Bien reçu votre message. MERCI. Cordialement. M. Godron
Le 17/07/2016 à 20:21, Loet Leydesdorff a écrit :
Dear Michel and colleagues,
I agree that adaptation is not specifically human and that "humanity's
main adaptive role" is not to be defined as "information".
I agree also.
The best candid
Bien reçu votre message. MERCI. Cordialement. M. Godron
Le 17/07/2016 à 20:21, Loet Leydesdorff a écrit :
Dear Michel and colleagues,
I agree that adaptation is not specifically human and that "humanity's
main adaptive role" is not to be defined as "information".
I agree also !
The best candi
Dear Michel and colleagues,
I agree that adaptation is not specifically human and that "humanity's main
adaptive role" is not to be defined as "information". The best candidate
for a spefically human is probably, in my opinion, "double contingency":
Ego expects Alter to entertain expectations as s
You wrote :
"First, humanity’s MAIN ADAPTIVE ROLE is “information,” if someone
questions that fact _I invite you to post your view _and I will happily
“reply.
My reply is (in red) :
O K but I am not sure that the profound reason why it is true is clear
for every one : this constatation "hum
Greetings to all,
This A Priori Modeling session began Thursday, 16 June, and today marks
four weeks. As “session leader” some meta-comments seem needed. In gauging
our progress, a sense akin to that in Terry Deacon’s 30 Jan 2015 post comes
to mind:
> . . . I haven't felt that the specific com
