od
>> was: "the cyberneticist observes what might have happened but did not".
>> There is a point where idealised analogies cannot map onto experience. Then
>> we learn something new.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> Mark
>> -
gt; we learn something new.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Mark
> --
> From: Loet Leydesdorff <l...@leydesdorff.net>
> Sent: 09/06/2016 12:52
> To: 'John Collier' <colli...@ukzn.ac.za>; 'Joseph Brenner'
> <joe.bren...@bluewin.ch>;
nd “mechanicist” can be used to capture
> reducible dynamics that we get from any conservative system (what I call
> Hamiltonian systems in my papers on the dynamics of emergence – such
> systems don’t show emergent properties except in a trivial sense of being
> unant*i*cipate
collier
From: Fis [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On Behalf Of Joseph Brenner
Sent: Thursday, 09 June 2016 11:10 AM
To: fis <fis@listas.unizar.es>
Subject: [Fis] Fw: "Mechanical Information" in DNA
Dear Folks,
In my humble opinion, "Mechanical Information" is a co
beck, University of London;
<http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ych9gNYJ=en>
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ych9gNYJ=en
From: Fis [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On Behalf Of John Collier
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 12:04 PM
To: Joseph Brenner; fis
Subject: Re:
AM
To: fis <fis@listas.unizar.es>
Subject: [Fis] Fw: "Mechanical Information" in DNA
Dear Folks,
In my humble opinion, "Mechanical Information" is a contradiction in terms when
applied to biological processes as described, among others, by Bob L. and his
colleagues. Wh
