Hello:
> Ok. Seems my english is quite bad :-)
Maybe using the Native term isn't as accurate as it could be but, as
the pure C# GDS implementations are under the Managed namespace i think
it's clear enough ;)
-
This SF.net e
> No, native means that it will use some "native" firebird client dll
> (fbembedded, fnclient, gds32, ... )
Ok. Seems my english is quite bad :-)
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the
Hello:
> Thought about this. Can i understand that "native" related to .NET
> provider, i.e. implemented inside of provider?
No, native means that it will use some "native" firebird client dll
(fbembedded, fnclient, gds32, ... )
-
Hello:
> No, that is one byte that is being communicated while establishing the
> connection. IB 5.x had wire protocol version 9, IB 6.x, FB 1.x, FB 2.0,
> IB 7.x (and very likely IB 2007) have protocol version 10. FB 2.1
> supports protocol versions 10 and 11.
>
> Client talking wire protocol
> No, that is one byte that is being communicated while establishing the
> connection. IB 5.x had wire protocol version 9, IB 6.x, FB 1.x, FB 2.0,
> IB 7.x (and very likely IB 2007) have protocol version 10. FB 2.1
> supports protocol versions 10 and 11.
>
> Client talking wire protocol 10 is n
>>> What is version 10 ? Maby Version_1, Version_2, ets... ?
>> It's the version of FB Protocol. AFAIK.
>
> It's impossible. Newest Interbase server has version 8 and protocol
> didn't change in each version, so protocol version can't be greater than
> server version. So i think that "version
> Not ODS, but GDS (the protocol version wasn't the right term).
Ok, than what GDS has FB 1.0 and FB 1.5 ?
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
co
sasha wrote:
>>> What is version 10 ? Maby Version_1, Version_2, ets... ?
>>
>> It's the version of FB Protocol. AFAIK.
>
> It's impossible. Newest Interbase server has version 8 and protocol
> didn't change in each version, so protocol version can't be greater than
> server version. So i thi
>> What is version 10 ? Maby Version_1, Version_2, ets... ?
>
> It's the version of FB Protocol. AFAIK.
It's impossible. Newest Interbase server has version 8 and protocol
didn't change in each version, so protocol version can't be greater than
server version. So i think that "version 10" sou
> 2.
>
> FirebirdSql.Data.Client.Embedded -> FirebirdSql.Data.Client.Native
Thought about this. Can i understand that "native" related to .NET
provider, i.e. implemented inside of provider?
If so, than here is ambiguity and this is bad namespace and i propose
something like
FirebirdSql.Data.C
sasha wrote:
> What is version 10 ? Maby Version_1, Version_2, ets... ?
It's the version of FB Protocol. AFAIK.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura
http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
-
This SF.net email is sponsored
> FirebirdSql.Data.Client.Gds -> FirebirdSql.Data.Client.Managed10
>
> or
>
> FirebirdSql.Data.Client.Gds -> FirebirdSql.Data.Client.Managed.Version10
What is version 10 ? Maby Version_1, Version_2, ets... ?
> FirebirdSql.Data.Client.Embedded -> FirebirdSql.Data.Client.Native
+1
-
Hello,
Jiri Cincura said the following on 02.05.2007 13:29:
>> FirebirdSql.Data.Client.Embedded -> FirebirdSql.Data.Client.Native
>
> Should be in this word "embedded" too? To not confuse programmers.
Native protocol implementation could be used to access regular (not
embedded) servers also. S
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez ™ wrote:
> Hello:
>
> > OK, I was just think from POV of new programmer taking our assembly.
>
> It's an internal namespace, so i think there souldn't be any problem
> with the name change XD
Damn. I'm not focused. So with this (new) :) info it's ok.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincur
Hello:
OK, I was just think from POV of new programmer taking our assembly.
It's an internal namespace, so i think there souldn't be any problem with
the name change XD
--
Un saludo
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Vigo-Spain
http://carlosga.wordpress.com
--
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez ™ wrote:
> Hello:
>
>
> > Should be in this word "embedded" too? To not confuse programmers.
>
> I don't think so as right now you can give the dll used as library in
> the connection string,
> so calling it Native will be more according to this fact, IMHO
>
> Web can th
Hello:
Should be in this word "embedded" too? To not confuse programmers.
I don't think so as right now you can give the dll used as library in the
connection string,
so calling it Native will be more according to this fact, IMHO
Web can think on change the Server Type enum to reflect that a
Hello:
I'm thinking on change the name of some internal namespaces while
implementing the new protocol for Firebird 2.1
The changes are:
1.
FirebirdSql.Data.Client.Gds -> FirebirdSql.Data.Client.Managed10
or
FirebirdSql.Data.Client.Gds -> FirebirdSql.Data.Client.Managed.Version10
2.
Fireb
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez ™ wrote:
> FirebirdSql.Data.Client.Gds -> FirebirdSql.Data.Client.Managed.Version10
This looks better for me.
>
> 2.
>
> FirebirdSql.Data.Client.Embedded -> FirebirdSql.Data.Client.Native
Should be in this word "embedded" too? To not confuse programmers.
--
Jiri {x2} Ci
19 matches
Mail list logo
