03.09.2019 4:27, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 02/09/2019 05:17, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
30.08.2019 19:15, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 30/08/2019 08:48, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
1. Let's use SQL subtype in order to represent in the message UTC or
regional time,
03.09.2019 4:32, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 02/09/2019 06:26, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
If even this causes problems offset may be displayed instead, i.e.
GMT+3. That's definitely trivial.
Fallback for the crazy situation of wrong client (without ICU) is
Not ag
03.09.2019 4:20, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 02/09/2019 08:06, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
ICU library often missing on windows client.
No, it's not, the C/C++ runtime causes much more problem in Windows than
ICU.
It is very far from my own expirience
Regards,
Vlad
On 02/09/2019 06:26, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
>
> If even this causes problems offset may be displayed instead, i.e.
> GMT+3. That's definitely trivial.
>
Fallback for the crazy situation of wrong client (without ICU) is
already present: display gmt time with region "GMT*".
Craz
On 02/09/2019 05:17, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
> 30.08.2019 19:15, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>> On 30/08/2019 08:48, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> 1. Let's use SQL subtype in order to represent in the message UTC or
>>> regional time, i.e. for time with time zone 2 subtype
On 02/09/2019 08:22, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 02.09.2019 13:16, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
>> How to make server always use offset (not timezone code) in selected
>> TS with TZ using coersion?
>
> Usual way for data coercion: application just set desired data type in
> metadata d
On 02/09/2019 08:06, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
> ICU library often missing on windows client.
No, it's not, the C/C++ runtime causes much more problem in Windows than
ICU.
Adriano
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird
Metadata script extracted using ISQL is invalid/incorrect when table has
COMPUTED BY field with COLLATION
-
Key: CORE-6133
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/
More info at this https://www.tabsoverspaces.com/id/233796 link.
--
Mgr. Jiří Činčura
Independent IT Specialist
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
02.09.2019 14:35, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Pools are also used for memory accounting.
valgrind and DrMemory are better on this.
It's the same. As soon someone does not chain everything being allocated
or has non-memory resources, finalizers are needed when delete by pool
is used.
On 02/09/2019 08:22, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
> On 02.09.2019 13:42, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>> 02.09.2019 12:26, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
>>> When first pool-enabled classes were added to firebird ~15 years ago
>>> allocators were absolutely unable to peresent fireb
On 02/09/2019 07:21, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 02.09.2019 12:15, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
>> Don't gorget - 'classic' smart pointers, containers, etc. do NOT work
>> when object is deleted by pool.
>
> That's why object in pool must never use non-pooled child object.
> Adriano mu
On 02.09.2019 14:30, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
02.09.2019 13:27, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
May be OK for future versions.
..."but now we are going to make a quick hack". Ok, ok.
Don't forget to make this hack for boolean datatype as well: those
applications that not aware o
> On Sep 2, 2019, at 6:26 AM, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel
>
> When first pool-enabled classes were added to firebird ~15 years ago
Double that - of course there weren’t classes thirty years ago.
Cheers,
Ann
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.ne
On 2-9-2019 13:16, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
On 02.09.2019 14:12, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
02.09.2019 13:06, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
Suggested approach makes it possible to tune server to return data in
a form required by partcular client.
And (just in case) I
02.09.2019 13:27, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
May be OK for future versions.
..."but now we are going to make a quick hack". Ok, ok.
Don't forget to make this hack for boolean datatype as well: those applications that
not aware of this new datatype should get it as a string.
On 02.09.2019 14:22, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
02.09.2019 13:16, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
How to make server always use offset (not timezone code) in selected
TS with TZ using coersion?
Usual way for data coercion: application just set desired data type
in metadata during fet
02.09.2019 13:22, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
Delete by pool is very important performance optimization.
Yes, it is nice but has a high price demanding careful design of classes and their
interactions which is not currently the case.
--
WBR, SD.
Firebird-Devel mailing list
On 02.09.2019 13:42, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
02.09.2019 12:26, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
When first pool-enabled classes were added to firebird ~15 years ago
allocators were absolutely unable to peresent firebird pools.
Pools were implemented that time because standard memory
02.09.2019 13:16, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
How to make server always use offset (not timezone code) in selected TS with TZ using
coersion?
Usual way for data coercion: application just set desired data type in metadata during
fetch.
PS: I understand that it may be convenient
On 02.09.2019 14:12, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
02.09.2019 13:06, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
Suggested approach makes it possible to tune server to return data in
a form required by partcular client.
And (just in case) I repeat: suggested approach duplicate data
coercion functio
02.09.2019 13:06, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
Suggested approach makes it possible to tune server to return data in a form required by
partcular client.
And (just in case) I repeat: suggested approach duplicate data coercion functionality
and is superfluous.
--
WBR, SD.
Fi
On 02.09.2019 13:53, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
On 2-9-2019 11:35, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
On 02.09.2019 11:25, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
30.08.2019 20:41, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Hope Alex will answer this, below is my own understanding of
propositions.
Could you explicitly describe t
On 2-9-2019 11:35, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
On 02.09.2019 11:25, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
30.08.2019 20:41, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Hope Alex will answer this, below is my own understanding of
propositions.
Could you explicitly describe the problem you think this solves, and
how y
02.09.2019 12:26, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
When first pool-enabled classes were added to firebird ~15 years ago allocators
were absolutely unable to peresent firebird pools.
Pools were implemented that time because standard memory manager was slower. Had
someone compared thei
On 02.09.2019 13:21, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
02.09.2019 12:15, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
Don't gorget - 'classic' smart pointers, containers, etc. do NOT work
when object is deleted by pool.
That's why object in pool must never use non-pooled child object.
Adriano must use p
02.09.2019 12:15, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
Don't gorget - 'classic' smart pointers, containers, etc. do NOT work when object is
deleted by pool.
That's why object in pool must never use non-pooled child object. Adriano must use
pooled Allocator in his SimilarMatcher for std co
On 02.09.2019 13:10, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
02.09.2019 12:06, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
Certainly it's much, much better to define rules of object deletion
at construction time than to delete something explicitly (here and
there) when object is going to be destroyed.
That's
02.09.2019 12:06, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
Certainly it's much, much better to define rules of object deletion at construction time
than to delete something explicitly (here and there) when object is going to be destroyed.
That's the job for smart pointers and containers.
--
On 30.08.2019 19:20, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 30/08/2019 08:56, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
27.08.2019 3:59, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
Sometimes a object managed by memory-pool may embed non-pooled memory or
other resources.
If the main object is not explicitly destroyed, i.e
On 02.09.2019 11:25, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
30.08.2019 20:41, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Hope Alex will answer this, below is my own understanding of
propositions.
Could you explicitly describe the problem you think this solves, and
how your proposal solves it?
Hmm... the first paragraph at or
On 02.09.2019 11:17, Vlad Khorsun wrote:
30.08.2019 19:15, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 30/08/2019 08:48, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
1. Let's use SQL subtype in order to represent in the message UTC or
regional time, i.e. for time with time zone 2 subtypes will make sen
30.08.2019 20:41, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
Hope Alex will answer this, below is my own understanding of propositions.
Could you explicitly describe the problem you think this solves, and how your
proposal solves it?
Hmm... the first paragraph at original message explains it
BTW: This subj
30.08.2019 19:15, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 30/08/2019 08:48, Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
1. Let's use SQL subtype in order to represent in the message UTC or
regional time, i.e. for time with time zone 2 subtypes will make sense
- UTC format or regional format. When u
On 31.08.2019 12:41, liviuslivius wrote:
>>About tools: isql supports all newer features
Who use isql, really?
I do. :)
I suppose only to confirm some bug. I cannot imagine that someone use
it by typing directly commands inside or looking at textual output if
gui tools have grids, filterin
35 matches
Mail list logo
