hi all
i've found some "spots" and i would like to resume there here becouse maybe
will help some Others.
1) there are lot of discussions around web about problems wtih windowsDomain
controller , active directory etc, i dont know for my inability or maybe
becouse often the "answers" seems n
Hi Mark
it is possible to use and external usb drive to try a test?
i were reading lot of documentats (if i am not wrong , also some official FB
papers) where is specified to do not use for DB integrity in case of "disaster"
any write cache options
for now , on the server , obviusly , bo
On 18 Dec 2014 17:32:40 -0800, "af_12...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]"
wrote:
> Hi Louis
> yes true, with fiew connections i do not risk big troubles about it ,
but
> as for now , i am just making some smal test writing blob fields on an
> empy db and on a w2008 active directory server and i ge
Hi Louis
yes true, with fiew connections i do not risk big troubles about it , but as
for now , i am just making some smal test writing blob fields on an empy db and
on a w2008 active directory server and i get 10x times operation slower then my
client
i know i need a support designing the
1:43 PM
To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Odp: [firebird-support] FB server installation a nd concurrent
users limits on Windows Server
Hi Mark
thank you very much! your answer is very detailed
so :
>Based on your link below, you are confusing the specific p
On 07 Nov 2014 03:42:44 -0800, "af_12...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]"
wrote:
> >Based on your link below, you are confusing the specific problems of
>>running on an active directory server with a problem with the windows
>>>filesystem cache on 64 bit windows. An issue that has been addressed i
Hi Mark
thank you very much! your answer is very detailed
so :
>Based on your link below, you are confusing the specific problems of
>running on an active directory server with a problem with the windows
>>filesystem cache on 64 bit windows. An issue that has been addressed in
Fir
>>>Current windows versions of SuperServer and SuperClassic has a limit of
>>>1024 concurrent connections,
>>
>> 2048 since V.2.5.3.
At 08:32 p.m. 7/11/2014, Mark Rotteveel m...@lawinegevaar.nl [firebird-support]
wrote:
>I had missed that this had been backported to 2.5 :)
Or up-ported to
On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 14:39:45 +1300, "Helen Borrie hele...@iinet.net.au
[firebird-support]" wrote:
> At 11:34 a.m. 7/11/2014, Mark Rotteveel m...@lawinegevaar.nl
> [firebird-support] wrote:
>
>>Current windows versions of SuperServer and SuperClassic has a limit of
>>1024 concurrent connections,
At 11:34 a.m. 7/11/2014, Mark Rotteveel m...@lawinegevaar.nl [firebird-support]
wrote:
>Current windows versions of SuperServer and SuperClassic has a limit of
>1024 concurrent connections,
2048 since V.2.5.3.
Helen
On 6-11-2014 20:22, af_12...@yahoo.com [firebird-support] wrote:
> i am "new" to databases and i am "going to choose" Firebird.
>
> Supposing that i will have to interact with some MS server where are
> some already installed software, mail server and other softwares i were
> starting to ask if is
On 06.11.2014 20:22, af_12...@yahoo.com [firebird-support] wrote:
>
>
> Hi
>
> i am "new" to databases and i am "going to choose" Firebird.
>
> Supposing that i will have to interact with some MS server where are
> some already installed software, mail server and other softwares i were
> sta
Hi
i am "new" to databases and i am "going to choose" Firebird.
Supposing that i will have to interact with some MS server where are some
already installed software, mail server and other softwares i were starting to
ask if is there any limit about the number of concurrent Clients that could
a
Hi there,
> Hi do you use it also on a windows server system with an active WINDOWS
> DOMAIN CONTROLLER ?
I used to run Firebird 1.5 databases on domain controllers, and it
worked fine. The databases did not reside on the same disk as the
active directory database though.
Issues with Windows do
On 05 Nov 2014 02:49:28 -0800, "af_12...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]"
wrote:
> Hi do you use it also on a windows server system with an active WINDOWS
> DOMAIN CONTROLLER ?
As far as I know windows disables (or disabled) several forms of disk
caching on the disk that contains the active director
Hi do you use it also on a windows server system with an active WINDOWS DOMAIN
CONTROLLER ?
16 matches
Mail list logo
