[flexcoders] Flex/ColdFusion use-mappings ignored?

2008-05-02 Thread Tom McNeer
Hi, In developing a Flex application locally, I am compiling against a remoting-config.xml which has the value set to "true." And in the development environment, this works fine. However, when I deploy it to a production server (a VPS), the mappings are ignored. I can only hit the CFCs by follow

RE: [flexcoders] Flex/ColdFusion use-mappings ignored?

2008-05-02 Thread Dale Fraser
riday, 2 May 2008 9:13 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Flex/ColdFusion use-mappings ignored? Hi, In developing a Flex application locally, I am compiling against a remoting-config.xml which has the value set to "true." And in the development environment, thi

Re: [flexcoders] Flex/ColdFusion use-mappings ignored?

2008-05-02 Thread Tom McNeer
Hi Dale, Thanks for the response. On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Works fine for us. > > > As far as I can tell, it works fine for everybody. And it works fine for me in the dev environment. I've never heard of a problem like this, which is why I fig

RE: [flexcoders] Flex/ColdFusion use-mappings ignored?

2008-05-02 Thread Battershall, Jeff
-Original Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom McNeer Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 11:00 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Flex/ColdFusion use-mappings ignored?

Re: [flexcoders] Flex/ColdFusion use-mappings ignored?

2008-05-02 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Friday 02 May 2008, Battershall, Jeff wrote: > remote proxies. Personally I have my doubts about this approach as it > doesn't seem to support a source-control managed environment, We've got the folder for the generated RemoteProxies under source control, but not the files in it. Seems to w

RE: [flexcoders] Flex/ColdFusion use-mappings ignored?

2008-05-02 Thread Battershall, Jeff
work with that? -Original Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Chiverton Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 11:42 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Flex/ColdFusion use-mappings ignored? On Friday 02 May 2008, Battershall

Re: [flexcoders] Flex/ColdFusion use-mappings ignored?

2008-05-02 Thread Tom McNeer
Jeff, I think you've misunderstood. I'll try to be clearer. On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Battershall, Jeff < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Personally I have my doubts about this approach as it doesn't seem to > support a source-control managed environment, but I'm willing to be > convinced

Re: [flexcoders] Flex/ColdFusion use-mappings ignored?

2008-05-06 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Friday 02 May 2008, Battershall, Jeff wrote: > As I said, I'm willing to be convinced otherwise, but you'd have to make > sure that your paths are correct Dev. is the same as live, as far as ColdSpring is concerned (a 'coldspring' mapping) and the generated CFCs use a relative path of '/com/f

RE: [flexcoders] Flex/ColdFusion use-mappings ignored?

2008-05-06 Thread Battershall, Jeff
n Behalf Of Tom Chiverton Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 6:14 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Flex/ColdFusion use-mappings ignored? On Friday 02 May 2008, Battershall, Jeff wrote: > As I said, I'm willing to be convinced otherwise, but you'd have to >

Re: [flexcoders] Flex/ColdFusion use-mappings ignored?

2008-05-06 Thread Tom McNeer
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Battershall, Jeff < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > C'mon - I'm not questioning your decision to take that approach - all I > > was just trying to help the guy with the off-the-wall behavior he was > > seeing. What's your take on his problem? > > > > > > > > I'm stil

Re: [flexcoders] Flex/ColdFusion use-mappings ignored?

2008-05-06 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Tuesday 06 May 2008, Tom McNeer wrote: > I don't expect anyone to do extensive legwork on something this arcane. > I'll keep hammering at it myself. I'd take the .xml config files and 'diff' them, might produce a ton of false positives, and you might have to tidy up the XML first, but it might