>>Would be interesting to compare with recently released Screenweaver HX
>>(http://haxe.org/swhx).
>
>
> ...says one of the authors of Screenweaver HX. Being a shill doesn't
> work unless you use a different name. ;)
Steven. You're posting your self-made comparison proclaiming mProjector
as th
I think that's fair enough :)
On 10/3/06, Steven Sacks | BLITZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm glad to hear the new version is performing better than the old one.
Indeed, it appears that Screenweaver deserves another look.
--
[ JPG ]
___
Flashc
> 1. SWHX is completely new, open source and cross-platform
Great news!
> 2. The old version was the bench mark to which other's hoped to
attain
> and worked great.
I disagree and there are many who would side with me. It wasn't stable
and it wasn't easy to code against.
> 3. The version y
oh yeah, one thing i will mark against mProjector was application
transparency on the mac. at the time there was a flaky kludge solution, not
sure if it's still the same.
On 10/3/06, Rich Rodecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
oh man...
mProject does rock. Well, at least it did like about a year
oh man...
mProject does rock. Well, at least it did like about a year and a half ago,
thats the last time I used it. cant vouch for any of the other ones.
mike mountain - just say it and stick by it. don't apologize and act like
you didnt mean to say it. you're allowed your opinon just as mu
Some updates on your knowledge of SWHX
1. SWHX is completely new, open source and cross-platform
2. The old version was the bench mark to which other's hoped to attain and
worked great.
3. The version you speak of, as I have heard, was a version that was
modified for a company you worked for -
Just an update: I work as a contractor now - not employeed by Blitz since
August 1st.
On 10/3/06, Ray Chuan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Curiously, John Greden, who is from the same agency as you, happens to
be an active promoter of Xray on this and other list(s). If John can
do it, there's
nd him in better stead next time.
Keep on with the good flash man.
Mike
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Steven Sacks | BLITZ
Sent: Tue 03/10/2006 19:08
To: Flashcoders mailing list
Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Projector Wrapper
Promoting it is one thing, but his
Promoting it is one thing, but his post was not a promotional post, but
more that of a call to action from an impartial party, which he is not.
I don't think Screenweaver being open and free makes it better
considering Screenweaver before it was open and free was, simply put,
bad. Here are some f
27;s not very user
friendly, no pretty gui etc.
M
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Derek Vadneau
> Sent: 03 October 2006 15:30
> To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
> Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Projector Wrapper
"I'd be rather worried if Nicolas didn't want to promote it."
Except that the original poster was asking for opinions and getting an
opinion from someone who develops one of the products is not as useful.
Besides, getting a little off the original request.
"I don't use haxe nor mtasc so for me I
Of Steven
> Sacks | BLITZ
> Sent: 02 October 2006 19:00
> To: Flashcoders mailing list
> Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Projector Wrapper
>
> > Would be interesting to compare with recently released
> Screenweaver HX
> > (http://haxe.org/swhx).
>
> ...says one of
n Sacks | BLITZ
> Sent: 02 October 2006 19:00
> To: Flashcoders mailing list
> Subject: RE: [Flashcoders] Projector Wrapper
>
> > Would be interesting to compare with recently released
> Screenweaver HX
> > (http://haxe.org/swhx).
>
> ...says one of the authors of
Hi,
Curiously, John Greden, who is from the same agency as you, happens to
be an active promoter of Xray on this and other list(s). If John can
do it, there's no reason why Nicholas can't.
On 10/3/06, Steven Sacks | BLITZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would be interesting to compare with recentl
> Would be interesting to compare with recently released Screenweaver HX
> (http://haxe.org/swhx).
...says one of the authors of Screenweaver HX. Being a shill doesn't
work unless you use a different name. ;)
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To ch
> http://www.screentime.com/software/mprojector/
>
> mProjector is the best wrapper out there, period. It's completely stable and
> has the absolute best performance and smallest memory and filesize footprint
> (I've done metrics). The API is outstanding, well-thought out and easier to
> use
Wow, thanks a lot for your post. I had come across the mprojector, but
as I am completely unexperienced in this field, I sure appreciate your
words.
:)
Steven Sacks | BLITZ wrote:
http://www.screentime.com/software/mprojector/
mProjector is the best wrapper out there, period. It's complete
http://www.screentime.com/software/mprojector/
mProjector is the best wrapper out there, period. It's completely stable and
has the absolute best performance and smallest memory and filesize footprint
(I've done metrics). The API is outstanding, well-thought out and easier to
use than any of
I'd go with SWFStudio or Screenweaver.
Ian
On 9/29/06, Telmo Dias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, but can you suggest a replacement?
Telmo
Ian Thomas wrote:
> I disagree.
>
> Twice now, I have had Zinc upgrades break existing functionality that
> I relied on, and those new bugs have only been
Ok, but can you suggest a replacement?
Telmo
Ian Thomas wrote:
I disagree.
Twice now, I have had Zinc upgrades break existing functionality that
I relied on, and those new bugs have only been fixed several versions
later.
They keep introducing new functionality, and do very little to ensure
t
I disagree.
Twice now, I have had Zinc upgrades break existing functionality that
I relied on, and those new bugs have only been fixed several versions
later.
They keep introducing new functionality, and do very little to ensure
the stability of the existing codebase. Personally I'd rather they
I use Zinc and it is fine, good support!
2006/9/29, Telmo Dias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
I read a few of those posts regarding sfw/projector wrappers.
I would like to create a small kind of widget that stays in the systray
(windows only), and connects to the server to update info, from time to
22 matches
Mail list logo
