On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 22:03, Douglas Tosi wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Mercea Paul wrote:
>> Should I compile my own Fb provider?
>
> fwiw, that's what I did. It's easy and works very well.
Yep, I added this configuration to solution couple weeks ago, so it's easy.
--
Jiri {x2}
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Mercea Paul wrote:
> Should I compile my own Fb provider?
fwiw, that's what I did. It's easy and works very well.
Regards,
--
Douglas Tosi
www.sinatica.com
--
Crystal Reports - New Free
The final version of 2.5 will be build with 3.5 targets and with 2.0 too.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (CTO x2develop.com)
http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Da
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 18:11, Justin Sommercorn wrote:
> Ironically, the support forum pointed me here. The thing that would really
:)
> help me out the most here is letting me know if there is a more efficient
> way of adding large amounts of data to a BLOB. It seems that the appending
> to
Hi *
Maintaining my application up to date suppose to maintain all components up
to date (Fb server (2.1.0->2.1.2), Windows updates,repots, sql files, etc).
Including last FB .Net Provider generate new issue for end user.she/he need
to install .Net Framework 3.5 because Fb.Net Provider include Ent
running ASP.Net Provider on Medium trust level servers is impossible - security
reason
--
Key: DNET-228
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/DNET-228
Project: .
Ironically, the support forum pointed me here. The thing that would really
help me out the most here is letting me know if there is a more efficient
way of adding large amounts of data to a BLOB. It seems that the appending
to itself is not the best way to do it.
"Jiri Cincura" wrote in mess
