sex.ac.uk/spru/>University of
> Sussex;
>
> Guest Professor Zhejiang Univ. <http://www.zju.edu.cn/english/>,
> Hangzhou; Visiting Professor, ISTIC,
> <http://www.istic.ac.cn/Eng/brief_en.html>Beijing;
>
> Visiting Professor, Birkbeck <http://www.bbk.a
ych9gNYJ=en
From: Fis [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On Behalf Of Marcus Abundis
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 7:11 AM
To: fis@listas.unizar.es
Subject: [Fis] Shannon-Weavers' Levels A, B, C.
Hey Mark,
Sorry if I confused things by commenting on Bateson AND THEN
Shannon-Weaver. In my
gt; Guest Professor Zhejiang Univ., Hangzhou; Visiting Professor, ISTIC, Beijing;
> Visiting Professor, Birkbeck, University of London;
> http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ych9gNYJ=en
>
> From: Fis [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On Behalf Of Marcus Abundis
> Sen
> On 2015-10-14, at 12:38 PM, Marcus Abundis wrote:
>
>> RE Mark Johnson's post of Thu Oct 1 09:47:13 on Bateson and imagination
Two quick remarks:
1. It's not at all clear to me that C is subsumptive of B.
2. I would lobby for Shannon/Bayesian relationships as an intermediary
between A. and B
Maybe I've missed something, but the subsumption I mentioned
(referring to Bateson) was not between A, B and C: these are
co-existent interacting dynamics as I understand them, and certainly a
very rigorous and powerful generative model.
I was worrying about subsumption of Bateson's "imagination"
