Could someone summarize why Terrence Deacon's book is such a presumed
breakthrough judging by the buzz it has generated among FIS
enthusiasts?
Thanks.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Pedro C. Marijuan
wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> Krassimir Markov's suggestion is excellent. Next year we could
form, exhibits a spontaneous tendency for its dynamics to
> diversify and complexify these forms, both intrinsically and in their
> relationship to their contexts.”
>
> This is also true of LCTS! – rkl
>
> 276 “The incessant need to replace and reconstruct organism components
>
Steven Ericsson-Zenith
> Institute for Advanced Science & Engineering
> http://iase.info
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Apr 27, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Hector Zenil wrote:
>
>> Could someone summarize why Terrence Deacon's book is such a presumed
>> breakthr
Information that readers may find interesting:
Stephen Wolfram has written the first in a series of blogs posts about
NKS titled "It's Been 10 Years; What's Happened with A New Kind of
Science?":
http://blog.stephenwolfram.com/2012/05/its-been-10-years-whats-happened-with-a-new-kind-of-science/
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> On 11 May 2012, at 13:10, Hector Zenil wrote:
>
> Information that readers may find interesting:
>
>
> Stephen Wolfram has written the first in a series of blogs posts about
>
> NKS titled "It's Been 10
(Escuela Superior de Cómputo, Instituto
Politécnico Nacional; Centre for Unconventional Computing, University of
the West of England & LABORES)
- Dr. Juan Carlos SECK TUOH MORA (Área Académica de Ingeniería, Universidad
Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo)
- Dr. Hector ZENIL (Department of Computer Sci
t
> (complex, innovative) science you must have an interdisciplinary approach.
Francis Crick was a physicist at the Physics Cavendish Laboratory in
Cambridge with Watson, Frederick Sanger was a biochemist, etc.
Best,
- Hector Zenil
http://www.hectorzenil.net/
>>
>>
>>
sorg opens their popularizing note about the above article with:
"Second layer of information in DNA confirmed"
Interesting.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:10 PM, Hector Zenil wrote:
>> 2016-06-08 16:40 GMT-03:00 John Collier :
>>>
>>> A previously hypothesized “
I think complaining about Shannon entropy as a measure of information is
completely justified because it is steam-engine physics unfortunately still
widely used despite its many flaws and limitations.
But to think that Shannon entropy is at the front-end in the mathematical
discussion of informati
There is no way I could trust such a proof as it would completely rely on
the very particular and certainly arbitrary axiomatic theory in which such
a proof could be produced (there is no way we can take the 'universe' as
being operating on theories of relativity and quantum field, for
example). It
Information Value (https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.04349).
And we even show how Entropy fails at the most basic level:
Low Algorithmic Complexity Entropy-deceiving Graphs (
https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.05972)
Best Regards,
Hector Zenil
---
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
lier/papers/infsym.pdf> (*Symmetry* 1996).
>
Very nice paper. I agree on symmetry breaking, I have similar ideas:
https://arxiv.org/abs/1210.1572
(published in the journal of Natural Computing)
On how symmetric rules can produce assymetric information.
Best,
Hector Zenil
http://www.hector
12 matches
Mail list logo
