case, I think it might eventually be desirable to
>> have both a paraview and a paraview-mpi in the packages list (like is
>> the case eg for gromacs). Whom should/could I talk to for such a suggestion?
>>
> The package mai
Marc Baaden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder what procedure to adopt to install a package that is in fink
> with some modified configuration options. In particular I would like
> to install paraview (fink install paraview works fine) with activated
> mpi support. For this I will most probably need to run
Hi,
I wonder what procedure to adopt to install a package that is in fink
with some modified configuration options. In particular I would like
to install paraview (fink install paraview works fine) with activated
mpi support. For this I will most probably need to run ccmake at some
intermediate s
