--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Thomas Steinmaurer ts@... wrote:
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Thomas Steinmaurerts@ wrote:
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Doug
Chamberlinchamberlin.doug@ wrote:
On 2/29/12 2:50 PM, todderamaa wrote:
Maybe with the
Hi Todd,
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Thomas Steinmaurerts@... wrote:
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Thomas Steinmaurerts@ wrote:
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Doug
Chamberlinchamberlin.doug@wrote:
On 2/29/12 2:50 PM, todderamaa wrote:
Maybe with
Probably beating a dead horse, but ...
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:44 PM, todderamaa toddera...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have heard that you can corrupt a database when copying it with active
connections. I am wondering if incremental windows backups are different
than a 'copy'.
You may have heard
We are working with large (5-30 GB) Firebird (2.x) databases.
There were some occasions where when copying even the original became
currupted.
Not often but still - we haven't documented it.
Lately we don't encounter such problems - as you securely understand - man
get used to automatically
I just did a test in our environment. I logged into the database and made a
change. The date modified on the database file wasn't updated. But when I
logged out of the database, the date modified was updated. I was the only
one logged into the database at the time.
I logged into a
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Thomas Steinmaurer ts@... wrote:
I just did a test in our environment. I logged into the database and made
a change. The date modified on the database file wasn't updated. But when
I logged out of the database, the date modified was updated.
Of todderamaa
Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 1:22 PM
To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [firebird-support] Re: Timestamp of Database File
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
mailto:firebird-support%40yahoogroups.com , Thomas Steinmaurer ts@...
wrote:
I just did a test
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Thomas Steinmaurerts@... wrote:
I just did a test in our environment. I logged into the database and made
a change. The date modified on the database file wasn't updated. But when
I logged out of the database, the date modified was updated. I
@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 8:21 PM
Subject: [firebird-support] Re: Timestamp of Database File
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Thomas Steinmaurer ts@... wrote:
I just did a test in our environment. I logged into the database and made
a change
.
Benno
- Original Message -
From: todderamaa
To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 8:21 PM
Subject: [firebird-support] Re: Timestamp of Database File
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Thomas Steinmaurer ts@ wrote
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Thomas Steinmaurer ts@... wrote:
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Thomas Steinmaurerts@ wrote:
I just did a test in our environment. I logged into the database and
made a change. The date modified on the database file wasn't updated.
todderamaa wrote:
We just had an issue at a site and the client was thinking they could use
their Incremental Backups on their network to solve the issue. They were
surprised to see that the database was being missed This is why I posted to
find a solution.
I think that probably answers
On 2/29/12 2:50 PM, todderamaa wrote:
Maybe with the possibility of corruption, I should tell him to exclude
the database files from backup entirely and only backup the gbk files
that are created in the evening.
This is the usual way to backup Firebird databases in situations like
your clients
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Doug Chamberlin chamberlin.doug@...
wrote:
On 2/29/12 2:50 PM, todderamaa wrote:
Maybe with the possibility of corruption, I should tell him to exclude
the database files from backup entirely and only backup the gbk files
that are created in the
Doug,
On 2/29/12 2:50 PM, todderamaa wrote:
Maybe with the possibility of corruption, I should tell him to exclude
the database files from backup entirely and only backup the gbk files
that are created in the evening.
This is the usual way to backup Firebird databases in situations like
On 2/29/12 3:30 PM, todderamaa wrote:
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Doug Chamberlin
chamberlin.doug@... wrote:
On 2/29/12 2:50 PM, todderamaa wrote:
Maybe with the possibility of corruption, I should tell him to exclude
the database files from backup entirely and only backup the
On 2/29/12 3:28 PM, todderamaa wrote:
But with this latest issue, we needed the database file and not the
backup. The restore of the backup failed, because we had a stored
procedure that was selectable that didn't include a 'suspend'
statement. I think this must be something that was allowed
Doug,
If Firebird's' classic architecture is being used then each process accessing
the
file can read it. However, it's hard to imagine a read-only file access would
corrupt the file being read.
Perhaps better experts than I can give you a more definitive answer.
We have over 100
On 2/29/12 3:47 PM, Leyne, Sean wrote:
The NBackup functionality allows a database file to be quiesced (with
changes written to a delta file) to allow for OS level backups to be
performed (thru Lock and Unlock options).
But doesn't that just move the potential conflict to the delta file,
Den 2012-02-29 22:22 skrev Doug Chamberlin såhär:
On 2/29/12 3:47 PM, Leyne, Sean wrote:
The NBackup functionality allows a database file to be quiesced (with
changes written to a delta file) to allow for OS level backups to be
performed (thru Lock and Unlock options).
But doesn't that
Doug,
The NBackup functionality allows a database file to be quiesced (with
changes written to a delta file) to allow for OS level backups to be
performed (thru Lock and Unlock options).
But doesn't that just move the potential conflict to the delta file, leaving
you
with the same issue
Kjell,
I did have some issue with it 1-2 years ago, with a rather large DB.
Some problem with transaction commit during nbackup locked state. I never
had time to investigate if it was really caused by nbackup, but it only
happened in that state...
A review of the project tracker finds that
Sean,
I did have some issue with it 1-2 years ago, with a rather large DB.
Some problem with transaction commit during nbackup locked state. I never
had time to investigate if it was really caused by nbackup, but it only
happened in that state...
A review of the project tracker finds that
Thomas,
To quote Dmitry from a few weeks ago (around mid Jan. 2012), the usage of
nbackup in 2.1 with Classic under high load can be problematic. It seems
that there was quite a re-write in 2.5 though.
I believe that his comment was related to the use in creating backup, not in
locking the
Sean,
To quote Dmitry from a few weeks ago (around mid Jan. 2012), the usage of
nbackup in 2.1 with Classic under high load can be problematic. It seems
that there was quite a re-write in 2.5 though.
I believe that his comment was related to the use in creating backup, not in
locking the
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Thomas Steinmaurer ts@... wrote:
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Doug Chamberlinchamberlin.doug@
wrote:
On 2/29/12 2:50 PM, todderamaa wrote:
Maybe with the possibility of corruption, I should tell him to exclude
the database files
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Thomas Steinmaurerts@... wrote:
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Doug Chamberlinchamberlin.doug@
wrote:
On 2/29/12 2:50 PM, todderamaa wrote:
Maybe with the possibility of corruption, I should tell him to exclude
the database files from
27 matches
Mail list logo
